| Literature DB >> 29593702 |
Sib Sankar Giri1, Shib Sankar Sen2, Subrata Saha3, Venkatachalam Sukumaran4, Se Chang Park1.
Abstract
This study aimed to isolate potential probiotic lactic acid bacteria from a traditional rice-based fermented beverage "bhaati jaanr" and to evaluate their role during preparation of the beverage. Among various isolates, Lactobacillus plantarum strain L7 exhibited satisfactory in vitro probiotic characteristics such as acid resistance and bile tolerance, cell surface hydrophobicity, auto-aggregation, antibiotic susceptibility, and antimicrobial activities. Therefore, performance of L7 as a starter culture in rice fermentation was determined during a 6-day rice fermentation study. L. plantarum L7 decreased the pH, associated with an increase in total titratable acidity and organic acid production up to the 4th day of fermentation. The highest concentrations of succinic acid (0.37 mg/g), lactic acid (4.95 mg/g), and acetic acid (0.36 mg/g) were recorded on the 3rd, 4th, and 5th days of fermentation, respectively. Saccharifying (148.13 μg/min g-1) and liquefying (89.47 μg/min g-1) activities were the highest on days 3 and 2, respectively, and thereafter, they decreased. Phytase activity and the cleavage of free minerals (sodium, calcium, magnesium, manganese, and ferrous) increased up to days 3-4. The concentration of various accumulated malto-oligosaccharides (glucose, fructose, maltotriose, and maltoterose) was noted to be the maximum on days 4 and 5. Furthermore, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis indicated the presence of various volatile compounds. The fermented material also exhibited 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl and 2,2'-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid) radical scavenging activity. Therefore, the probiotic, L. plantarum L7, has a significant role in the fermentation of this beverage and enhances its functional properties.Entities:
Keywords: Lactobacillus plantarum L7; fermented rice-beverage; minerals; probiotics; sugars; volatile compounds
Year: 2018 PMID: 29593702 PMCID: PMC5861207 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00473
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Assessment of viability of isolated strains to low pH and bile salts during 4 h of incubation.
| Control (0 h) | 7.9 ± 0.11 | 7.7 ± 0.13 | 7.7 ± 0.10 | 8.0 ± 0.07 | 7.9 ± 0.16 | 7.8 ± 0.06 | 7.9 ± 0.11 | 8.1 ± 0.14 | 7.9 ± 0.11 |
| pH 2.0 (4 h) | 2.7 ± 0.05 | 1.9 ± 0.08 | 3.4 ± 0.12 | 5.2 ± 0.16 | 0 | 1.7 ± 0.12 | 5.8 ± 0.21 | 0 | 0.8 ± 0.06 |
| pH 3.0 (4 h) | 4.1 ± 0.24 | 3.5 ± 0.19 | 4.3 ± 0.14 | 6.3 ± 0.27 | 1.3 ± 0.11 | 3.2 ± 0.24 | 7.1 ± 0.14 | 0.6 ± 0.03 | 1.2 ± 0.08 |
| Control (0 h) | 7.8 ± 0.23 | 7.72 ± 0.16 | 7.91 ± 0.19 | 7.83 ± 0.21 | 8.06 ± 0.13 | 7.63 ± 0.14 | 7.74 ± 0.26 | 7.93 ± 0.18 | 7.68 ± 0.2 |
| 0.3% (4 h) | 2.4 ± 0.07 | 1.9 ± 0.04 | 5.6 ± 0.32 | 6.4 ± 0.24 | 4.2 ± 0.15 | 3.8 ± 0.17 | 6.9 ± 0.3 | 2.8 ± 0.14 | 5.1 ± 0.18 |
Results are shown as mean ± S.D (n = 3).
Assessment of cell-surface hydrophobicity (%) and auto-aggregation (%) activities of lactobacilli isolates as measured after 4 h of incubation.
| L1 | 21.4 ± 0.17 | 5.1 ± 0.11 |
| L2 | 34.1 ± 1.2 | 17.8 ± 0.73 |
| L3 | 13.6 ± 0.07 | 14.3 ± 0.81 |
| L4 | 47.8 ± 2.4 | 41.4 ± 0.93 |
| L5 | 18.3 ± 0.63 | 22.4 ± 1.03 |
| L6 | 42.4 ± 1.4 | 28.6 ± 1.1 |
| L7 | 61.4 ± 1.9 | 39.4 ± 1.4 |
| L8 | 16.4 ± 0.44 | 7.3 ± 0.26 |
| L9 | 39.4 ± 0.57 | 14.9 ± 1.03 |
Results are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3).
Antagonistic activity of culture supernatants of LAB strains against pathogenic bacteria.
| L1 | + | − | ++ | − |
| L2 | +++ | + | + | ++ |
| L3 | + | + | ++ | + |
| L4 | +++ | ++ | ++++ | +++ |
| L5 | − | + | ++ | + |
| L6 | ++ | − | + | |
| L7 | ++++ | +++ | +++ | ++++ |
| L8 | ++ | + | + | ++ |
| L9 | − | + | − | ++ |
: − < 1 mm inhibition zone, +: > 1 mm inhibition zone, ++ > 2 mm inhibition zone, +++ > 4 mm inhibition zone, ++++ > 5 mm inhibition zone.
Changes in pH, total titrable acidity (TTA), alcohol (ethanol) content during fermentation.
| 0 | 6.76 ± 0.09 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | ND |
| 1 | 6.45 ± 0.05 | 0.21 ± 0.02 | ND |
| 2 | 5.59 ± 0.03 | 0.58 ± 0.05 | 0.06 ± 0.01 |
| 3 | 4.68 ± 0.11 | 0.73 ± 0.02 | 0.14 ± 0.03 |
| 4 | 3.54 ± 0.09 | 0.86 ± 0.06 | 0.23 ± 0.02 |
| 5 | 3.68 ± 0.10 | 0.83 ± 0.04 | 0.38 ± 0.04 |
| 6 | 3.81 ± 0.08 | 0.78 ± 0.02 | 0.36 ± 0.03 |
Results are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). ND, not detected.
Organic acids production by the action of Lactobacillus plantarum L7 during the course of fermentation.
| 0 | ND | ND | ND |
| 1 | 0.76 ± 0.04 | 0.16 ± 0.01 | 0.24 ± 0.02 |
| 2 | 1.64 ± 0.06 | 0.24 ± 0.01 | 0.28 ± 0.01 |
| 3 | 2.53 ± 0.07 | 0.29 ± 0.04 | 0.37 ± 0.03 |
| 4 | 4.95 ± 0.09 | 0.35 ± 0.03 | 0.19 ± 0.01 |
| 5 | 4.03 ± 0.10 | 0.36 ± 0.04 | 0.08 ± 0.01 |
| 6 | 3.69 ± 0.04 | 0.27 ± 0.03 | ND |
Figure 1Evolution of lactobacilli population during the course of fermentation. Results are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3).
Figure 2Saccharifying and liquefying activity on various days during rice fermentation. Results are presented through quadratic and cubic regression with respect to day. (A) Saccharifying activity = −80.133+122.605×Day−17.01×Day2 (R2 = 0.900); Saccharifying activity = −188.206+258.55×Day−62.04×Day2 + 4.24×Day3 (R2 = 0.997). (B) Liquefying activity = 1.03+51.25×Day−8.38×Day2 (R2 = 0.851); Liquefying activity = −66.09+135.68×Day−36.35×Day2 + 2.66×Day3 (R2 = 0.960).
Concentration of minerals during the course of rice fermentation.
| 0 | 0.44 ± 0.41 | 0.78 ± 0.06 | 6.03 ± 0.13 | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.01 ± 0.005 | |
| 1 | 0.79 ± 0.05 | 0.59 ± 0.03 | 0.81 ± 0.02 | 6.17 ± 0.1 | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 0.03 ± 0.005 |
| 2 | 1.11 ± 0.03 | 0.77 ± 0.02 | 1.02 ± 0.06 | 6.45 ± 0.06 | 0.16 ± 0.03 | 0.08 ± 0.01 |
| 3 | 3.64 ± 0.11 | 0.81 ± 0.06 | 1.34 ± 0.06 | 6.91 ± 0.06 | 0.30 ± 0.06 | 0.21 ± 0.02 |
| 4 | 7.81 ± 0.24 | 0.92 ± 0.04 | 1.16 ± 0.08 | 6.53 ± 0.08 | 0.09 ± 0.02 | 0.26 ± 0.03 |
| 5 | 6.39 ± 0.1 | 0.67 ± 0.02 | 0.92 ± 0.05 | 6.26 ± 0.09 | 0.016 ± 0.01 | 0.15 ± 0.01 |
| 6 | 4.31 ± 0.12 | 0.47 ± 0.04 | 0.74 ± 0.06 | 5.74 ± 0.07 | 0.01 ± 0.01 | 0.07 ± 0.01 |
Values are shown as mean ± S.D (n = 3).
Figure 3Accumulation of different sugars during the rice fermentation with respect to day. Results are presented using cubic regression. Maltose = 20.61−18.681D+9.257D2−1.060D3 (R2 = 0.956); Maltotriose = 10.133+1.983D+1.585 D2−0.277D3 (R2 = 0.978); Tetrose = 8.009−8.871D+4.326 D2−0.527D3 (R2 = 0.937); Fructose = 11.322−10.99D+7.518 D2−.953D3 (R2 = 0.98); Glucose = 9.767−4.462D+6.665 D2−0.872 D3 (R2 = 0.986).
Radical scavenging activities of fermented rice as measured by DPPH and ABTS assays.
| 0 | 7.36 ± 0.35a | 9.3 ± 0.47a |
| 1 | 13.16 ± 0.7b | 11.4 ± 0.31a |
| 2 | 22.43 ± 1.04c | 17.18 ± 0.43b |
| 3 | 36.26 ± 1.32d | 28.62 ± 0.61c |
| 4 | 51.9 ± 1.2e | 43.82 ± 0.68d |
| 5 | 62.56 ± 0.7f | 42.1 ± 0.32d |
| 6 | 47.46 ± 1.03e | 29.84 ± 0.41c |
Results are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). Values in the same column with different superscripts letters are significantly different (P < 0.05).
Compound identified fermented rice by GC-MS analysis.
| 1 | 3.491 | Ethanol | 3.48 ± 0.28 |
| 2 | 6.092 | Butanoic acid | 0.25 ± 0.02 |
| 3 | 10.83 | Propanoic acid | 0.32 ± 0.03 |
| 4 | 11.27 | Diethylene glycol, DI-TMS | 0.26 ± 0.09 |
| 5 | 11.48 | Pentanoic acid | 0.55 ± 0.05 |
| 6 | 11.76 | Isoamyl alcohol | 8.17 ± 0.5 |
| 7 | 11.82 | Heptanoic acid, ethyl ester | 3.77 ± 0.29 |
| 8 | 13.20 | 2-Propanol | 6.28 ± 0.59 |
| 9 | 13.55 | Glycerol | 0.55 ± 0.045 |
| 10 | 15.26 | Propanedioic acid | 12.01 ± 1.2 |
| 11 | 15.45 | Lactic acid ethyl ester | 0.48 ± 0.048 |
| 12 | 16.63 | Glutamic acid ethyl ester | 0.25 ± 0.18 |
| 13 | 17.83 | Octanoic acid ethyl ester | 23.58 ± 2.0 |
| 14 | 19.37 | Butanol | 1.56 ± 0.1 |
| 15 | 19.47 | 2-Pyrrolidone carboxylic acid ethyl ester | 0.64 ± 0.06 |
| 16 | 19.64 | Benzaldehyde | 4.01 ± 0.35 |
| 17 | 19.83 | Nonanoic acid ethyl ester | 0.27 ± 0.025 |
| 18 | 21.17 | Hexadecanoic acid | 0.26 ± 0.028 |
| 19 | 22.49 | Decanoic acid ethyl ester | 3.49 ± 0.28 |
| 20 | 21.55 | Octanoic acid, Trimethylsilyl ester | 0.64 ± 0.062 |
| 21 | 22.77 | 9,12-Octadecadienoic acid | 0.48 ± 0.045 |
| 22 | 23.49 | Hexadecanoic acid | 0.59 ± 0.056 |
| 23 | 26.19 | Succinic acid diethyl ester | 28.11 ± 2.8 |
Peak area are presented as mean ± SD of two independent experiments.