| Literature DB >> 29600246 |
Angelita Gambuti1, Luigi Picariello1, Alessandra Rinaldi1,2, Luigi Moio1.
Abstract
Changes in phenolic compounds, chromatic characteristics, acetaldehyde, and protein-reactive tannins associated with oxidative aging were studied in Sangiovese wines with varied tannin T/anthocyanin A ratios. For this purpose, three Sangiovese vineyards located in Tuscany were considered in the 2016 vintage. To obtain wines with different T/A ratios, two red wines were produced from each vinification batch: a free run juice with a lower T/A ratio and a marc pressed wine with a higher T/A ratio. An overall of six wines with T/A ratios ranging between 5 and 23 were produced. An oxidation treatment (four saturation cycles) was applied to each wine. Average and initial oxygen consumption rates (OCR) were positively correlated to VRF/mA (vanilline reactive flavans/monomeric anthocyanins) and T/A ratios while OCRs were negatively related to the wine content in monomeric and total anthocyanins. The higher the A content was, the greater the loss of total and free anthocyanins. A significant lower production of polymeric pigments was detected in all pressed wines with respect to the correspondant free run one. A gradual decrease of tannin reactivity toward saliva proteins after the application of oxygen saturation cycles was detected. The results obtained in this experiment indicate that VRF/mA and T/A ratios are among the fundamental parameters to evaluate before choosing the antioxidant protection to be used and the right oxidation level to apply for a longer shelf-life of red wine.Entities:
Keywords: Sangiovese; aging; anthocyanins; astringency; oxidation; red wine; tannins
Year: 2018 PMID: 29600246 PMCID: PMC5862844 DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2018.00063
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Chem ISSN: 2296-2646 Impact factor: 5.221
Initial wine composition and initial and average oxygen consumption rates of Sangiovese wines.
| EtOH (%) | 14.79 ± 0.25 | 14.75 ± 0.09 | 14.35 ± 0.16 | 14.09 ± 0.28 | 12.32 ± 0.35 | 12.32 ± 0.05 |
| pH | 3.28 ± 0.02 | 3.36 ± 0.03 | 3.35 ± 0.05 | 3.40 ± 0.07 | 3.45 ± 0.02 | 3.46 ± 0.00 |
| free SO2 (mg/L) | 22.72 ± 0.5 | 21.44 ± 0.5 | 23.68 ± 3.6 | 22.72 ± 0.5 | 22.54 ± 0.2 | 22.72 ± 0.5 |
| total SO2 (mg/L) | 41.6 ± 0.9 | 45.44 ± 0.9 | 50.88 ± 0.5 | 44.16 ± 2.7 | 41.04 ± 1.9 | 43.48 ± 1.8 |
| total acetaldehyde (mg/L) | 19.14 ± 0.30 | 18.57 ± 0.33 | 11.48 ± 0.43 | 12.78 ± 0.06 | 16.41 ± 0.24 | 26.55 ± 0.27 |
| iron (mg/L) | 0.438 ± 0.023 | 0.228 ± 0.009 | 0.246 ± 0.011 | 0.065 ± 0.003 | 0.935 ± 0.038 | 0.279 ± 0.021 |
| copper (mg/L) | 0.208 ± 0.008 | 0.296 ± 0.011 | 0.095 ± 0.004 | 0.167 ± 0.005 | 0.017 ± 0.001 | 0.246 ± 0.021 |
| VRF/mon anth | 10.6 | 11.2 | 9.1 | 10.2 | 30.5 | 38.9 |
| T/A | 5.9 | 8.6 | 4.9 | 6.2 | 13.3 | 22.7 |
| initial OCR (mg/L/day) | 3.620 ± 0.007 | 3.775 ± 0.503 | 3.545 ± 0.282 | 3.598 ± 0.798 | 4.608 ± 0.49 | 3.790 ± 0.003 |
| average OCR (mg/L/day) | 1.101 ± 0.014 | 1.296 ± 0.01 | 1.402 ± 0.048 | 1.355 ± 0.084 | 2.876 ± 1.031 | 3.302 ± 0.022 |
HAf, High Anthocyanins level from free run juice; Hap, High Anthocyanins level from pressed run juice; MAf, Medium Anthocyanins level from free run juice; Map, Medium Anthocyanins level from pressed run juice; LAf, Low Anthocyanins level from free run juice; Lap, Low Anthocyanins level from pressed run juice.
T/A, BSA-reactive tannins (mg/L)/total anthocyanins (mg/L).
Figure 1Average oxygen concentrations (mg/L) measured in each wine sample after the first (A) (SAT1), the second (B) (SAT2), the third (C) (SAT3), and the fourth (D) (SAT4) saturation.
Significant correlation coefficients between initial and average oxygen consumption rates and the chemical composition of the Sangiovese wines before the oxidation (p < 0.05).
| monomeric anthocyanins (mg/L) | −0.660 | −0.964 |
| total anthocyanins (mg/L) | −0.560 | −0.950 |
| LPP+SPP | −0.289 | ns |
| VRF (mg/L) | 0.194 | −0.207 |
| BSA reactive tannins (mg/L) | −0.146 | −0.469 |
| SPI (g/L) | ns | ns |
| abs 420 | −0.333 | −0.732 |
| abs 520 | −0.366 | −0.748 |
| abs 620 | −0.219 | −0.546 |
| CI | −0.337 | −0.721 |
| hue | ns | ns |
| VRF/mon. anth. | 0.592 | 0.988 |
| T/A | 0.392 | 0.926 |
| iron (mg/L) | ns | ns |
| copper (mg/L) | ns | ns |
| EtOH | −0.689 | ns |
| pH | ns | ns |
| free SO2 (mg/L) | ns | ns |
| tot SO2 (mg/L) | ns | ns |
| acetaldehyde (mg/L) | 0.113 | 0.598 |
T/A, BSA-reactive tannins (mg/L)/total anthocyanins (mg/L); ns, not significant.
Figure 2Total (A), sum of monomeric (B) and polymeric (C) pigments (mg/L of malvidin−3-monoglucoside) of wines before and after each saturation cycle.
Figure 3BSA reactive tannins (mg/L of catechin) (A), SPI (mg/L of gallic acid equivalent GAE) (B), and Vanilline Reactive Flavans (VRF) (mg/L of catechin) (C) of wines before and after each saturation cycle.