Alejandra Casillas1, Gerardo Moreno2, Jonathan Grotts3, Chi-Hong Tseng3, Leo S Morales4. 1. Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, 911 Broxton Avenue, Los Angeles, CA, 90024, USA. acasillas@mednet.ucla.edu. 2. Department of Family Medicine, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 3. Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, 911 Broxton Avenue, Los Angeles, CA, 90024, USA. 4. Center for Health Equity, Diversity and Inclusion, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Use of an Internet portal to refill medicines positively affects medication adherence among English-speakers. No prior studies, however, have specifically examined the relationship between Internet refills and medication adherence among patients who are limited English proficient (LEP). OBJECTIVES: (1) Examine the relationship between Internet medication refill system use and medication adherence among linguistically diverse patients with chronic conditions and (2) compare this relationship between LEP and English-proficient (EP) patients. DESIGN, PARTICIPANTS, MEASURES: We analyzed 2013-2014 cross-sectional data from 509 surveyed adults in the Group Health Cooperative. Surveys were merged with plan enrollment, claims data, and electronic medical records. Medication adherence was calculated by the "Continuous Measure of Medication Gaps" (CMG) method. For Internet refill system use, patients were asked, "Have you used the health systems Internet site to refill any medications in the last 12 months?" LEP status was captured in the electronic medical record by a non-English primary language and a claims record of interpreter use in at least one clinical encounter between 2005 and 2012. We used multivariate linear regression models to examine Internet refill system use and medication adherence and compared the association between LEP and EP patients. RESULTS: Three hundred eighty-four patients (75%) had a calculable CMG: 134 EP and 250 LEP in the adherence analyses. In unadjusted analyses, LEP patients had lower use of the Internet refill system (p < .001) and lower adherence versus the EP group (p < .001). In multivariate analyses, LEP status (β = - 0.022, p = .047) was negatively associated with adherence, while use of the Internet refill system (β = 0.030, p = .002) was positively associated. In stratified models, use of Internet refills was positively associated with adherence, even when examining LEP (β = 0.029, p = .003) and EP patients (β = 0.027, p = .049) separately. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that LEP patients may be under-utilizing a beneficial Internet tool. Should our healthcare systems fail to ensure that LEP patients have full and meaningful access to Internet patient portals, we risk worsening healthcare disparities.
BACKGROUND: Use of an Internet portal to refill medicines positively affects medication adherence among English-speakers. No prior studies, however, have specifically examined the relationship between Internet refills and medication adherence among patients who are limited English proficient (LEP). OBJECTIVES: (1) Examine the relationship between Internet medication refill system use and medication adherence among linguistically diverse patients with chronic conditions and (2) compare this relationship between LEP and English-proficient (EP) patients. DESIGN, PARTICIPANTS, MEASURES: We analyzed 2013-2014 cross-sectional data from 509 surveyed adults in the Group Health Cooperative. Surveys were merged with plan enrollment, claims data, and electronic medical records. Medication adherence was calculated by the "Continuous Measure of Medication Gaps" (CMG) method. For Internet refill system use, patients were asked, "Have you used the health systems Internet site to refill any medications in the last 12 months?" LEP status was captured in the electronic medical record by a non-English primary language and a claims record of interpreter use in at least one clinical encounter between 2005 and 2012. We used multivariate linear regression models to examine Internet refill system use and medication adherence and compared the association between LEP and EPpatients. RESULTS: Three hundred eighty-four patients (75%) had a calculable CMG: 134 EP and 250 LEP in the adherence analyses. In unadjusted analyses, LEPpatients had lower use of the Internet refill system (p < .001) and lower adherence versus the EP group (p < .001). In multivariate analyses, LEP status (β = - 0.022, p = .047) was negatively associated with adherence, while use of the Internet refill system (β = 0.030, p = .002) was positively associated. In stratified models, use of Internet refills was positively associated with adherence, even when examining LEP (β = 0.029, p = .003) and EPpatients (β = 0.027, p = .049) separately. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that LEPpatients may be under-utilizing a beneficial Internet tool. Should our healthcare systems fail to ensure that LEPpatients have full and meaningful access to Internet patient portals, we risk worsening healthcare disparities.
Entities:
Keywords:
Digital divide; Health disparities; Limited English proficiency; Medication adherence; Patient portal
Authors: Gerardo Moreno; Elizabeth H Lin; Eva Chang; Ron L Johnson; Heidi Berthoud; Cam C Solomon; Leo S Morales Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2015-08-27 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Andrew J Karter; Melissa M Parker; Howard H Moffet; Ameena T Ahmed; Julie A Schmittdiel; Joe V Selby Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2009-06-03 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Douglas W Roblin; Thomas K Houston; Jeroan J Allison; Peter J Joski; Edmund R Becker Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2009-06-30 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Leah S Karliner; Andrew Auerbach; Anna Nápoles; Dean Schillinger; Dana Nickleach; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable Journal: Med Care Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: David P Nau; Douglas T Steinke; L Keoki Williams; Roger Austin; Jennifer Elston Lafata; George Divine; Manel Pladevall Journal: Ann Pharmacother Date: 2007-10-09 Impact factor: 3.154
Authors: Courtney R Lyles; Urmimala Sarkar; Dean Schillinger; James D Ralston; Jill Y Allen; Robert Nguyen; Andrew J Karter Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2015-09-02 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Urmimala Sarkar; Courtney R Lyles; Melissa M Parker; Jill Allen; Robert Nguyen; Howard H Moffet; Dean Schillinger; Andrew J Karter Journal: Med Care Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Angela Starkweather; Cynthia S Jacelon; Suzanne Bakken; Debra L Barton; Annette DeVito Dabbs; Susan G Dorsey; Barbara J Guthrie; Margaret M Heitkemper; Kathleen T Hickey; Teresa J Kelechi; Miyong T Kim; Jenna Marquard; Shirley M Moore; Nancy S Redeker; Rachel F Schiffman; Teresa M Ward; Lynn S Adams; Karen A Kehl; Jeri L Miller Journal: J Nurs Scholarsh Date: 2019-09-30 Impact factor: 3.176
Authors: Rachel O'Conor; Marina Arvanitis; Guisselle Wismer; Lauren Opsasnick; Angela Sanchez Muñoz; Joseph Kannry; Jenny J Lin; Darren Kaiser; Mary J Kwasny; Stephen D Persell; Ruth Parker; Alastair J J Wood; Alex D Federman; Michael S Wolf Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2019-06-28 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Alejandra Casillas; Cristina Valdovinos; Elizabeth Wang; Anshu Abhat; Carmen Mendez; Griselda Gutierrez; Jennifer Portz; Arleen Brown; Courtney R Lyles Journal: Front Digit Health Date: 2022-08-09
Authors: Rahul K Patel; Beth L Kreofsky; Katie M Morgan; Amy L Weaver; Jennifer L Fang; Jane E Brumbaugh Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2022-09-10 Impact factor: 3.225
Authors: Anshu Abhat; Alejandra Casillas; Anish Mahajan; Gerardo Moreno; Arleen F Brown; Sara Simmons; Peter Szilagyi Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2020-10-23 Impact factor: 5.428