Rod J Rohrich1,2, Bernardino M Mendez1,2, Paul N Afrooz1,2. 1. Dallas, Texas. 2. From the Dallas Plastic Surgery Institute and the Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Outpatient surgery offers many advantages, including cost-containment, privacy, and convenience. However, patient safety must take precedence over these benefits. Limited well-designed studies exist in the plastic surgery literature on patient safety in the outpatient setting, particularly those that identify risk factors for adverse outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on 26,032 consecutive cases completed by board-certified plastic surgeons at an accredited outpatient surgical center between 1995 and 2017. All cases were reviewed for potential morbidity and mortality events, and variables were analyzed to determine potential risk factors for postoperative complications and inpatient admission. RESULTS: A total of 26,032 cases were performed over a 23-year period. There were a total of 203 complications (0.78 percent). Compared with the control population, the 12 patients (0.05 percent) that sustained venous thromboembolic events demonstrated higher body mass indexes (p < 0.01), greater lipoaspirate amounts (p = 0.04), longer operative times (p < 0.01), and were more likely to have undergone a combined procedure (p < 0.01). In addition, the 22 patients (0.08 percent) that were transferred to inpatient facilities demonstrated greater body mass index (p < 0.01) and longer operative times (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Plastic surgery is safe to perform in an accredited outpatient facility for a majority of patients. According to the authors' data, postoperative monitoring in a nursing facility should be considered for the following high-risk patients: those with a body mass index greater than 30 kg/m, operative times greater than 4 hours, lipoaspirate volumes greater than 3 liters, and those undergoing combined procedures. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.
BACKGROUND:Outpatient surgery offers many advantages, including cost-containment, privacy, and convenience. However, patient safety must take precedence over these benefits. Limited well-designed studies exist in the plastic surgery literature on patient safety in the outpatient setting, particularly those that identify risk factors for adverse outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on 26,032 consecutive cases completed by board-certified plastic surgeons at an accredited outpatient surgical center between 1995 and 2017. All cases were reviewed for potential morbidity and mortality events, and variables were analyzed to determine potential risk factors for postoperative complications and inpatient admission. RESULTS: A total of 26,032 cases were performed over a 23-year period. There were a total of 203 complications (0.78 percent). Compared with the control population, the 12 patients (0.05 percent) that sustained venous thromboembolic events demonstrated higher body mass indexes (p < 0.01), greater lipoaspirate amounts (p = 0.04), longer operative times (p < 0.01), and were more likely to have undergone a combined procedure (p < 0.01). In addition, the 22 patients (0.08 percent) that were transferred to inpatient facilities demonstrated greater body mass index (p < 0.01) and longer operative times (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Plastic surgery is safe to perform in an accredited outpatient facility for a majority of patients. According to the authors' data, postoperative monitoring in a nursing facility should be considered for the following high-risk patients: those with a body mass index greater than 30 kg/m, operative times greater than 4 hours, lipoaspirate volumes greater than 3 liters, and those undergoing combined procedures. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.
Authors: Andrea Vittorio Emanuele Lisa; Valeriano Vinci; Leonardo Galtelli; Andrea Battistini; Matteo Murolo; Elena Vanni; Elena Azzolini; Marco Klinger Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Date: 2022-01-24