PURPOSE/ BACKGROUND: Personalized (N-of-1) trials are single-patient, crossover-design trials that may be useful for personalizing the selection of depression treatments. We conducted a systematic review of published N-of-1 trials for depression to determine the feasibility and suitability of this methodology for personalizing depression care. METHODS/PROCEDURES: Electronic databases were searched from database inception through October 2016. Studies were selected if they enrolled depressed patients, included a within-subject crossover design, and systematically assessed depressive symptoms during the N-of-1 trial. FINDINGS/ RESULTS: Five eligible studies reporting on 47 depressed patients (range, 1-18 patients) were identified. Two studies were conducted among adults with treatment-resistant depression, 1 study among depressed inpatients, and 2 studies among patients from special populations (geriatric nursing home, human immunodeficiency virus-associated encephalopathy). All studies evaluated the effects of pharmacologic treatments (methylphenidate, D-amphetamine, ketamine, and sulpiride). Three studies compared an off-label treatment with placebo, 1 study compared 2 off-label treatments, and 1 study compared escalating doses of an off-label treatment with placebo. All 4 studies with more than 1 participant demonstrated heterogeneous treatment effects. All studies produced data that could personalize treatment selection for individual patients. No studies reported on recruitment challenges, compliance with self-tracking, or satisfaction with participation. IMPLICATIONS/ CONCLUSIONS: The feasibility of N-of-1 trials for depression was demonstrated for a limited number of second-line pharmacologic treatments in treatment-resistant patients or in patients with comorbidities that would have excluded them from conventional randomized controlled trials. Additional research is needed to determine whether N-of-1 trials are suitable for improving the selection of depression treatments in clinical practice.
PURPOSE/ BACKGROUND: Personalized (N-of-1) trials are single-patient, crossover-design trials that may be useful for personalizing the selection of depression treatments. We conducted a systematic review of published N-of-1 trials for depression to determine the feasibility and suitability of this methodology for personalizing depression care. METHODS/PROCEDURES: Electronic databases were searched from database inception through October 2016. Studies were selected if they enrolled depressed patients, included a within-subject crossover design, and systematically assessed depressive symptoms during the N-of-1 trial. FINDINGS/ RESULTS: Five eligible studies reporting on 47 depressed patients (range, 1-18 patients) were identified. Two studies were conducted among adults with treatment-resistant depression, 1 study among depressed inpatients, and 2 studies among patients from special populations (geriatric nursing home, human immunodeficiency virus-associated encephalopathy). All studies evaluated the effects of pharmacologic treatments (methylphenidate, D-amphetamine, ketamine, and sulpiride). Three studies compared an off-label treatment with placebo, 1 study compared 2 off-label treatments, and 1 study compared escalating doses of an off-label treatment with placebo. All 4 studies with more than 1 participant demonstrated heterogeneous treatment effects. All studies produced data that could personalize treatment selection for individual patients. No studies reported on recruitment challenges, compliance with self-tracking, or satisfaction with participation. IMPLICATIONS/ CONCLUSIONS: The feasibility of N-of-1 trials for depression was demonstrated for a limited number of second-line pharmacologic treatments in treatment-resistant patients or in patients with comorbidities that would have excluded them from conventional randomized controlled trials. Additional research is needed to determine whether N-of-1 trials are suitable for improving the selection of depression treatments in clinical practice.
Authors: Ronald C Kessler; Patricia Berglund; Olga Demler; Robert Jin; Doreen Koretz; Kathleen R Merikangas; A John Rush; Ellen E Walters; Philip S Wang Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-06-18 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: A John Rush; Madhukar H Trivedi; Stephen R Wisniewski; Jonathan W Stewart; Andrew A Nierenberg; Michael E Thase; Louise Ritz; Melanie M Biggs; Diane Warden; James F Luther; Kathy Shores-Wilson; George Niederehe; Maurizio Fava Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-03-23 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Leonard H Epstein; Warren K Bickel; Susan M Czajkowski; Rocco A Paluch; Mariola Moeyaert; Karina W Davidson Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2021-08-09 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Karina W Davidson; Michael Silverstein; Ken Cheung; Rocco A Paluch; Leonard H Epstein Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2021-04-01 Impact factor: 16.193
Authors: Archana Mande; Susan L Moore; Farnoush Banaei-Kashani; Benjamin Echalier; Sheana Bull; Michael A Rosenberg Journal: JMIR Form Res Date: 2022-04-12
Authors: Lyndonna Marrast; Joseph Conigliaro; Camille Chan; Eun Ji Kim; Joan Duer-Hefele; Michael A Diefenbach; Karina W Davidson Journal: Per Med Date: 2021-05-28 Impact factor: 2.119
Authors: Ian M Kronish; Ying Kuen Cheung; Jacob Julian; Faith Parsons; Jenny Lee; Sunmoo Yoon; Heidis Valdimarsdottir; Paige Green; Jerry Suls; Dawn L Hershman; Karina W Davidson Journal: Healthcare (Basel) Date: 2019-12-30
Authors: Shannon M Smith; Maurizio Fava; Mark P Jensen; Omar B Mbowe; Michael P McDermott; Dennis C Turk; Robert H Dworkin Journal: Pain Date: 2020-09 Impact factor: 7.926