Literature DB >> 29595440

Measuring Patient Experiences: Is It Meaningful and Actionable?

Sabrina T Wong1, Sharon Johnston2, Fred Burge3, Kim McGrail4, William Hogg5.   

Abstract

Performance measurement must be meaningful to those being asked to contribute data and to the clinicians who are collecting the information. It must be actionable if performance measurement and reporting is to influence health system transformation. To date, measuring patient experiences in all parts of the healthcare system in Canada lags behind other countries. More attention needs to be paid to capturing patients with complex intersecting health and social problems that result from inequitable distribution of wealth and/or underlying structural inequities related to systemic issues such as racism and discrimination, colonialism and patriarchy. Efforts to better capture the experiences of patients who do not regularly access care and who speak English or French as a second language are also needed. Before investing heavily into collecting patient experience data as part of a performance measurement system the following ought to be considered: (1) ensuring value for and buy-in from clinicians who are being asked to collect the data and/or act on the results; (2) investment in the infrastructure to administer iterative, cost-effective patient/family experience data collection, analysis and reporting (e.g., automated software tools) and (3) incorporating practice support (e.g., facilitation) and health system opportunities to integrate the findings from patient experience surveys into policy and practice. Investment into the infrastructure of measuring, reporting and engaging clinicians in improving practice is needed for patient/caregiver experiences to be acted upon.
© 2017 Longwoods Publishing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29595440     DOI: 10.12927/hcpap.2017.25414

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Healthc Pap        ISSN: 1488-917X


  5 in total

1.  Confronting Barriers to Improving Healthcare Performance in Canada.

Authors:  Jason M Sutherland
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2021-11

2.  Consensus-Based Development of an Assessment Tool: A Methodology for Patient Engagement in Primary Care and CPD Research.

Authors:  Ethan Lin; Jeanne Gobraeil; Sharon Johnston; Maddie J Venables; Douglas Archibald
Journal:  J Contin Educ Health Prof       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 2.190

3.  Regional variation in primary care improvement strategies and policy: case studies that consider qualitative contextual data for performance measurement in three Canadian provinces.

Authors:  Ruth Martin-Misener; Sabrina T Wong; Sharon Johnston; Stephanie Blackman; Catherine Scott; William Hogg; Fred Burge; Anne M Grool; John L Campbell; Sara Wuite
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Priority measures for publicly reporting primary care performance: Results of public engagement through deliberative dialogues in 3 Canadian provinces.

Authors:  Morgan Slater; Julia Abelson; Sabrina T Wong; Julia M Langton; Fred Burge; William Hogg; Matthew Hogel; Ruth Martin-Misener; Sharon Johnston
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Balancing patient priorities for technical and interactional aspects of care in a measure of primary care quality.

Authors:  Carol Mulder; Nadiya Sunderji
Journal:  Prim Health Care Res Dev       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 1.458

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.