Atsuya Takeda1, Yuichiro Tsurugai1, Naoko Sanuki1, Tatsuji Enomoto2, Masaharu Shinkai3, Tomikazu Mizuno4, Yousuke Aoki1, Yohei Oku1, Takeshi Akiba1,5, Yu Hara2,3, Etsuo Kunieda5. 1. Radiation Oncology Center, Ofuna Chuo Hospital, Kamakura, Kanagawa, Japan. 2. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Ofuna Chuo Hospital, Kamakura, Kanagawa, Japan. 3. Department of Pulmonology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan. 4. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Ofuna Chuo Hospital, Kamakura, Kanagawa, Japan. 5. Department of Radiation Oncology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Radiation pneumonitis is a critical pulmonary toxicity after irradiation of the lung. Macrolides including clarithromycin (CAM) are antibiotics. They also have immunomodulatory properties and are used to treat respiratory inflammatory diseases. Radiation pneumonitis has similar pathology to them. Adverse reactions to macrolides are few and self-limited. We thus administered CAM to patients with high-risk factors for radiation pneumonitis, and retrospectively investigated whether CAM mitigated radiation pneumonitis following stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). METHODS: Among consecutive patients treated with SBRT, we retrospectively examined lung cancer patients treated with a total dose of 40-60 Gy in 5-10 fractions and followed ≥6 months. Since January 2014, CAM has been administered in patients with pretreatment predictable radiation pneumonitis high-risk factors, including idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIPs), and elevated Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) and/or surfactant protein D (SP-D), and in patients developing early onset radiation pneumonitis. RESULTS: Five hundred and eighty eligible patients were identified and divided into 445 patients during the non-CAM-administration era (non-CAM-era) (before December 2013) and 136 patients during the CAM-administration era (CAM-era) (after January 2014). Median follow-up durations were 38.0 and 13.9 months, respectively. The rates of radiation pneumonitis ≥ grade 2 and ≥ grade 3 were significantly lower in CAM-era (grade ≥2, 16% vs. 9.6%, P=0.047; grade ≥3, 3.8% vs. 0.73%, P=0.037). For patients with the pretreatment predictable high-risk factors, the rate of radiation pneumonitis ≥ grade 3 was significantly lower, and that of grade ≥2 had a lower tendency (grade ≥3, 7.2% vs. 0%, P=0.011; grade ≥2, 21% vs. 9.6%, P=0.061). For patients developing early onset radiation pneumonitis, the rate of radiation pneumonitis ≥ grade 3 was also significantly lower (23% vs. 0%, P<0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that dose-volumetric factor, the pretreatment predictable high-risk factors and non-CAM-administration era were significantly associated with or trended toward radiation pneumonitis ≥ grade 2 and ≥ grade 3. CONCLUSIONS: CAM mitigated radiation pneumonitis following SBRT. The efficacy of CAM should be confirmed in prospective studies.
BACKGROUND: Radiation pneumonitis is a critical pulmonary toxicity after irradiation of the lung. Macrolides including clarithromycin (CAM) are antibiotics. They also have immunomodulatory properties and are used to treat respiratory inflammatory diseases. Radiation pneumonitis has similar pathology to them. Adverse reactions to macrolides are few and self-limited. We thus administered CAM to patients with high-risk factors for radiation pneumonitis, and retrospectively investigated whether CAM mitigated radiation pneumonitis following stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). METHODS: Among consecutive patients treated with SBRT, we retrospectively examined lung cancer patients treated with a total dose of 40-60 Gy in 5-10 fractions and followed ≥6 months. Since January 2014, CAM has been administered in patients with pretreatment predictable radiation pneumonitis high-risk factors, including idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIPs), and elevated Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) and/or surfactant protein D (SP-D), and in patients developing early onset radiation pneumonitis. RESULTS: Five hundred and eighty eligible patients were identified and divided into 445 patients during the non-CAM-administration era (non-CAM-era) (before December 2013) and 136 patients during the CAM-administration era (CAM-era) (after January 2014). Median follow-up durations were 38.0 and 13.9 months, respectively. The rates of radiation pneumonitis ≥ grade 2 and ≥ grade 3 were significantly lower in CAM-era (grade ≥2, 16% vs. 9.6%, P=0.047; grade ≥3, 3.8% vs. 0.73%, P=0.037). For patients with the pretreatment predictable high-risk factors, the rate of radiation pneumonitis ≥ grade 3 was significantly lower, and that of grade ≥2 had a lower tendency (grade ≥3, 7.2% vs. 0%, P=0.011; grade ≥2, 21% vs. 9.6%, P=0.061). For patients developing early onset radiation pneumonitis, the rate of radiation pneumonitis ≥ grade 3 was also significantly lower (23% vs. 0%, P<0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that dose-volumetric factor, the pretreatment predictable high-risk factors and non-CAM-administration era were significantly associated with or trended toward radiation pneumonitis ≥ grade 2 and ≥ grade 3. CONCLUSIONS: CAM mitigated radiation pneumonitis following SBRT. The efficacy of CAM should be confirmed in prospective studies.