Literature DB >> 29596123

Fast-Track Recovery Program After Major Liver Resection: A Randomized Prospective Study.

Maria Kapritsou1, Dimitrios P Korkolis, Margarita Giannakopoulou, Ioannis Kaklamanos, Maria Konstantinou, Theodoros Katsoulas, Panagiotis Kiekkas, Evangelos A Konstantinou.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare fast-track (FT) recovery protocol with the conventional one in patients treated with major liver resection by evaluating perioperative morbidity, length of hospitalization, and readmission rate. Sixty-two patients suffering from malignant liver tumors were surgically treated from May 2012 to April 2014. After randomization, they were prospectively divided into two groups: Group A patients (n = 32) followed FT recovery protocol and Group B patients (n = 30) were treated with the conventional (CON) protocol. Postoperative morbidity, readmission rate, and median hospital stay in the two groups were studied. Fast-track protocol was associated with a decreased complication (25%, p = .002), whereas the risk of postoperative morbidity was 2.4 times higher in patients treated with the CON protocol (60%, p = .002). Readmission rate was not significantly different between the two groups (6.25%, p = .35). Age (p = .382) and body mass index (p = .818) were not a suspending factor for following the FT protocol. Overall length of stay (postoperative days) in the FT group was (mean ± SD) 5.75 ± .5 and in the CON group was 13.5 ± 6.7 (p < .001). Fast-track recovery protocol seems to be safe and particularly efficient in patients undergoing major liver resections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29596123     DOI: 10.1097/SGA.0000000000000306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterol Nurs        ISSN: 1042-895X            Impact factor:   0.978


  4 in total

Review 1.  Nurse-Led Randomized Controlled Trials in the Perioperative Setting: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Judy Munday; Niall Higgins; Saira Mathew; Lizanne Dalgleish; Anthony S Batterbury; Luke Burgess; Jill Campbell; Lori J Delaney; Bronwyn R Griffin; James A Hughes; Jessica Ingleman; Samantha Keogh; Fiona Coyer
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2020-07-21

Review 2.  ERAS in minimally invasive hepatectomy.

Authors:  Andrew K Y Fung; Charing C N Chong; Paul B S Lai
Journal:  Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2020-05-31

Review 3.  Current status of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in gastrointestinal surgery.

Authors:  Michał Pędziwiatr; Judene Mavrikis; Jan Witowski; Alexandros Adamos; Piotr Major; Michał Nowakowski; Andrzej Budzyński
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 3.064

4.  Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic hepatectomy: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Wenbin Jiang; Qijiang Mao; Yangyang Xie; Hanning Ying; Hongxia Xu; Huiqing Ge; Lijun Feng; Hui Liu; Jianhua Li; Xiao Liang
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 1.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.