| Literature DB >> 29593790 |
Chang Chen1,2, Yao Chen3,4, Yunting Zhang2,4,5, Wanqi Sun6, Yanrui Jiang6, Yuanjin Song6, Qi Zhu1,6, Hao Mei1,2,7, Xiumin Wang3, Shijian Liu1,2,4, Fan Jiang1,4,6.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to investigate the association between dietary patterns and precocious puberty among Shanghai children.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29593790 PMCID: PMC5822782 DOI: 10.1155/2018/4528704
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Endocrinol ISSN: 1687-8337 Impact factor: 3.257
Characteristics of the study population.
| Variables | Boys ( | Girls ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Precocious puberty | 127 (3.01%) | 469 (23.07%) | <0.001 |
| Socioeconomic factor | |||
| Father's education level | 0.001 | ||
| Low | 1251 (30.51%) | 519 (26.13%) | |
| Middle | 1185 (41.59%) | 588 (29.61%) | |
| High | 1664 (58.41%) | 879 (44.26%) | |
| Mother's education level | 0.010 | ||
| Low | 1426 (35.14%) | 611 (31.22%) | |
| Middle | 1068 (26.32%) | 538 (27.49%) | |
| High | 1564 (38.54%) | 808 (41.29%) | |
| Total family income | 0.587 | ||
| Low | 806 (28.11%) | 382 (26.75%) | |
| Middle | 1340 (46.74%) | 672 (47.06%) | |
| High | 721 (25.15%) | 374 (26.19%) | |
| District | 0.461 | ||
| Suburban | 3491 (82.71%) | 1666 (81.95%) | |
| Urban | 730 (17.29%) | 367 (18.05%) | |
Notes. P value for chi-square test.
Dietary factors associated with precocious puberty as assessed by univariate analysis.
| Variables | Boys ( | Girls ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Vegetable | <0.001 | ||
| ≤3 times/week | 718 (17.55%) | 265 (13.34%) | |
| 4–6 times/week | 513 (12.54%) | 271 (13.65%) | |
| ≥1 times/day | 2860 (69.91%) | 1450 (73.01%) | |
| Fruit | 0.010 | ||
| ≤3 times/week | 921 (22.51%) | 380 (19.18%) | |
| 4–6 times/week | 796 (19.46%) | 416 (21.00%) | |
| ≥1 times/day | 2374 (58.03%) | 1185 (59.82%) | |
| Red meat | 0.178 | ||
| ≤3 times/week | 1408 (34.59%) | 729 (36.95%) | |
| 4–6 times/week | 795 (19.53%) | 381 (19.31%) | |
| ≥1 times/day | 1867 (45.87%) | 863 (43.74%) | |
| White meat | 0.224 | ||
| ≤1 time/week | 1025 (25.21%) | 538 (27.27%) | |
| 1–3 times/week | 2087 (51.33%) | 990 (50.18%) | |
| ≥4 times/week | 954 (23.46%) | 445 (22.55%) | |
| Aquatic and sea food | <0.001 | ||
| ≤1 time/week | 965 (23.75%) | 379 (19.17%) | |
| 1–3 times/week | 2207 (54.31%) | 1130 (57.16%) | |
| ≥4 times/week | 892 (21.95%) | 468 (23.67%) | |
| Dessert/snacks | 0.002 | ||
| ≤1 time/week | 864 (21.22%) | 352 (17.78%) | |
| 1–3 times/week | 1732 (42.54%) | 837 (42.27%) | |
| ≥4 times/week | 1475 (36.23%) | 791 (39.95%) | |
| Fried food | 0.006 | ||
| ≤1 time/month | 1568 (38.56%) | 831 (42.01%) | |
| 2-3 times/month | 1646 (40.48%) | 792 (40.04%) | |
| ≥1 time/week | 852 (20.95%) | 355 (17.95%) | |
| Neogala | 0.920 | ||
| No | 3529 (87.35%) | 1720 (87.44%) | |
| Yes | 511 (12.65%) | 247 (12.56%) | |
| Protein powder | 0.151 | ||
| No | 3487 (86.44%) | 1730 (87.77%) | |
| Yes | 547 (13.56%) | 241 (12.23%) | |
| Dairy product | <0.001 | ||
| ≤100 ml/day | 872 (21.69%) | 505 (25.88%) | |
| 100–300 ml/day | 2153 (53.56%) | 1115 (57.15%) | |
| ≥300 ml/day | 995 (24.75%) | 331 (16.97%) | |
| Soft drinks | <0.001 | ||
| ≤3 times/month | 1741 (42.93%) | 941 (47.67%) | |
| 1–3 times/week | 1590 (39.21%) | 742 (37.59%) | |
| ≥3 times/week | 724 (17.85%) | 291 (14.74%) |
Notes. P value for chi-square test.
Factor loading matrix for dietary patterns by exploratory factor analysis.
| Variable | Traditional diet pattern | Unhealthy diet pattern | Protein diet pattern |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vegetable |
| −0.249 | −0.06 |
| Fruit |
| −0.113 | 0.033 |
| Red meat |
| 0.204 | −0.138 |
| White meat |
|
| 0.086 |
| Aquatic and sea food |
| 0.149 | 0.109 |
| Dessert/snacks | 0.102 |
| −0.007 |
| Fried food | 0.010 |
| −0.005 |
| Neogala | 0.024 | 0.078 |
|
| Protein powder | −0.080 | 0.052 |
|
| Dairy product |
| −0.049 |
|
| Soft drinks | −0.034 |
| 0.126 |
| Eigenvalue | 2.117 | 1.807 | 1.280 |
| Percentage of variability | 19.244 | 16.424 | 11.640 |
Notes. Absolute factor loading values > 0.30 were labeled in bold.
Multivariate logistical regression for dietary patterns and precocious puberty.
| Traditional diet pattern | Unhealthy diet pattern | Protein diet pattern | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) |
| OR (95% CI) |
| OR (95% CI) |
| |
| Total | ||||||
| Model I | 1.01 (0.92–1.10) | 0.882 | 1.06 (0.97–1.16) | 0.171 | 0.92 (0.84–1.01) | 0.092 |
| Model II | 1.01 (0.92–1.10) | 0.903 | 1.04 (0.95–1.14) | 0.383 | 0.92 (0.83–1.01) | 0.076 |
| Model III | 0.93 (0.83–1.04) | 0.193 | 0.97 (0.86–1.08) | 0.524 | 0.96 (0.85–1.08) | 0.451 |
| Boys | ||||||
| | ||||||
| Model I | 0.48 (0.13–1.73) | 0.476 | 1.38 (0.44–4.33) | 0.579 | 1.13 (0.36–3.52) | 0.831 |
| Model II | 0.19 (0.02–1.45) | 0.108 | 1.35 (0.42–4.35) | 0.612 | 0.93 (0.20–4.32) | 0.923 |
| |
|
| 20.28 (0.40–1027.11) | 0.133 | 1.23 (0.16–9.45) | 0.843 |
| | ||||||
| Model I | 1.03 (0.65–1.62) | 0.915 | 1.43 (0.93–2.18) | 0.104 | 0.98 (0.62–1.53) | 0.915 |
| Model II | 1.03 (0.65–1.63) | 0.898 | 1.42 (0.92–2.17) | 0.113 | 0.98 (0.62–1.54) | 0.929 |
| Model III | 0.91 (0.50–1.67) | 0.769 | 1.04 (0.82–1.32) | 0.740 | 1.04 (0.60–1.80) | 0.885 |
| | ||||||
| Model I | 0.87 (0.71–1.07) | 0.190 |
|
| 1.10 (0.91–1.32) | 0.331 |
| Model II | 0.88 (0.71–1.08) | 0.214 | 1.21 (0.99–1.48) | 0.057 | 1.10 (0.91–1.32) | 0.337 |
| Model III | 0.89 (0.67–1.19) | 0.431 | 1.04 (0.80–1.36) | 0.762 | 1.11 (0.86–1.44) | 0.405 |
| Girls | ||||||
| | ||||||
| Model I | 1.15 (0.88–1.51) | 0.318 | 1.05 (0.80–1.38) | 0.742 | 0.82 (0.57–1.16) | 0.253 |
| Model II | 0.95 (0.71–1.28) | 0.753 | 1.02 (0.76–1.37) | 0.898 | 0.88 (0.61–1.28) | 0.504 |
| Model III | 0.88 (0.59–1.33) | 0.542 | 0.98 (0.66–1.46) | 0.910 | 1.17 (0.72–1.89) | 0.532 |
| | ||||||
| Model I | 0.88 (0.73–1.06) | 0.189 |
|
| 0.91 (0.80–1.04) | 0.161 |
| Model II | 0.89 (0.74–1.07) | 0.210 |
|
| 0.89 (0.77–1.02) | 0.098 |
| Model III | 0.87 (0.67–1.12) | 0.264 | 1.04 (0.82–1.32) | 0.740 | 0.97 (0.82–1.16) | 0.739 |
Notes. P < 0.05 were labeled in bold. Model I: unadjusted. Model II: adjustment for age and BMI. Model III: adjustment for father's education level, mother's education level, total family income, and district based on model II.