| Literature DB >> 29593896 |
Patrícia Vieira da Silva1, Lucimare Dos Santos Maciel1, Ludiele Souza Castro1, Paula Guerra Murat1, Minoru German Higa Junior1, Patrícia Honorato Zerlotti2, Ana Rita Coimbra Motta-Castro1, Elenir Rose Jardim Cury Pontes1, Maria Elizabeth Cavalheiros Dorval1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Intestinal parasites are a major source of health problems in developing countries, where socioeconomic, cultural, and environmental conditions contribute in maintaining the biological cycles of various parasites and facilitating their spread. The objective of this study, conducted in Corumbá, Mato Grosso do Sul state, Brazil, was to investigate the occurrence of intestinal parasites in riverside communities in the South Pantanal wetlands and conduct educational interventions focused on health and environmental preservation.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29593896 PMCID: PMC5822784 DOI: 10.1155/2018/6839745
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Parasitol Res ISSN: 2090-0023
Figure 1Location of the communities investigated. Source: ECOA, 2010.
Distribution of subjects, by presence or absence of enteroparasites, sex, age, and place of abode (n = 196).
| Variable | Enteroparasites |
| PR (95% CI) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Present | Absent | |||||
|
| % |
| % | |||
| Sex | ||||||
| Female | 84 | 74.3 | 29 | 25.7 | (1)0.383 | 1 |
| Male | 57 | 68.7 | 26 | 31.3 | 1.08 (0.90–1.30) | |
| Age range (years) | ||||||
| >40 | 16 | 94.1 | 1 | 5.9 |
(2)
| 1 |
| 21–40 | 22 | 78.6 | 6 | 21.4 | 1.20 (0.95–1.50) | |
| 11–20 | 23 | 79.3 | 6 | 20.7 | 1.19 (0.95–1.48) | |
| 6–10 | 34 | 72.3 | 13 | 27.7 | 1.30 (1.05–1.61) | |
| ≤5 | 16 | 50.0 | 16 | 50.0 | 1.88 (1.31–2.72) | |
| No data | 30 | 69.8 | 13 | 30.2 | - | |
| Place of abode | ||||||
| Paraguai Mirim | 80 | 72.7 | 30 | 27.3 | (1)0.930 | 1 |
| Barra de São Lourenço | 36 | 72.0 | 14 | 28.0 | 1.01 (0.82–1.24) | |
| Porto da Manga | 25 | 69.4 | 11 | 30.6 | 1.05 (0.82–1.34) | |
PR: prevalence ratio; (1)chi-squared test; (2)chi-square test of trends. Category “no data” was excluded from statistical calculations.
Figure 2Distribution of subjects (n = 141), by enteroparasite species detected (protozoans; helminths).