| Literature DB >> 29594921 |
Atsushi Isoda1, Kayoko Murayama2, Shigeki Ito3, Yoichi Kohara4, Masaki Iino5, Yuri Miyazawa6, Morio Matsumoto6, Hiroshi Handa7, Yosuke Imai8, Takuro Ishiguro8, Wataru Izumita9, Kiyoshi Kitano10, Yukio Hirabayashi10, Hideyuki Nakazawa11, Fumihiro Ishida12, Toru Mitsumori13, Keita Kirito13, Takaaki Chou8, Hirokazu Murakami14.
Abstract
In the era of novel therapeutic agents for multiple myeloma (MM), both the significance of achieving the plateau phase and the efficacy of subsequent maintenance therapy remain unclear. In the present study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of bortezomib maintenance therapy (biweekly for 1 year) in transplant-ineligible MM patients who plateaued after bortezomib-based induction therapy. Of 36 evaluable patients, the overall response rate during induction therapy was 61%, with a stringent complete response in 6%, a complete response in 6%, a very good partial response in 17%, and a partial response in 33%. Twenty patients achieved the plateau phase and subsequently received bortezomib maintenance therapy. Median progression-free survival from the induction and maintenance therapies was 13.8 months (95% confidence interval, 11.4-23.7 months) and 10.7 months (95% confidence interval, 3.7-10.7 months), respectively. During maintenance therapy, there were no cases with grade ≥ 2 peripheral neuropathy, nor was there any improvement in the quality of the response. In conclusion, although maintenance therapy with biweekly bortezomib for up to 1 year was feasible, plateau-oriented bortezomib induction therapy followed by bortezomib maintenance therapy was not adequate in newly diagnosed transplant-ineligible MM patients.Entities:
Keywords: Bortezomib; Maintenance; Multiple myeloma; Plateau phase; Transplant-ineligible
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29594921 DOI: 10.1007/s12185-018-2448-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Hematol ISSN: 0925-5710 Impact factor: 2.319