Literature DB >> 29595130

Verification bias.

Jack W O'Sullivan1, Amitava Banerjee2, Carl Heneghan3, Annette Pluddemann3.   

Abstract

This article is part of the Catalogue of Bias series. We present a description of verification bias, and outline its potential impact on research studies and the preventive steps to minimise its risk. We also present teaching slides in the online supplementary file. Verification bias (sometimes referred to as 'work-up bias') concerns the test(s) used to confirm a diagnosis within a diagnostic accuracy study. Verification bias occurs when only a proportion of the study participants receive confirmation of the diagnosis by the reference standard test, or if some participants receive a different reference standard test. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  diagnostic microbiology; diagnostic radiology; molecular diagnostics; prenatal diagnosis

Year:  2018        PMID: 29595130     DOI: 10.1136/bmjebm-2018-110919

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Evid Based Med        ISSN: 2515-446X


  5 in total

1.  Estimating Cancer Screening Sensitivity and Specificity Using Healthcare Utilization Data: Defining the Accuracy Assessment Interval.

Authors:  Jessica Chubak; Andrea N Burnett-Hartman; William E Barlow; Douglas A Corley; Jennifer M Croswell; Christine Neslund-Dudas; Anil Vachani; Michelle I Silver; Jasmin A Tiro; Aruna Kamineni
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 4.090

2.  Can high-risk CT features suggest local recurrence after stereotactic body radiation therapy for lung cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tae-Hyung Kim; Sungmin Woo; Darragh F Halpenny; Yeon Joo Kim; Soon Ho Yoon; Chong Hyun Suh
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 3.528

3.  Italian version of the short 10/66 dementia diagnostic schedule: a validation study.

Authors:  Aliaa Ibnidris; Giovanni Piumatti; Fabio Carlevaro; Marta Fadda; Francesca Magno; Daniele Magistro; Emiliano Albanese
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Adjusting for verification bias in diagnostic accuracy measures when comparing multiple screening tests - an application to the IP1-PROSTAGRAM study.

Authors:  Emily Day; David Eldred-Evans; A Toby Prevost; Hashim U Ahmed; Francesca Fiorentino
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  Evaluation of Diagnostic Strategies for Identifying SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Clinical Practice: a Systematic Review and Compliance with the Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies Guideline (STARD).

Authors:  Paula Cremades-Martínez; Lucy A Parker; Elisa Chilet-Rosell; Blanca Lumbreras
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2022-06-14
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.