Literature DB >> 29598886

Mapping existing hip and knee replacement registries in Europe.

A Lübbeke1, A J Silman2, C Barea3, D Prieto-Alhambra2, A J Carr2.   

Abstract

The general shortage of evidence regarding benefits and harms of medical devices has been highlighted following the serious safety concerns with metal-on-metal hip replacements and silicone breast implants and was again pointed out in a recent survey of European Health Technology Assessment institutions. In this context the new European medical device regulation will enforce post-marketing surveillance of existing and new implants. The usefulness of registry data as a source of information for medical device real-world clinical performance and safety has been demonstrated. However, these data might be under-used by researchers and policy makers. One reason for this is the insufficient awareness of their existence. The aim of this review is to provide information to relevant stakeholders on the extent and breadth of the data currently collected in European joint replacement registries. We identified 24 registries, most of them of national coverage. Total numbers of primary total hip and knee replacements included were over 3.1 and 2.5 million records, respectively. The current focus of these registries is on whole-lifespan implant surveillance via revision rate monitoring, quality assessment of surgical and perioperative care, and hospital performance assessment. More recently, national and international comparison and benchmarking have increasingly become part of their endeavors.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroplasty registry; European registries; Health technology assessment; Hip arthroplasty; Knee arthroplasty; Medical devices; Post-marketing surveillance

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29598886     DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.03.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy        ISSN: 0168-8510            Impact factor:   2.980


  21 in total

1.  CORR Insights®: What Are the Migration Patterns for U.S. Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty Patients?

Authors:  Don C Beringer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Medical Devices: Definition, Classification, and Regulatory Implications.

Authors:  Jeffrey K Aronson; Carl Heneghan; Robin E Ferner
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  Limping and patient satisfaction after primary total hip arthroplasty: a registry-based cohort study.

Authors:  Alice Bonnefoy-Mazure; Antoine Poncet; Amanda Gonzalez; Christophe Barea; Didier Hannouche; Anne Lübbeke
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 3.925

Review 4.  The First Report of the International Cartilage Regeneration and Joint Preservation Society's Global Registry.

Authors:  Leela C Biant; Caitlin W Conley; Michael J McNicholas
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Changing Device Regulations in the European Union: Impact on Research, Innovation and Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Ksenija Vasiljeva; Bernard H van Duren; Hemant Pandit
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 1.251

6.  International variation in distribution of ASA class in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty and its influence on mortality: data from an international consortium of arthroplasty registries.

Authors:  Alan J Silman; Christophe Combescure; Rory J Ferguson; Stephen E Graves; Elizabeth W Paxton; Chris Frampton; Ove Furnes; Anne Marie Fenstad; Gary Hooper; Anne Garland; Anneke Spekenbrink-Spooren; J Mark Wilkinson; Keijo Mäkelä; Anne Lübbeke; Ola Rolfson
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.717

7.  Feasibility of identifying important changes in care management resulting from cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) using hospital episode data in patients who activate the primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) pathway.

Authors:  Maria Pufulete; Jessica Harris; Stephen Dorman; Lynn Cook; Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci; John P Greenwood; Richard Anderson; Rachel Brierley; Barnaby C Reeves
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 4.615

8.  Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after elective hip, knee and shoulder arthroplasty: protocol for a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Alberto Grassi; Davide Golinelli; Dario Tedesco; Maurizia Rolli; Barbara Bordini; Marilina Amabile; Paola Rucci; Maria Pia Fantini; Stefano Zaffagnini
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  ASA class is associated with early revision and reoperation after total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of the Geneva and Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Registries.

Authors:  Rory J Ferguson; Alan J Silman; Christophe Combescure; Erik Bulow; Daniel Odin; Didier Hannouche; Siôn Glyn-Jones; Ola Rolfson; Anne Lübbeke
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  The influence of the infusion of ephedrine and phenylephrine on the hemodynamic stability after subarachnoid anesthesia in senior adults - a controlled randomized trial.

Authors:  Miodrag Žunić; Nevenka Krčevski Škvarč; Mirt Kamenik
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 2.217

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.