Literature DB >> 29599377

Clinicopathological Analysis of Ultrasound-guided Vacuum-assisted Breast Biopsy for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Breast Disease.

Hai-Lin Park1, Ka Young Kim2, Jong Seob Park3, Ji-Eun Shin2, Hye-Rin Kim2, Bora Yang2, Ji-Young Kim4, Jeong Yun Shim4, Eun-Ah Shin4, Song-Mi Noh4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: To evaluate the usefulness and safety of vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VABB) for breast lesion diagnosis and treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Clinical and histopathological data of 8,748 patients, who underwent 11,221 VABB procedures were analyzed.
RESULTS: Most patients (58.2%) were <40 years old. Most lesions (39.6%) were 0.6-1.0 cm in diameter while 3.2% were ≥3.0 cm; fibroadenomas were the most common (46.6%). Eight (14% of 57) cases of atypical ductal hyperplasia were underestimated. The positive predictive values (PPVs) of breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) ultrasound category were 0.6%, 3.4%, 34.8%, 66.2%, and 93.8% for category 3, 4a, 4b, 4c, and 5 lesions, respectively. The mean number of core specimens was 9.5±8.8; the mean procedure time was 3.4±2.7 min. No residual lesions were found in 94.4% of the 7,480 patients.
CONCLUSION: VABB could replace ultrasound-guided core biopsy and surgical excisional biopsy for the diagnosis of breast disease and the treatment of benign breast lesions. Copyright
© 2018, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast disease; mammotome excision; ultrasound; underestimation; vacuum assisted breast biopsy

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29599377     DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.12499

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anticancer Res        ISSN: 0250-7005            Impact factor:   2.480


  8 in total

1.  Feasibility and safety of image-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis of 20 000 population from 36 longitudinal studies.

Authors:  Ming Fang; Guilin Liu; Guoliang Luo; Tianyu Wu
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Endoscope-Assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery for the Treatment of Glandular Gynecomastia.

Authors:  Congcong Liu; Ying Tong; Feixiang Sun; Chuanpeng Zhang; Ziyi Yu; Pan Yu; Hong Pan; Wenbin Zhou; Jingping Shi; Yi Zhao
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 2.326

3.  Patient reported cosmetic outcome after vacuum assisted excision of benign breast lesions: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Elles M F van de Voort; Taco M A L Klem; Gerson M Struik; Erwin Birnie; Renata H J A Sinke; Ali Ghandi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  The influence of preoperative biopsy on the surgical method in breast cancer patients: a single-center experience of 3,966 cases in China.

Authors:  Rongyue Teng; Qun Wei; Jichun Zhou; Mingjun Dong; Lidan Jin; Wenxian Hu; Jida Chen; Linbo Wang; Wenhe Zhao
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-03

5.  Vacuum-Assisted Excision, Scarless Solution for Fibroadenoma Breast-A Single-Center Experience.

Authors:  R Rupa; Suchana Kushvaha
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2021-11-01

6.  Ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in the diagnosis of cancer recurrence at the surgical scar: a report of three cases.

Authors:  Laila Abu Tahoun; Bayan Maraqa
Journal:  J Ultrason       Date:  2022-02-08

7.  Breast lesions excised via vacuum-assisted system: could we get any clues for B3 lesions before excision biopsy?

Authors:  Liang Zheng; Fufu Zheng; Zhaomin Xing; Yunjian Zhang; Yongxin Li; Hongbiao Xu; Yuanhui Lai; Jie Li; Wenjian Wang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Reconsidering the therapeutic use for vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in breast cancer patients: a retrospective single-center study.

Authors:  Jialin Zhao; Xuejing Wang; Ying Xu; Li Peng; Qiang Sun
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 1.241

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.