Literature DB >> 29596857

Inversion effects for faces and objects in developmental prosopagnosia: A case series analysis.

Solja K Klargaard1, Randi Starrfelt2, Christian Gerlach3.   

Abstract

The disproportionate face inversion effect (dFIE) concerns the finding that face recognition is more affected by inversion than recognition of non-face objects; an effect assumed to reflect that face recognition relies on special operations. Support for this notion comes from studies showing that face processing in developmental prosopagnosia (DP) is less affected by inversion than it is in normal subjects, and that DPs may even display face inversion superiority effects, i.e. better processing of inverted compared to upright faces. To date, however, there are no reports of direct comparisons between inversion effects for faces and objects, investigating whether the altered inversion effect in DP is specific to faces. We examined this question by comparing inversion effects for faces and cars in two otherwise identical recognition tasks in a group of DPs (N = 16) and a matched control group, using a case series design. Although both groups showed inversion effects for both faces and cars, only the control group exhibited a significant dFIE, i.e. a larger inversion effect for faces than cars. In comparison, the DPs were not significantly more affected by inversion than the control group when assessed with a face processing task that did not require recognition. Importantly, in both settings the DPs are better with upright than with inverted faces, and on the individual level no DP was found to perform significantly better with inverted than with upright faces. In fact, the DPs are impaired relative to the control group with both upright and inverted faces and to a less extent also with upright and inverted cars. These results yield no evidence of inversion superiority in DP but rather suggest that their face recognition problem is not limited to operations specialized for upright faces.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Developmental prosopagnosia; Face inversion effect; Face recognition; Holistic face processing

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29596857     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.03.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  6 in total

1.  Investigating the Influence of Autism Spectrum Traits on Face Processing Mechanisms in Developmental Prosopagnosia.

Authors:  Regan Fry; Xian Li; Travis C Evans; Michael Esterman; James Tanaka; Joseph DeGutis
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2022-09-29

2.  Contrasting domain-general and domain-specific accounts in cognitive neuropsychology: An outline of a new approach with developmental prosopagnosia as a case.

Authors:  Christian Gerlach; Jason J S Barton; Andrea Albonico; Manuela Malaspina; Randi Starrfelt
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-02-01

3.  Face masks versus sunglasses: limited effects of time and individual differences in the ability to judge facial identity and social traits.

Authors:  Rachel J Bennetts; Poppy Johnson Humphrey; Paulina Zielinska; Sarah Bate
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2022-02-16

4.  Faces and words are both associated and dissociated as evidenced by visual problems in dyslexia.

Authors:  Alexandra Arnardottir; Eydis Thuridur Halldorsdottir; Heida Maria Sigurdardottir
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Face recognition improvements in adults and children with face recognition difficulties.

Authors:  Sarah Bate; Kirsten Dalrymple; Rachel J Bennetts
Journal:  Brain Commun       Date:  2022-03-22

6.  Multiple latent variables but functionally dependent output mappings underlying the recognition of own- and other-race faces for Chinese individuals: Evidence from state-trace analysis.

Authors:  Wei Liu; Yuxue Jia
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-07-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.