Literature DB >> 29599720

Ethnopharmacology-A Bibliometric Analysis of a Field of Research Meandering Between Medicine and Food Science?

Andy Wai Kan Yeung1, Michael Heinrich2, Atanas G Atanasov3,4.   

Abstract

Background: The research into bioactive natural products of medicinal plants has a long tradition, but ethnopharmacology as a well-defined field of research has a relatively short history, only dating back 50 years. Aims: With the fast development of this field and its global importance especially in the fast developing economies of Asia it is timely to assess the most influential articles (as measured by citations) and to identify important drivers and research trends in this field.
Methods: Scopus was searched to identify relevant articles which were assessed by all three authors. The 100 most cited articles were identified and analyzed. Bibliometric software (VOSviewer) was utilized to supplement the analysis and to generate a term map that visualized the citation patterns of the 100 articles containing different terms.
Results: Forty-four of the 100 articles are reviews. On average, each of the 100 articles had 632 citations and since publication was cited 43 times annually. The four core journals were Journal of Ethnopharmacology (n = 17), Food Chemistry (n = 7), Life Sciences (n = 5), and Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry (n = 4). Anti-oxidant effects appeared to be a recurring and highly cited topic, whereas the links into drug discovery and neuropharmacology seemed to be less strong. Numerous medicinal plants and functional foods were the foci of research, and the foci shifted when comparing pre-2000 and post-2000 publications (with the later involving a broader spectrum of plants and foods and a wider range of biological effects). Contributions largely came from Asia, and also from the Americas, Africa, and Oceania, besides Europe.
Conclusion: We have identified and analyzed the 100 most-cited articles in ethnopharmacology. Within 50 years the field has gained a profile and while conventionally often linked to "traditional knowledge," drug discovery and some areas of pharmacology, this analysis highlights its emerging importance in the context of disease prevention (food science), but also the development of research driven by the needs and interests of the fast developing economies most notably of Asia.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bibliometrics; ethnobotany; ethnomedicine; ethnopharmacology; folk medicine; medicinal plant; traditional medicine

Year:  2018        PMID: 29599720      PMCID: PMC5862826          DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2018.00215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Pharmacol        ISSN: 1663-9812            Impact factor:   5.810


The top papers in ethnopharmacology display a crossover of medical and food science.

Introduction

Historically, there are abundant and diversified studies reporting on the biological, pharmacological, and medical uses of plants, fungi, and other organisms within a local or traditional context (Heinrich and Jäger, 2015). Many pharmaceutical agents commonly used today originate from medicinal plants, such as aspirin, morphine, pilocarpine, and quinine (Gilani, 2005), and more recently galanthamine, peplin, and Crofelmer (from Croton lechleri Müll.Arg.; Heinrich, 2013). Moreover, plants continue to be an important source for modern drug discovery aiming the development of new therapeutics (Atanasov et al., 2015). Instead of being dominated by driving forces from the “Western World,” investigations in ethnopharmacology have next to European (Vogl et al., 2013) also strong global contributions from the Asian, African, and native American traditional medicine (Sheng-Ji, 2001; Steenkamp et al., 2004), such as those originating from China (Rozema et al., 2012), India (Booker et al., 2012), Southeast Asia, for example, Vietnam (Tran et al., 2015), and Mexico (Heinrich, 2000) and several South and Central American countries. However, ethnopharmacology as a well-defined field of research has a relatively short history, dating back about 50 years only (Heinrich and Jäger, 2015). This offers an opportunity to make an overall assessment and identify important research trends in this field. With such a rich and diversified literature, it is worthwhile to conduct a bibliometric study that examines the top 100 most-cited articles within the research field of ethnopharmacology. Similar studies that reported the 100 most-cited articles have been published for numerous research fields in life science including emergency medicine (Tsai et al., 2006), neuroimaging (Kim et al., 2016), and neuroscience (Yeung et al., 2017a). This allows an understanding of the research trends in the last decades and the ongoing “hot topics.” To the best of the authors' knowledge, no such bibliometric report has been published for ethnopharmacology. The current study, therefore, aims to identify and analyze the 100 most-cited ethnopharmacology articles. The specific objectives of this analysis were: To understand what key research themes were relevant (as indicated by citations) in ethnopharmacology? To appreciate what we can learn from the highly cited papers in this field in the context of ethnopharmacology's wider and changing relevance within the natural sciences? To identify who and what has driven this research? To assess what we can learn from this for the future development of the field?

Materials and methods

Data sources

Scopus was chosen as the source of data since it has a broader coverage on pharmacology journals compared to Web of Science (Gorraiz and Schloegl, 2008). It is a web-based, multidisciplinary database hosted by Elsevier, and it provides bibliometric data of peer-reviewed articles published in the life, social, physical, and health sciences. In November 2017, we searched Scopus to identify articles with the following string: TITLE-ABS-KEY (ethnopharmacology OR ethnopharmacological OR ethnobotany OR ethnobotanical OR ethnomedicine OR ethnomedical OR “medicinal plant” OR “folk medicine” OR “traditional medicine”). This string searched for articles that contain any of these terms or phrases in their title, abstract, or keywords. The articles were sorted by citation count in descending order. All authors (AWKY, MH, and AGA) screened the titles and abstracts of the articles to exclude those irrelevant to ethnopharmacology in order to finally include the 100 most cited articles. In the current study, we considered as ethnopharmacology papers those focused on traditional medical use or biological and pharmacological activities of plants, fungi, and other organisms used locally or traditionally as a medicine or to improve health. The definition also includes studies aimed to either improving local healthcare through developing products based on such knowledge or studies in the context of drug discovery/development from natural sources which were based on biological resources with a clear and well-defined local or traditional use. We excluded papers which simply contained some of the string keywords but the major focus of the article was not related to ethnopharmacology. These considerations are in line with the definition of ethnopharmacology adopted by the Journal of Ethnopharmacology, Frontiers in Pharmacology (section Ethnopharmacology) and the ConSEFS advisory group (Heinrich et al., 2018). No additional restrictions were placed on the type of research model (in vivo/in vitro), article type (e.g., research article, review, editorial, letter, etc.), or publication language.

Data extraction

The 100 most-cited articles were evaluated and the following information extracted: (1) publication year; (2) journal title; (3) journal impact factor at the time of publication; (4) SCImago Journal Rank at the time of publication (SJR indicator, which weighs citations by the importance or prestige of the citing journals); (5) total citation count; (6) adjusted citation count (i.e., citation count per year since publication); (7) field-weighted citation impact (FWCI); (8) authorship; and (9) article type. In addition, the scopes of the involved journals were classified into nine categories: clinical, ethnopharmacology, and medicinal plant research, food research (chemistry etc.), multidisciplinary journals, microbiology and biotechnology, pharmacology and pharmacy, phytochemistry with a link to traditional uses, plant science, and social sciences. Bradford's law of scattering was applied to the 100 most-cited articles to investigate if a few core journals accounted for publishing one-third of these articles (Vickery, 1948; Yeung et al., 2017c). Based on Bradford's law, three groups of journals should contribute to the publication of the 100 articles when it is equally divided into three portions, whereas the number of journals within the groups should be in the ratio of 1:n:n2. For instance, if one journal publishes 33 articles and the next 33 articles are published by four journals, the remaining 33 articles should be published by 16 journals (1:4:16).

Statistical analysis

We tested if years since publication would influence the number of citations of the articles. It was tested by Pearson's correlation test. Test result with p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Term map

Words in the titles and abstracts of these 100 articles were parsed, analyzed and visualized by VOSviewer (Van Eck and Waltman, 2009), a bibliometric software that visualizes results as bubble maps. Each bubble represented a term or phrase. Irrelevant terms were manually screened and removed (Heersmink et al., 2011; Yeung et al., 2017c). The bubble size indicated its frequency of occurrence. The bubble color indicated the averaged citation counts received by articles containing the term or phrase. A line connects two bubbles if they co-occurred in any of the 100 articles. If two terms co-occurred more frequently, the two bubbles will be in closer proximity. The term map visualizes terms that appeared in at least five of the 100 articles.

Results and discussion

The 100 most-cited ethnopharmacology articles were mainly original articles (n = 51) and reviews (n = 44), with a few conference papers (n = 3) and short surveys (n = 2). Since such a bibliometric assessment is not available for general pharmacology, no direct comparison is possible. However, one can compare the size of the respective fields. A search in Scopus replacing our pre-defined search terms with different ones has revealed that there are 181,207 papers tagged as “pharmacology,” 4,998 papers as “neuropharmacology,” 3,450 papers as “ethnopharmacology,” and 39,848 papers as “traditional medicine/ethnopharmacology.” The number of citations received by these 100 articles ranged from 353 to 5,253 (mean ± SD: 631.7 ± 560.0, cumulative total citations = 63,166; Table 1). The adjusted citation count (i.e., citation count per year since publication) ranged from 10.8 to 276.5 (mean ± SD: 43.3 ± 31.2, Table 1). Regardless of total citation count or adjusted citation count, Eisenberg et al. (1998) published the top-ranked article, a national survey reporting trends in alternative medicines use in the United States.
Table 1

List of 100 most-cited ethnopharmacology articles ranked according to their total citation counts.

RankYearAuthors and titleJournalImpact factorSJRTotal citation countAdjusted citation countField-weighted citation impact
11998Eisenberg D.M., Davis R.B., Ettner S.L., Appel S., Wilkey S., Van Rompay M., Kessler R.C. Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990-1997: Results of a follow-up national surveyJournal of the American Medical Association9.6NA5,253276.5124.2
2*1999Kähkönen MP, Hopia A.I., Vuorela H.J., Rauha J.-P., Pihlaja K., Kujala T.S., Heinonen M. Antioxidant activity of plant extracts containing phenolic compoundsJournal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry1.50.92,054114.112.2
3*1998Velioglu Y.S., Mazza G., Gao L., Oomah B.D. Antioxidant activity and total phenolics in selected fruits, vegetables, and grain productsJournal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry1.5NA2,034107.17.0
4*1985Klayman D.L. Qinghaosu (artemisinin): An antimalarial drug from ChinaScience10.9NA1,62350.7NA
5*2001Zheng W., Wang S.Y. Antioxidant activity and phenolic compounds in selected herbsJournal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry1.61.11,34584.19.9
61999Hammer K.A., Carson C.F., Riley T.V. Antimicrobial activity of essential oils and other plant extractsJournal of Applied Microbiology1.61.11,23268.45.1
72004Cai Y., Luo Q., Sun M., Corke H. Antioxidant activity and phenolic compounds of 112 traditional Chinese medicinal plants associated with anticancerLife Sciences2.20.91,22494.211.3
8*2003Wasser S. Medicinal mushrooms as a source of antitumor and immunomodulating polysaccharidesApplied Microbiology and Biotechnology2.11.01,16283.014.5
92002Grover J.K., Yadav S., Vats V. Medicinal plants of India with anti-diabetic potentialJournal of Ethnopharmacology1.20.997765.18.1
102004Miliauskas G., Venskutonis P.R., Van Beek T.A. Screening of radical scavenging activity of some medicinal and aromatic plant extractsFood Chemistry1.61.190369.513.8
11*2002Koleva I.I., Van Beek T.A., Linssen J.P.H., De Groot A., Evstatieva L.N. Screening of plant extracts for antioxidant activity: A comparative study on three testing methodsPhytochemical Analysis1.50.887958.65.2
122005Cragg G.M., Newman D.J. Plants as a source of anti-cancer agentsJournal of Ethnopharmacology1.60.882568.84.9
132004Devasagayam T.P.A., Tilak J.C., Boloor K.K., Sane K.S., Ghaskadbi S.S., Lele R.D. Free radicals and antioxidants in human health: Current status and future prospectsJournal of Association of Physicians of India00.281963.05.0
14*2003Kalemba D., Kunicka A. Antibacterial and antifungal properties of essential oilsCurrent Medicinal Chemistry4.51.680457.43.0
15*1996Haslam E. Natural polyphenols (vegetable tannins) as drugs: possible modes of actionJournal of Natural Products1.3NA79738.06.8
16*1992Block E. The organosulfur chemistry of the genus Allium—implications for the organic chemistry of sulfurAngewandte Chemie International Edition6.0NA77030.8NA
172005Edeoga H.O., Okwu D.E., Mbaebie B.O. Phytochemical constituents of some Nigerian medicinal plantsAfrican Journal of Biotechnology00.276663.83.5
182008Harvey A.L. Natural products in drug discoveryDrug Discovery Today6.72.073681.88.5
192001Fabricant D.S., Farnsworth N.R. The value of plants used in traditional medicine for drug discoveryEnvironmental Health Perspectives3.21.472045.02.8
201985Farnsworth N.R., Akerele O., Bingel A.S., Soejarto D.D., Guo Z. Medicinal plants in therapyBulletin of the World Health Organization1.8NA70522.0NA
212001Rates S.M.K. Plants as source of drugsToxicon1.60.668943.11.6
22*2007Aggarwal B.B., Sundaram C., Malani N., Ichikawa H. Curcumin: the Indian solid gold.Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology0.70.366966.99.5
232005Ríos J.L., Recio M.C. Medicinal plants and antimicrobial activityJournal of Ethnopharmacology1.60.866555.43.7
242006Gurib-Fakim A. Medicinal plants: Traditions of yesterday and drugs of tomorrowMolecular Aspects of Medicine02.265159.24.1
252005Balunas M.J., Kinghorn A.D. Drug discovery from medicinal plantsLife Sciences2.60.964153.411.7
261997Parmar V.S., Jain S.C., Bisht K.S., Jain R., Taneja P., Jha A., Tyagi O.D., Prasad A.K., Wengel J., Olsen C.E., Boll P.M. Phytochemistry of the genus PiperPhytochemistry1.2NA62031.03.4
272004Sparg S.G., Light M.E., Van Staden J. Biological activities and distribution of plant saponinsJournal of Ethnopharmacology1.50.861547.33.4
282004Amarowicz R., Pegg R.B., Rahimi-Moghaddam P., Barl B., Weil J.A. Free-radical scavenging capacity and antioxidant activity of selected plant species from the Canadian prairiesFood Chemistry1.61.159545.87.9
292006Djeridane A., Yousfi M., Nadjemi B., Boutassouna D., Stocker P., Vidal N. Antioxidant activity of some Algerian medicinal plants extracts containing phenolic compoundsFood Chemistry2.51.459353.911.2
302000Nascimento G.G.F., Locatelli J., Freitas P.C., Silva G.L. Antibacterial activity of plant extracts and phytochemicals on antibiotic-resistant bacteriaBrazilian Journal of Microbiology00.259134.80.6
312003Petersen M., Simmonds M.S.J. Rosmarinic acidPhytochemistry1.90.959042.13.5
322006Cos P., Vlietinck A.J., Berghe D.V., Maes L. Anti-infective potential of natural products: how to develop a stronger in vitro 'proof-of-concept'Journal of Ethnopharmacology1.71.058953.54.5
332010Lobo V., Patil A., Phatak A., Chandra N. Free radicals, antioxidants and functional foods: impact on human healthPharmacognosy Reviews00.258683.74.5
342007Lansky E.P., Newman R.A. Punica granatum (pomegranate) and its potential for prevention and treatment of inflammation and cancerJournal of Ethnopharmacology2.10.958158.16.6
352001Ahmad I., Beg A.Z. Antimicrobial and phytochemical studies on 45 Indian medicinal plants against multi-drug resistant human pathogensJournal of Ethnopharmacology0.80.756835.52.6
361998Hande K.R. Etoposide: Four decades of development of a topoisomerase II inhibitorEuropean Journal of Cancer2.8NA56629.83.7
371998Ahmad I., Mehmood Z., Mohammad F. Screening of some Indian medicinal plants for their antimicrobial propertiesJournal of Ethnopharmacology0.6NA56429.71.2
38*1989Bailey C.J., Day C. Traditional plant medicines as treatments for diabetesDiabetes Care2.4NA56020.0NA
392006Katalinic V., Milos M., Kulisic T., Jukic M. Screening of 70 medicinal plant extracts for antioxidant capacity and total phenolsFood Chemistry2.51.455750.615.5
40*1999Wasser S.P., Weis A.L. Therapeutic effects of substances occurring in higher basidiomycetes mushrooms: a modern perspectiveCritical Reviews in Immunology5.83.754130.12.2
41*2001Yildirim A., Mavi A., Kara A.A. Determination of antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of Rumex crispus L. extractsJournal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry1.61.154033.84.6
422010Chen S., Yao H., Han J., Liu C., Song J., Shi L., Zhu Y., Ma X., Gao T., Pang X., Luo K., Li Y., Li X., Jia X., Lin Y., Leon C. Validation of the ITS2 region as a novel DNA barcode for identifying medicinal plant speciesPLoS ONE4.52.753075.724.3
43*1969Chihara G., Maeda Y., Hamuro J., Sasaki T., Fukuoka F. inhibition of mouse sarcoma 180 by polysaccharides from Lentinus edodes (Berk.) sing.NatureNANA51910.8NA
442003Yeh G.Y., Eisenberg D.M., Kaptchuk T.J., Phillips R.S. Systematic review of herbs and dietary supplements for glycemic control in diabetesDiabetes Care7.63.250736.25.8
451999Surh Y.-J. Molecular mechanisms of chemopreventive effects of selected dietary and medicinal phenolic substancesMutation Research—Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis01.050728.29.9
46*2008Nassiri Asl M., Hosseinzadeh H. Review of pharmacological effects of Glycyrrhiza sp. and its bioactive compoundsPhytotherapy Research1.80.750556.16.9
472008Ali B.H., Blunden G., Tanira M.O., Nemmar A. Some phytochemical, pharmacological and toxicological properties of ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe): a review of recent researchFood and Chemical Toxicology2.40.850055.65.6
48*2001Banskota A.H., Tezuka Y., Kadota S. Recent progress in pharmacological research of propolisPhytotherapy Research0.70.449931.22.3
492005Lindequist U., Niedermeyer T.H.J., Jülich W.-D. The pharmacological potential of mushroomsEvidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine00.049140.99.2
502004Li W.L., Zheng H.C., Bukuru J., De Kimpe N. Natural medicines used in the traditional Chinese medical system for therapy of diabetes mellitusJournal of Ethnopharmacology1.50.848637.42.8
511988Rios J.L., Recio M.C., Villar A. Screening methods for natural products with antimicrobial activity: a review of the literatureJournal of Ethnopharmacology0.5NA48216.6NA
521998Eloff J.N. Which extractant should be used for the screening and isolation of antimicrobial components from plants?Journal of Ethnopharmacology0.6NA48125.32.4
532002Roth B.L., Baner K., Westkaemper R., Siebert D., Rice K.C., Steinberg S., Ernsberger P., Rothman R.B. Salvinorin A: a potent naturally occurring nonnitrogenous κ opioid selective agonistProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America10.77.247831.93.6
542009Wagner H., Ulrich-Merzenich G. Synergy research: approaching a new generation of phytopharmaceuticalsPhytomedicine2.20.947859.815.9
552004Chattopadhyay I., Biswas K., Bandyopadhyay U., Banerjee R.K. Turmeric and curcumin: biological actions and medicinal applicationsCurrent Science0.70.346936.11.3
562002Biswas K., Chattopadhyay I., Banerjee R.K., Bandyopadhyay U. Biological activities and medicinal properties of neem (Azadirachta indica)Current Science0.60.346531.01.5
571998Ernst E. Harmless herbs? A review of the recent literatureAmerican Journal of Medicine4.5NA45824.121.0
582002Raskin I., Ribnicky D.M., Komarnytsky S., Ilic N., Poulev A., Borisjuk N., Brinker A., Moreno D.A., Ripoll C., Yakoby N., O'Neal J.M., Cornwell T., Pastor I., Fridlender B. Plants and human health in the twenty-first centuryTrends in Biotechnology6.31.745630.49.8
592003Gülçin I., Oktay M., Kireçci E., Küfrevioglu Ö.I. Screening of antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of anise (Pimpinella anisum L.) seed extractsFood Chemistry1.30.945432.47.1
602002Choi C.W., Kim S.C., Hwang S.S., Choi B.K., Ahn H.J., Lee M.Y., Park S.H., Kim S.K. Antioxidant activity and free radical scavenging capacity between Korean medicinal plants and flavonoids by assay-guided comparisonPlant Science1.60.844629.73.5
612000Scartezzini P., Speroni E. Review on some plants of Indian traditional medicine with antioxidant activityJournal of Ethnopharmacology0.60.544426.12.7
62*2003Chainani-Wu N. Safety and anti-inflammatory activity of curcumin: a component of tumeric (Curcuma longa)Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine1.00.444331.614.2
631999Gübitz G.M., Mittelbach M., Trabi M. Exploitation of the tropical oil seed plant Jatropha curcas L.Bioresource Technology0.90.744224.62.6
642003Strobel G.A. Endophytes as sources of bioactive productsMicrobes and Infection3.81.744231.61.5
652008Wang L., Zhou G.-B., Liu P., Song J.-H., Liang Y., Yan X.-J., Xu F., Wang B.-S., Mao J.-H., Shen Z.-X., Chen S.-J., Chen Z. Dissection of mechanisms of Chinese medicinal formula Realgar-indigo naturalis as an effective treatment for promyelocytic leukemiaProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America9.46.943047.85.0
66*2002Kronenberg F., Fugh-Berman A. Complementary and alternative medicine for menopausal symptoms: a review of randomized, controlled trialsAnnals of Internal Medicine11.54.142928.619.7
672000Calixto J.B. Efficacy, safety, quality control, marketing and regulatory guidelines for herbal medicines (phytotherapeutic agents)Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research0.70.442925.21.7
682000Stermitz F.R., Lorenz P., Tawara J.N., Zenewicz L.A., Lewis K. Synergy in a medicinal plant: antimicrobial action of berberine potentiated by 5'-methoxyhydnocarpin, a multidrug pump inhibitorProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America10.87.842525.03.8
692006Pourmorad F., Hosseinimehr S.J., Shahabimajd N. Antioxidant activity, phenol and flavonoid contents of some selected Iranian medicinal plantsAfrican Journal of Biotechnology00.342338.53.9
702005Kanadaswami C., Lee L.-T., Lee P.-P.H., Hwang J.-J., Ke F.-C., Huang Y.-T., Lee M.-T. The antitumor activities of flavonoidsIn Vivo1.10.542335.310.0
712007Anwar F., Latif S., Ashraf M., Gilani A.H. Moringa oleifera: a food plant with multiple medicinal usesPhytotherapy Research1.50.641741.72.5
722002Sabu M.C., Kuttan R. Anti-diabetic activity of medicinal plants and its relationship with their antioxidant propertyJournal of Ethnopharmacology1.20.940827.24.0
73*2000Mishra L.-C., Singh B.B., Dagenais S. Scientific basis for the therapeutic use of Withania somnifera (ashwagandha): a reviewAlternative Medicine Review0.00.340824.03.1
742003Javanmardi J., Stushnoff C., Locke E., Vivanco J.M. Antioxidant activity and total phenolic content of Iranian Ocimum accessionsFood Chemistry1.30.940528.95.0
752000Moreno M.I.N., Isla M.I., Sampietro A.R., Vattuone M.A. Comparison of the free radical-scavenging activity of propolis from several regions of ArgentinaJournal of Ethnopharmacology0.60.540323.71.6
762002Lu Y., Yeap Foo L. Polyphenolics of Salvia—a reviewPhytochemistry1.71.040226.82.0
772006Cai Y.-Z., Mei Sun, Jie Xing, Luo Q., Corke H. Structure-radical scavenging activity relationships of phenolic compounds from traditional Chinese medicinal plantsLife Sciences2.41.039936.38.3
78*1988Grunberger D., Banerjee R., Eisinger K., Oltz E.M., Efros L., Caldwell M., Estevez V., Nakanishi K. Preferential cytotoxicity on tumor cells by caffeic acid phenethyl ester isolated from propolisExperientia1.2NA39813.7NA
79*2004O'Neill P.M., Posner G.H. A medicinal chemistry perspective on artemisinin and related endoperoxidesJournal of Medicinal Chemistry5.12.039730.58.6
802006Aggarwal S., Ichikawa H., Takada Y., Sandur S.K., Shishodia S., Aggarwal B.B. Curcumin (diferuloylmethane) down-regulates expression of cell proliferation and antiapoptotic and metastatic gene products through suppression of IκBα kinase and Akt activationMolecular Pharmacology4.52.639135.516.2
812006Prabuseenivasan S., Jayakumar M., Ignacimuthu S. In vitro antibacterial activity of some plant essential oilsBMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine0.00.539035.510.1
822003Pervaiz S. Resveratrol: From grapevines to mammalian biologyFASEB Journal7.23.738827.76.2
83*1988Sparnins V.L., Barany G., Wattenberg L.W. Effects of organosulfur compounds from garlic and onions on benzo[a]pyrene-induced neoplasia and glutathione s-transferase activity in the mouseCarcinogenesis2.6NA38113.1NA
84*2004van der Heijden R., Jacobs D.I., Snoeijer W., Hallard D., Verpoorte R. The Catharanthus alkaloids: pharmacognosy and biotechnologyCurrent Medicinal Chemistry4.41.737929.24.6
851998Alarcon-Aguilara F.J., Roman-Ramos R., Perez-Gutierrez S., Aguilar-Contreras A., Contreras-Weber C.C., Flores-Saenz J.L. Study of the anti-hyperglycemic effect of plants used as antidiabeticsJournal of Ethnopharmacology0.6NA37919.91.5
86*2005Shishodia S., Sethi G., Aggarwal B.B. Curcumin: getting back to the rootsAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2.01.037631.320.7
872004Grover J.K., Yadav S.P. Pharmacological actions and potential uses of Momordica charantia: a reviewJournal of Ethnopharmacology1.50.837528.82.4
881998Chatterjee S.S., Bhattacharya S.K., Wonnemann M., Singer A., Müller W.E. Hyperforin as a possible antidepressant component of hypericum extractsLife Sciences2.0NA37519.717.0
891997Vaya J., Belinky P.A., Aviram M. Antioxidant constituents from licorice roots: isolation, structure elucidation and antioxidative capacity toward LDL oxidationFree Radical Biology and Medicine3.6NA37318.74.0
902000Liu F., Ng T.B. Antioxidative and free radical scavenging activities of selected medicinal herbsLife Sciences1.90.737121.84.6
912002Holetz F.B., Pessini G.L., Sanches N.R., Cortez D.A.G., Nakamura C.V., Dias Filho B.P. Screening of some plants used in the Brazilian folk medicine for the treatment of infectious diseasesMemorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz0.70.536924.62.6
921998Heinrich M., Ankli A., Frei B., Weimann C., Sticher O. Medicinal plants in Mexico: healers' consensus and cultural importanceSocial Science and Medicine0.0NA36719.33.1
93*2004Smit A.J. Medicinal and pharmaceutical uses of seaweed natural products: a reviewJournal of Applied Phycology0.80.536728.22.2
942006Li Y., Guo C., Yang J., Wei J., Xu J., Cheng S. Evaluation of antioxidant properties of pomegranate peel extract in comparison with pomegranate pulp extractFood Chemistry2.51.436633.37.4
95*2003Normile D. The new face of traditional Chinese medicineScience29.811.236125.87.5
962005Salem M.L. Immunomodulatory and therapeutic properties of the Nigella sativa L. seedInternational Immunopharmacology2.10.836030.01.7
972001Araújo C.A.C., Leon L.L. Biological activities of Curcuma longa LMemorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz0.70.435822.43.1
982001Srinivasan D., Nathan S., Suresh T., Lakshmana Perumalsamy P. Antimicrobial activity of certain Indian medicinal plants used in folkloric medicineJournal of Ethnopharmacology0.80.735622.31.7
992009López-Lázaro M. Distribution and biological activities of the flavonoid luteolinMini-Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry3.01.035444.311.4
1002009Ravindran J., Prasad S., Aggarwal B.B. Curcumin and cancer cells: How many ways can curry kill tumor cells selectively?AAPS Journal3.61.435344.18.0

NA, not available. Impact factor and SJR were firstly available in 1975 and 1999, respectively. Hence, there are articles with impact factor or SJR labeled as “NA.” An asterisk “*” indicates that the article was not freely available to the authors through various schemes at the time of the literature analysis (November 2017).

List of 100 most-cited ethnopharmacology articles ranked according to their total citation counts. NA, not available. Impact factor and SJR were firstly available in 1975 and 1999, respectively. Hence, there are articles with impact factor or SJR labeled as “NA.” An asterisk “*” indicates that the article was not freely available to the authors through various schemes at the time of the literature analysis (November 2017). The 100 articles were published in 59 journals with impact factors ranging from 0 to 29.8 (mean ± SD: 2.7 ± 3.8). Half of the 100 articles were published either in a journal dedicated to ethnopharmacology and medicinal plant research (n = 28) or a clinical journal (n = 19; Table 2). Only one article was published in a social sciences journal. Four core journals published 33 articles; 21 and 34 journals, respectively, published the next 33 and the last 33 articles (4:21:34). This indicated that the distribution of publications did not fulfill Bradford's law. The four core journals were Journal of Ethnopharmacology (n = 17), Food Chemistry (n = 7), Life Sciences (n = 5), and Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry (n = 4).
Table 2

Journals in which the 100 most-cited ethnopharmacology articles were published.

JournalPublication countCitation countCitation per articleTopic
Journal of Ethnopharmacology179,1985412
Food Chemistry73,8735531
Life Sciences53,0106022
Journal of Agricultural Food Chemistry45,9731,4931
Phytochemistry31,6125373
Phytotherapy Research31,4214742
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America31,3334446
Science21,9849926
African Journal of Biotechnology21,1895957
Current Medicinal Chemistry21,1835923
Diabetes Care21,0675345
Current Science29344676
Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz27273644
Journal of the American Medical Association15,2535
Journal of Applied Microbiology11,2327
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology11,1627
Phytochemical Analysis18793
Journal of Association of Physicians of India18195
Journal of Natural Products17973
Angewandte Chemie International Edition17703
Drug Discovery Today17363
Environmental Health Perspectives17204
Bulletin of the World Health Organization17055
Toxicon16894
Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology16694
Molecular Aspects of Medicine16514
Brazilian Journal of Microbiology15917
Pharmacognosy Reviews15862
European Journal of Cancer15664
Critical Reviews in Immunology15414
PLoS ONE15306
Nature15196
Mutation Research—Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis15074
Food and Chemical Toxicology15004
Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine14912
Phytomedicine14782
American Journal of Medicine14585
Trends in Biotechnology14567
Plant Science14468
Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine14432
Bioresource Technology14427
Microbes and Infection14427
Annals of Internal Medicine14295
Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research14295
In Vivo14235
Alternative Medicine Review14085
Experientia13985
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry13973
Molecular Pharmacology13915
BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine13902
FASEB Journal13885
Carcinogenesis13815
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences13766
Free Radical Biology and Medicine13735
Journal of Applied Phycology13678
Social Science and Medicine13679
International Immunopharmacology13604
Mini-Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry13543
AAPS Journal13535

The topics of the journals were coded as 1, food research (chemistry etc.)(number of articles, n = 11); 2, ethnopharmacology and medicinal plant research (n = 28); 3, phytochemistry with a link to traditional uses (n = 11); 4, pharmacology and pharmacy (n = 10); 5, clinical (n = 20); 6, multidisciplinary journals (n = 10); 7, microbiology and biotechnology (n = 7); 8, plant science (n = 2); and 9, social sciences (n = 1).

Journals in which the 100 most-cited ethnopharmacology articles were published. The topics of the journals were coded as 1, food research (chemistry etc.)(number of articles, n = 11); 2, ethnopharmacology and medicinal plant research (n = 28); 3, phytochemistry with a link to traditional uses (n = 11); 4, pharmacology and pharmacy (n = 10); 5, clinical (n = 20); 6, multidisciplinary journals (n = 10); 7, microbiology and biotechnology (n = 7); 8, plant science (n = 2); and 9, social sciences (n = 1).

What key research themes were relevant (as indicated by citations) in ethnopharmacology?

There were 76 terms or phrases that appeared in five or more of the 100 articles (Figure 1). Figure 1 clearly suggested that terms or phrases related to anti-oxidant effects received much more citations per article than the average, as reflected by the red-orange-yellow-green bubbles concentrated on the lower right corner of the term map. For instance, “total phenolic content” appeared in seven articles with an average of 1,175 citations each. “Gallic acid equivalent” appeared in five articles with an average of 1,126 citations each. “Antioxidant activity” appeared in 18 articles with an average of 797 citations each. “DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl)” appeared in six articles with an average of 600 citations each. Free radical scavenging activity appeared in five articles with an average of 592 citations each. Meanwhile, seven articles had the phrase “herbal medicine” with an average of 1,148 citations each. Certain terms may reflect the geographical content of the ethnopharmacology articles, such as “traditional Chinese medicine” (n = 6) relates to China and “Ayurveda” (n = 6) relates to India. The 20 terms that appeared most in the titles and abstracts of the 100 articles are listed in Table 3.
Figure 1

Term map using words from titles and abstracts of the 100 most-cited ethnopharmacology articles. Words from titles and abstracts were parsed, analyzed and visualized by VOSviewer. There were 76 terms that appeared in five or more articles and hence included in the term map. Each bubble represents a term or phrase. The bubble size indicates its frequency of occurrence. The bubble color indicates the averaged citation counts received by articles containing the term or phrase. A line connects two bubbles if they co-occurred in any of the 100 articles. If two terms co-occurred more frequently, the two bubbles would be in closer proximity. Irrelevant terms were removed manually upon visual inspection of the initial map generated. Lower right corner contains numerous terms and phrases related to anti-oxidant activity and articles containing them had more citations than the average, as indicated by the red, orange, yellow, and green bubbles.

Table 3

The 20 terms that appeared most in the titles and abstracts of the 100 articles.

TermsAppearanceCitations per article
Compound35604
Medicinal plant32640
Biological activity31547
Use31679
Extract29658
Source26663
Property22567
System22588
Number21573
Medicine20522
Species20640
Traditional medicine19520
Antioxidant activity17797
Constituent18558
Disease18482
Drug18622
Treatment17596
Component16588
Mechanism15566
Antimicrobial activity13596
Term map using words from titles and abstracts of the 100 most-cited ethnopharmacology articles. Words from titles and abstracts were parsed, analyzed and visualized by VOSviewer. There were 76 terms that appeared in five or more articles and hence included in the term map. Each bubble represents a term or phrase. The bubble size indicates its frequency of occurrence. The bubble color indicates the averaged citation counts received by articles containing the term or phrase. A line connects two bubbles if they co-occurred in any of the 100 articles. If two terms co-occurred more frequently, the two bubbles would be in closer proximity. Irrelevant terms were removed manually upon visual inspection of the initial map generated. Lower right corner contains numerous terms and phrases related to anti-oxidant activity and articles containing them had more citations than the average, as indicated by the red, orange, yellow, and green bubbles. The 20 terms that appeared most in the titles and abstracts of the 100 articles. Studies with a focus on antioxidant effects, and works focusing on fruits and other food-related species and their related concepts were often highly cited. This may be linked to the fact that antioxidant tests are usually affordable and easily available (Kedare and Singh, 2011) so the majority of the labs, regardless of their budget size, could readily use them. It also reflects the size of research fields—the food sciences field is much larger than research into medicinal plants (as well as the associated industries). The food sitting close to traditional medicine makes an interesting link to the “Let food be thy medicine and medicine be thy food” concept advocated by Hippocrates. Functional foods have an enormous global market that has recently grown from US$33 billion (Menrad, 2003) to US$168 billion (Vicentini et al., 2016). A substantive body of research on functional food research advocates the intake of antioxidant nutrients for better well-being and health (Diplock et al., 1998). Food plants are also easily and often commercially available through the world. In other words, resource availability may be the key concept to interpret the focus for antioxidants and food plants in general. Spices are an important topic in these studies, particularly the curcumin from turmeric (Curcuma longa L.), which was mentioned in eight of the 100 articles, including in the titles of six of the 100 articles. This is not unexpected, since many spices are heavily used in the traditional medicine (Vimala et al., 1999; Aggarwal et al., 2007; Singh, 2007). While this demonstrates the importance of the topic in bibliometric terms, readers should be aware that antioxidant tests are often based on simple chemical reactions that may not translate well to demonstrate effects in real biological systems. Currently, they are not accepted as a relevant aspect of pharmacological research (see e.g., the “Rules of Five” of the Journal of Ethnopharmacology). The 100 articles involved clinical or pre-clinical research on numerous diseases. Diseases often mentioned in the 100 articles included diabetes (n = 7; 565 citations each) and cancer (n = 12; 473 citations each). The citations of these papers are mainly from the year 2004 onwards. For instance, there is a comprehensive report that reviewed the effects of various medicinal plants originating from Asia, Europe, the Middle East, and the Americas on diabetes (Bailey and Day, 1989). Similarly, there was a report on plant-derived compounds as anti-cancer agents (Cragg and Newman, 2005). Other diseases that were mentioned in at least three of the 100 articles included Alzheimer's disease (n = 3; 564 citations each), arthritis (n = 4; 478 citations each), and rheumatism (n = 3; 449 citations each). In addition, six papers mentioned gastrointestinal disease (three of them were in the abstracts while the other three were in keywords). One paper mentioned respiratory disease. Since these terms appeared in fewer than five of the 100 articles' titles or abstracts, they were not visualized in Figure 1. No paper mentioned gynecology or dermatology. Some studies show some links into traditional medicine/ethnopharmacology, but are in essence a clinical study, for example (Kronenberg and Fugh-Berman, 2002). Some important metabolites and related concepts have been mentioned at least thrice in the 100 articles, including alkaloids (n = 5; on average 534 citations), essential oil (n = 4; 774), flavonoids (n = 11; 621), and tannin (n = 5; 752). These topics have constituted a large portion of the existing ethnopharmacology literature. The link of the 100 ethnopharmacological papers into the context of drug discovery seemed to be marginal. Seven of the 100 papers discussed the concept of drug discovery in their titles, abstracts, or keywords. Six of the seven papers reviewed the drug discovery from Allium (garlic and onion), seaweed, medicinal plants, and natural products in general (Block, 1992; Fabricant and Farnsworth, 2001; Smit, 2004; Balunas and Kinghorn, 2005; Gurib-Fakim, 2006; Harvey, 2008). Klayman (1985) analyzed the development of artemisinin from the Chinese medicinal plant Artemisia annua L. The remaining paper demonstrated a possible major active metabolite responsible for the antidepressant effect of the extract from St. John's wort (Chatterjee et al., 1998), which happens to be the only paper dealing with St. John's wort, one of the best studied medicinal plants. Together with a paper dealing with opioid K inhibition and salvinorin (Roth et al., 2002), these two are the only ones dealing with neuropharmacology among the 100. Another interesting gap is research on Cannabis and its active metabolites tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabis (CBD). Here a large number of papers have been published, but clearly not deemed to be linked to ethnopharmacology, for example (Bisogno et al., 2001). Sustainability, access, and benefit sharing are also clearly are not major topics (as evident from Figure 1, the only term with relevance in this context seems to be “availability”). The latest papers in our top 100 list were published in 2010. Our Scopus search has identified that only two post-2010 papers had at least 300 citations, and both of them have exceeded the citation count of the last paper on our top 100 list. However, they were excluded as one focused on genomics and drug synthesis (Cragg and Newman, 2013) (582 citations) whereas the other one strictly dealt with chemistry (Kumar and Pandey, 2013; 399 citations). The citation counts of the articles have no significant correlation with the number of years since publication (r = 0.134, p = 0.184). Since the articles were generally published well before 2010, an analysis of open vs. closed access is problematic and was not conducted. Eight articles became available under an open access (OA) model at the time of publication, but today 66 more articles are available freely through different schemes. There seems to be no major difference in the number of OA articles among the highly cited and the less cited (Top 100: 8 OA articles, Rank 1000–1100: 9 OA articles, Rank 1900–2000: 5 OA articles). This is in line with the findings from life science research that open access might be associated with more full text downloads without an actual citation advantage (Davis et al., 2008).

What can we learn from the highly cited papers in this field in the context of ethnopharmacology's wider and changing relevance within the natural sciences?

The 100 articles were binarized into pre-2000 (the year 2000 inclusive) and post-2000 publications and assessed. There were 32 pre-2000 and 68 post-2000 publications. The topics of pre-2000 publications appeared to be more focused, with only several specific plants or food appearing in multiple (i.e., two or more) articles, namely garlic, onion, propolis, rosemary, sage and Withania somnifera (L.) Dunal. Each appeared in two articles published pre-2000. The foci of post-2000 publications, on the other hand, seemed to be more diversified and involved more plants or food, namely aloe vera, cinnamon, clove, Coccinia grandis (L.) Voigt, C. longa L., Eucalyptus, ginger, Gymnema sylvestre (Retz.) R.Br. ex Sm., Momordica charantia L., mushroom, origanum, pomegranate, sage (Salvia officinalis L.), thyme and yeast. Except for C. longa, M. charantia and yeast that have had three appearances each, the other species and foods have appeared twice in the post-2000 publications. The post-2000 publications have shifted foci compared to their pre-2000 counterparts, with the evidence that sage is the only plant that has appeared multiple times both in pre-2000 and post-2000 publications. Another noticeable point is that post-2000 publications had evaluated wider aspects of effects of the medicinal plants and functional food. For instance, post-2000 publications focus more on antibacterial, anticancer, anticandidal, antifungal, antimicrobial, antioxidant, and antitumor activities, while pre-2000 publications only referred to antibacterial, antimicrobial, and antioxidant activities.

Who and what has driven the research?

The 100 most-cited articles were contributed by a total of 159 authors. Only one author, Bharat Bhushan Aggarwal, has contributed to four publications making him the only one to contribute three or more of the 100 most-cited articles. He authored four of them. All of them were published post-2000. No author has multiple contributions to the pre-2000 articles. The 100 articles were contributed by 160 affiliations. Those with three or more articles were University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center (n = 5), The University of Hong Kong (n = 3), and University of Illinois at Chicago (n = 3). All but one of these 11 articles were published post-2000. No affiliation has multiple contributions to the pre-2000 articles. The 100 articles originated from 40 countries/territories, with the top contributions being by The United States (n = 29) and India (n = 13) (Table 4). Also noticeable countries/territories were China (n = 8), the United Kingdom (n = 8), Brazil (n = 5), and Germany (n = 5). In summary, the 100 articles had major contributions, not mutually exclusive, from countries/territories from Europe (n = 41), Asia (n = 39), and North America (n = 32), and some contributions from South America (n = 6), Africa (n = 6), and Oceania (n = 2). Comparing the articles published pre- and post-2000, The United States, India, and United Kingdom were listed among the top 5 contributors in both periods. However, China and Iran have a much larger contribution in the post-2000 publications (China: n = 7, Iran: n = 4) compared to the pre-2000 publications (China: n = 1, Iran: n = 0), and they have consequently replaced Brazil and Germany as members of the top five contributors.
Table 4

Countries/territories contributed to the 100 most cited ethnopharmacology articles.

Country/territoryNumber of articles
United States29
India13
China8
United Kingdom8
Brazil5
Germany5
Hong Kong SAR (China)4
Iran4
Israel4
Netherlands3
South Africa3
Spain3
Turkey3
Belgium2
Canada2
Japan2
Poland2
Singapore2
South Korea2
Ukraine2

Countries/territories that each contributed to one article included Algeria, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Bulgaria, Croatia, Denmark, Finland, France, Italy, Lithuania, Mauritius, Mexico, New Zealand, Nigeria, Oman, Pakistan, Switzerland, Taiwan, and United Arab Emirates.

Countries/territories contributed to the 100 most cited ethnopharmacology articles. Countries/territories that each contributed to one article included Algeria, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Bulgaria, Croatia, Denmark, Finland, France, Italy, Lithuania, Mauritius, Mexico, New Zealand, Nigeria, Oman, Pakistan, Switzerland, Taiwan, and United Arab Emirates. Geography and culture have been an integral part of ethnopharmacology. Interestingly, only one of the 100 articles related to the social sciences aspects, which examined the use of medicinal plants in four indigenous groups of Mexican Indians (Heinrich et al., 1998). Perhaps in the future, more attention should be directed toward the cultural aspects of ethnopharmacology.

Limitations

The list of top 100 most cited articles, by its nature, has inherent limitations. The first and foremost limitation is the search strategy. An article would not be identified if its title, abstract, and keywords did not contain the pre-defined search terms. The second limitation is the definition of ethnopharmacology. For instance, one paper (Chatterjee et al., 1998) reported on the efficacy of the extract from a licensed European medicinal plant (St. John's wort) as antidepressant, and it surely deals with neuropharmacology, but it may or may not constitute ethnopharmacology sensu stricto. Meanwhile, papers would be excluded from the current study if they were classed strictly as drug discovery or the title, abstracts or keywords assigned by EMTREE or MeSH did not contain the pre-defined key words related to ethnopharmacology. For example, some very widely used reviews on drug discovery from natural sources are not coded in such a way that they are included in this list: (Newman et al., 2003; Newman and Cragg, 2007) (These papers have 1,860 and 2,594 citations recorded by Scopus, respectively). This suggests a need for a top-level keyword (such as ethnopharmacology or traditional medicine) to be used widely. Ethnopharmacology or, more generally, the information which forms the basis of research and development activities, is still not well-recognized as an important element of the industrial development pipeline. This contradicts the common perception that ethnopharmacology is seen as an important source for new medicines. In essence, this also reflects the classical separation of the natural sciences into defined disciplines like chemistry and pharmacology, with ethnopharmacology being more strongly linked to pharmacology (and food science). Lastly, this work is based on a retrospective analysis and highlights research interests of the last decade or the last two decades and will be changing citation preferences in the future. It can be argued that the field may be shifting away from antioxidants and food science as some journals are now rejecting manuscripts based solely on in silico or simple antioxidant assays of food (Harnly, 2017). This also includes Frontiers in Pharmacology (section Ethnopharmacology) and the Journal of Ethnopharmacology. However, this latest shift has yet to be reflected in terms of citations.

What can we learn from this for the future development of the field?

The research into bioactive natural products from medicinal plants has a long tradition, with many groups in the nineteenth century starting to search for the active principles in medicinal products and with an interest in the species pharmacology (Heinrich and Jäger, 2015). With the booming literature in neuroscience and nutritional neuroscience (Yeung et al., 2017b), it would not be surprising to see stronger links of ethnopharmacology to neuroscience, neuropharmacology and food science in the near future. This would also bring ethnopharmacology back to its “roots,” since the early developments were driven by scientific interests in psychoactive plants (Heinrich, 2013). For instance, future research may shed light on how ingredients from medicinal plants would modulate, or even treat, eating or neuropsychiatric disorders. Such effects may be manifested as brain perfusion changes recorded by functional magnetic resonance imaging (Yeung et al., 2016, 2018). Metabolic syndrome and diabetes will continue to be a key area of interest and will strengthen the links into preventive medicine and food sciences. In future, this field should move away further from papers focused solely on in silico or on simple antioxidant screening reports to papers introducing new methods applicable to ethnopharmacology, which is largely missing from the current top 100 list.

Conclusions

We have identified the 100 most-cited articles in ethnopharmacology. This analysis identifies what has been seen to be of such importance in scientific terms that it is commonly used in citations. Some surprising outcomes include the important link to food sciences, and the relevance of some biological assays, which, in reality, are not considered to be of pharmacological relevance. Some other areas are notably absent including stronger links into neuropharmacology and a lack appreciation of social and cultural sciences approaches. The analysis demonstrated that ethnopharmacology is at the crossroads of several disciplines (most notably pharmacology and food science) and it is the ethnopharmacologists' challenge and opportunity to define this area in new ways, including the development of new links and foci (cf. Nina Etkin's work, e.g., Etkin and Ross, 1991). In a book published in 2015 a large number of contributors provided a short definition of what they consider ethnopharmacology to be Heinrich and Jäger (2015). The diversity of their responses with foci on pharmacology, clinical research, cultural sciences and studies, biological sciences and environmental research are reflected in the diversity seen in this bibliometric analysis. This diversity clearly is one of the key strengths, but also a challenge of ethnopharmacology, which sees itself to be inter- or trans-disciplinary.

Author contributions

AY, MH, and AA: conceived the work; AY: acquired data and drafted the work; AY, MH, and AA: analyzed data; MH and AA: critically revised the work. All authors have approved the final content of the manuscript.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
  40 in total

Review 1.  Natural products as sources of new drugs over the period 1981-2002.

Authors:  David J Newman; Gordon M Cragg; Kenneth M Snader
Journal:  J Nat Prod       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.050

2.  Trends in ethnopharmocology.

Authors:  Anwarul Hassan Gilani; Attar-ur Rahman
Journal:  J Ethnopharmacol       Date:  2005-08-22       Impact factor: 4.360

3.  From exotic spice to modern drug?

Authors:  Seema Singh
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2007-09-07       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Ethnobotanical approaches of traditional medicine studies: some experiences from Asia.

Authors:  P Sheng-Ji
Journal:  Pharm Biol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.503

Review 5.  Best practice in research: Consensus Statement on Ethnopharmacological Field Studies - ConSEFS.

Authors:  Michael Heinrich; Andreas Lardos; Marco Leonti; Caroline Weckerle; Merlin Willcox; Wendy Applequist; Ana Ladio; Chun Lin Long; Pulok Mukherjee; Gary Stafford
Journal:  J Ethnopharmacol       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 4.360

Review 6.  Traditional plant medicines as treatments for diabetes.

Authors:  C J Bailey; C Day
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 19.112

7.  Hyperforin as a possible antidepressant component of hypericum extracts.

Authors:  S S Chatterjee; S K Bhattacharya; M Wonnemann; A Singer; W E Müller
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 5.037

8.  Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990-1997: results of a follow-up national survey.

Authors:  D M Eisenberg; R B Davis; S L Ettner; S Appel; S Wilkey; M Van Rompay; R C Kessler
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-11-11       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 9.  Natural products: a continuing source of novel drug leads.

Authors:  Gordon M Cragg; David J Newman
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2013-02-18

Review 10.  Qinghaosu (artemisinin): an antimalarial drug from China.

Authors:  D L Klayman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1985-05-31       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  A literature analysis on anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy (anti-VEGF) using a bibliometric approach.

Authors:  Andy Wai Kan Yeung; Mohamed M Abdel-Daim; Abdelrahman Ibrahim Abushouk; Kazuaki Kadonosono
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2019-03-02       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 2.  Addressing artifacts of colorimetric anticancer assays for plant-based drug development.

Authors:  Salma Batool; Seejal Javaid; Hira Javed; Izzah Shahid; Mishal Khan; Amna Muhammad
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 3.738

3.  Bibliometric Analysis of Global Research Trends on Ultrasound Microbubble: A Quickly Developing Field.

Authors:  Haiyang Wu; Linjian Tong; Yulin Wang; Hua Yan; Zhiming Sun
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 5.810

4.  When Neuroscience Meets Pharmacology: A Neuropharmacology Literature Analysis.

Authors:  Andy Wai Kan Yeung; Nikolay T Tzvetkov; Atanas G Atanasov
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Readability of the 100 Most-Cited Neuroimaging Papers Assessed by Common Readability Formulae.

Authors:  Andy W K Yeung; Tazuko K Goto; W Keung Leung
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  The 100 Most Cited Papers Concerning the Insular Cortex of the Brain: A Bibliometric Analysis.

Authors:  Andy W K Yeung
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 7.  Antioxidants: Scientific Literature Landscape Analysis.

Authors:  Andy Wai Kan Yeung; Nikolay T Tzvetkov; Osama S El-Tawil; Simona G Bungǎu; Mohamed M Abdel-Daim; Atanas G Atanasov
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 6.543

Review 8.  Bibliometric Profile and Density Visualizing Analysis of Yoga Intervention in Type 2 Diabetes: A 44 - Year Study on Global Scientific Research Output from 1975 to 2019.

Authors:  Ramya Ramamoorthi; Daniel Gahreman; Timothy Skinner; Simon Moss
Journal:  Int J Yoga       Date:  2021-05-10

9.  Implications of Twitter in Health-Related Research: A Landscape Analysis of the Scientific Literature.

Authors:  Andy Wai Kan Yeung; Maria Kletecka-Pulker; Fabian Eibensteiner; Petra Plunger; Sabine Völkl-Kernstock; Harald Willschke; Atanas G Atanasov
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-07-09

10.  Insight into the characteristics of research published in traditional, complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine journals: a bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  Jeremy Y Ng
Journal:  BMC Complement Med Ther       Date:  2021-07-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.