Literature DB >> 29595057

Accurately Predicting Disordered Regions of Proteins Using Rosetta ResidueDisorder Application.

Stephanie S Kim1, Justin T Seffernick1, Steffen Lindert1.   

Abstract

Although many proteins necessitate well-folded structures to properly instigate their biological functions, a large fraction of functioning proteins contain regions-known as intrinsically disordered protein regions-where stable structures are not likely to form. Notable functional roles of intrinsically disordered proteins are in transcriptional regulation, translation, and cellular signal transduction. Moreover, intrinsically disordered protein regions are highly abundant in many proteins associated with various human diseases, therefore these segments have become attractive drug targets for potential therapeutics. Over the past decades, numerous computational methods have been developed to accurately predict disordered regions of proteins. Here we introduce a user-friendly and reliable approach for the prediction of disordered protein regions using the structure prediction software Rosetta. Using 245 proteins from a benchmark data set (16 DisProt database proteins) and a test data set (229 proteins with NMR data), we use Rosetta to predict the global protein structures and then show that there is a statistically significant difference between Rosetta scores in disordered and ordered regions, with scores being less favorable in disordered regions. Furthermore, the difference in scores between ordered and disordered protein regions is sufficient to accurately identify disordered protein regions. As a result, our Rosetta ResidueDisorder method (benchmark data set prediction accuracy of 71.77% and independent test data set prediction accuracy of 65.37%) outperformed other established disorder prediction tools and did not exhibit a biased prediction toward either ordered or disordered regions. To facilitate usage, a Rosetta application has been developed for the Rosetta ResidueDisorder method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29595057      PMCID: PMC5897131          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.8b01763

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem B        ISSN: 1520-5207            Impact factor:   2.991


  55 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Protein-protein docking with simultaneous optimization of rigid-body displacement and side-chain conformations.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Gray; Stewart Moughon; Chu Wang; Ora Schueler-Furman; Brian Kuhlman; Carol A Rohl; David Baker
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Contact order and ab initio protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Richard Bonneau; Ingo Ruczinski; Jerry Tsai; David Baker
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Toward high-resolution de novo structure prediction for small proteins.

Authors:  Philip Bradley; Kira M S Misura; David Baker
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-09-16       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Macromolecular modeling with rosetta.

Authors:  Rhiju Das; David Baker
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 23.643

Review 6.  Comprehensive review of methods for prediction of intrinsic disorder and its molecular functions.

Authors:  Fanchi Meng; Vladimir N Uversky; Lukasz Kurgan
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 9.261

7.  A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein.

Authors:  J Kyte; R F Doolittle
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1982-05-05       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 8.  Intrinsically disordered proteins in cellular signalling and regulation.

Authors:  Peter E Wright; H Jane Dyson
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 94.444

9.  Prediction of intrinsic disorder in proteins using MFDp2.

Authors:  Marcin J Mizianty; Vladimir Uversky; Lukasz Kurgan
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2014

10.  Benchmarking and analysis of protein docking performance in Rosetta v3.2.

Authors:  Sidhartha Chaudhury; Monica Berrondo; Brian D Weitzner; Pravin Muthu; Hannah Bergman; Jeffrey J Gray
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  7 in total

1.  A Unified De Novo Approach for Predicting the Structures of Ordered and Disordered Proteins.

Authors:  John J Ferrie; E James Petersson
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 2.991

2.  Measuring Intrinsic Disorder and Tracking Conformational Transitions Using Rosetta ResidueDisorder.

Authors:  Justin T Seffernick; He Ren; Stephanie S Kim; Steffen Lindert
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 2.991

3.  Predicting Protein Conformational Disorder and Disordered Binding Sites.

Authors:  Ketty C Tamburrini; Giulia Pesce; Juliet Nilsson; Frank Gondelaud; Andrey V Kajava; Jean-Guy Berrin; Sonia Longhi
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

Review 4.  Computational Structure Prediction for Antibody-Antigen Complexes From Hydrogen-Deuterium Exchange Mass Spectrometry: Challenges and Outlook.

Authors:  Minh H Tran; Clara T Schoeder; Kevin L Schey; Jens Meiler
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 8.786

5.  Predicting Protein Complex Structure from Surface-Induced Dissociation Mass Spectrometry Data.

Authors:  Justin T Seffernick; Sophie R Harvey; Vicki H Wysocki; Steffen Lindert
Journal:  ACS Cent Sci       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 14.553

6.  Predicting substitutions to modulate disorder and stability in coiled-coils.

Authors:  Yasaman Karami; Paul Saighi; Rémy Vanderhaegen; Denis Gerlier; Sonia Longhi; Elodie Laine; Alessandra Carbone
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Protein shape sampled by ion mobility mass spectrometry consistently improves protein structure prediction.

Authors:  S M Bargeen Alam Turzo; Justin T Seffernick; Amber D Rolland; Micah T Donor; Sten Heinze; James S Prell; Vicki H Wysocki; Steffen Lindert
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 17.694

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.