| Literature DB >> 29593970 |
Fan Fu1, Stefano Pisoni1, Thomas P Weiss1, Thomas Feurer1, Aneliia Wäckerlin1, Peter Fuchs1, Shiro Nishiwaki1, Lukas Zortea1, Ayodhya N Tiwari1, Stephan Buecheler1.
Abstract
Compositional grading has been widely exploited in highly efficient Cu(In,Ga)Se2, CdTe, GaAs, quantum dot solar cells, and this strategy has the potential to improve the performance of emerging perovskite solar cells. However, realizing and maintaining compositionally graded perovskite absorber from solution processing is challenging. Moreover, the operational stability of graded perovskite solar cells under long-term heat/light soaking has not been demonstrated. In this study, a facile partial ion-exchange approach is reported to achieve compositionally graded perovskite absorber layers. Incorporating compositional grading improves charge collection and suppresses interface recombination, enabling to fabricate near-infrared-transparent perovskite solar cells with power conversion efficiency of 16.8% in substrate configuration, and demonstrate 22.7% tandem efficiency with 3.3% absolute gain when mechanically stacked on a Cu(In,Ga)Se2 bottom cell. Non-encapsulated graded perovskite device retains over 93% of its initial efficiency after 1000 h operation at maximum power point at 60 °C under equivalent 1 sun illumination. The results open an avenue in exploring partial ion-exchange to design graded perovskite solar cells with improved efficiency and stability.Entities:
Keywords: NIR‐transparent perovskite solar cells; compositional grading; operational stability; partial ion‐exchange; tandem solar cells
Year: 2018 PMID: 29593970 PMCID: PMC5867048 DOI: 10.1002/advs.201700675
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adv Sci (Weinh) ISSN: 2198-3844 Impact factor: 16.806
Figure 1Compositionally graded perovskite absorber through partial ion‐exchange. a) Schematic device structure of NIR‐transparent perovskite solar cells (not to scale). The arrows represent the light illumination direction. b) Illustration of compositionally graded mixed‐cation lead mix‐halide perovskite absorbers prepared by partial ion‐exchange reaction. c) Schematics of the band diagram of the graded MAPbI3− Br absorber. E C and E V represent the energetic positions of the conduction band minimum and the valence band maximum, respectively. Front and rear refer to perovskite/PCBM and perovskite/PTAA interface, respectively. The arrows indicate the light illumination direction.
Figure 2Photovoltaic performance of graded MAPbI3− Br perovskite solar cells. a) The cross‐sectional SEM image and b) transmittance of graded MAPbI3− Br perovskite solar cell. c) The J–V curves and d) EQE spectra of substrate configuration NIR‐transparent perovskite solar cells. The graded perovskite absorber was prepared by spin coating MABr (2.5 mg mL−1 in isopropanol) solution on MAPbI3. The MAPbI3 reference was also presented for comparison. e) The maximum power point measurement (MPP) of the best NIR‐transparent device. The cells were characterized in ambient air with 50% relative humidity.
Figure 3Compositional grading. a) The high resolution X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) data of Br 3d core‐level spectra for PIE prepared absorber (MAPbI3:MABr 2.5 mg mL−1) and reference one (bare MAPbI3). Both absorbers are prepared according to same protocol for solar cells fabrication. b) The ToF‐SIMS depth profile of graded absorber after chlorobenzene vapor assisted thermal annealing (60 min at 100 °C). The Br depth profile in absorber prior to annealing is plotted for comparison.
Figure 4Operational stability at elevated temperature. a) The V OC, b) J SC, c) FF, and d) efficiency evolution of graded perovskite solar cells measured under STC after stressing at different conditions. Non‐encapsulated graded (MAPbI3:MABr (2.5 mg mL−1)) and reference (MAPbI3) devices were kept at MPP condition under continuous equivalent 1 sun illumination at various temperature for 1 week. White light emitting diodes (LEDs) array was employed as light source and temperature was controlled and monitored by temperature sensor near the device. The devices were stressed under full area illumination in 500 mbar N2 atmospheres. e) The photographs of graded perovskite (MAPbI3:MABr (2.5 mg mL−1)) cell after 1 week stress at 60 and 80 °C. f) The normalized efficiency of graded perovskite cells using FAPbI3:MABr (10 mg mL−1) absorbers. Power supply was unintentionally off during the measurement. g) The J–V curves and h) EQE spectra of graded mixed cations and mixed‐halide perovskite (FAPbI3:MABr (10 mg mL−1)) solar cells measured before and after 1000 h stress at 60 °C under STC.
Figure 5Perovskite‐CIGS thin‐film tandem solar cells. a) The J–V curves and b) EQE spectra of the perovskite‐CIGS thin‐film tandem solar cells in 4‐terminal configuration.
Photovoltaic parameters of the thin‐film perovskite‐CIGS solar cells in 4‐terminal tandem configuration. An absolute efficiency gain of 3.3% is achieved compared to the highest efficient subcell
| Solar cell |
|
| FF [%] | η [%] | MPP [%] | Cell area [cm2] | Absolute gain |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perovskite top cell | 1.116 | 19.9 | 75.7 | 16.8 | 16.8 | 0.273 | |
| CIGS (standalone) | 0.684 | 36.4 | 78.2 | 19.4 | 19.4 | 0.213 | |
| CIGS bottom cell | 0.645 | 11.6 | 78.1 | 5.9 | 5.9 | 0.213 | |
| Perovskite‐CIGS 4‐terminal tandem | 22.7 | 0.213 | 3.3% |