Literature DB >> 29594884

An eco-friendly method for heavy metal removal from mine tailings.

Fereshteh Arab1, Catherine N Mulligan2.   

Abstract

One of the serious environmental problems that society is facing today is mine tailings. These byproducts of the process of extraction of valuable elements from ores are a source of pollution and a threat to the environment. For example, mine tailings from past mining activities at Giant Mines, Yellowknife, are deposited in chambers, stopes, and tailing ponds close to the shores of The Great Slave Lake. One of the environmentally friendly approaches for removing heavy metals from these contaminated tailing is by using biosurfactants during the process of soil washing. The objective of this present study is to investigate the effect of sophorolipid (SL) concentration, the volume of washing solution per gram of medium, pH, and temperature on the efficiency of sophorolipids in removing heavy metals from mine tailings. It was found that the efficiency of the sophorolipids depends on its concentration, and is greatly affected by changes in pH, and temperature. The results of this experiment show that increasing the temperature from 15 to 23 °C, while using sophorolipids, resulted in an increase in the removal of iron, copper, and arsenic from the mine tailing specimen, from 0.25, 2.1, and 8.6 to 0.4, 3.3, and 11.7%. At the same time, increasing the temperature of deionized water (DIW) from 15 to 23 °C led to an increase in the removal of iron, copper, and arsenic from 0.03, 0.9, and 1.8 to 0.04, 1.1, and 2.1%, respectively. By increasing temperature from 23 to 35 °C, when using sophorolipids, 22% reduction in the removal of arsenic was observed. At the same time while using DI water as the washing solution, increasing temperature from 23 to 35 °C resulted in 6.2% increase in arsenic removal. The results from this present study indicate that sophorolipids are promising agents for replacing synthetic surfactants in the removal of arsenic and other heavy metals from soil and mine tailings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioremediation; Biosurfactants; Heavy metals; Metalloids; Mine tailing; Sophorolipids

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29594884     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018-1770-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  10 in total

1.  Geochemistry of the Archean Kam Group, Yellowknife Greenstone Belt, Slave Province, Canada.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Geol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.701

2.  pH-dependent surface charging and points of zero charge II. Update.

Authors:  Marek Kosmulski
Journal:  J Colloid Interface Sci       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 8.128

Review 3.  Environmental applications for biosurfactants.

Authors:  Catherine N Mulligan
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 8.071

Review 4.  Quantitative assessment of worldwide contamination of air, water and soils by trace metals.

Authors:  J O Nriagu; J M Pacyna
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1988-05-12       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Microbial production and application of sophorolipids.

Authors:  Inge N A Van Bogaert; Karen Saerens; Cassandra De Muynck; Dirk Develter; Wim Soetaert; Erick J Vandamme
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Sophorolipids-functionalized iron oxide nanoparticles.

Authors:  Niki Baccile; Romain Noiville; Lorenzo Stievano; Inge Van Bogaert
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 3.676

7.  Competitive and cooperative adsorption of arsenate and citrate on goethite.

Authors:  Rong Shi; Yongfeng Jia; Chengzhi Wang
Journal:  J Environ Sci (China)       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.565

8.  Sources and circulation of water and arsenic in the Giant Mine, Yellowknife, NWT, Canada.

Authors:  Ian D Clark; Kenneth G Raven
Journal:  Isotopes Environ Health Stud       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.675

9.  Comparison of arsenic(V) and arsenic(III) sorption onto iron oxide minerals: implications for arsenic mobility.

Authors:  Suvasis Dixit; Janet G Hering
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2003-09-15       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  Toxic metal(loid) speciation during weathering of iron sulfide mine tailings under semi-arid climate.

Authors:  Robert A Root; Sarah M Hayes; Corin M Hammond; Raina M Maier; Jon Chorover
Journal:  Appl Geochem       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 3.524

  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  Enhancement of phytoextraction by Taiwanese chenopod and Napier grass by soapnut saponin and EDDS additions.

Authors:  Chun-Han Ko; Bing-Yuan Yang; Fang-Chih Chang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  The Impact of Physical Properties on the Leaching of Potentially Toxic Elements from Antimony Ore Processing Wastes.

Authors:  Saijun Zhou; Andrew Hursthouse
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 3.  Sustainable Remediation of Contaminated Soil Using Biosurfactants.

Authors:  Catherine N Mulligan
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-03-15

4.  Developing a biosurfactant to attenuate arsenic contamination in mining tailings.

Authors:  Larissa S S Araújo; Silvana Q Silva; Mônica C Teixeira
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2021-02-07
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.