| Literature DB >> 29593553 |
Alessandra Giuliani1, Serena Mazzoni1, Alessandra Ruggiu2, Barbara Canciani2, Ranieri Cancedda2, Sara Tavella2.
Abstract
Bone remodeling process consists in a slow building phase and in faster resorption with the objective to maintain a functional skeleton locomotion to counteract the Earth gravity. Thus, during spaceflights, the skeleton does not act against gravity, with a rapid decrease of bone mass and density, favoring bone fracture. Several studies approached the problem by imaging the bone architecture and density of cosmonauts returned by the different spaceflights. However, the weaknesses of the previously reported studies was two-fold: on the one hand the research suffered the small statistical sample size of almost all human spaceflight studies, on the other the results were not fully reliable, mainly due to the fact that the observed bone structures were small compared with the spatial resolution of the available imaging devices. The recent advances in high-resolution X-ray tomography have stimulated the study of weight-bearing skeletal sites by novel approaches, mainly based on the use of the mouse and its various strains as an animal model, and sometimes taking advantage of the synchrotron radiation support to approach studies of 3D bone architecture and mineralization degree mapping at different hierarchical levels. Here we report the first, to our knowledge, systematic review of the recent advances in studying the skeletal bone architecture by high-resolution X-ray tomography after submission of mice models to microgravity constrains.Entities:
Keywords: animal model; bone microarchitecture; high-resolution tomography; mice; microgravity; synchrotron radiation
Year: 2018 PMID: 29593553 PMCID: PMC5859385 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00181
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
Figure 1MDS spaceflight mission. Femurs of mice housed for 3 months in the International Space Station (ISS). (A–C) Wt2 (A), PTN-Tg1 (B), PTN-Tg2 (C) color map of trabecular thickness distribution of vivarium (representative sample), ground and flight mice. (D,E) Quantification of cortical thickness distribution in Wt (D) and PTN-Tg (E) vivarium control (average on 3 mice), ground and flight mice. (F,G) Cortical thickness color maps of representative 3D reconstructions in Wt2 vivarium, ground and flight (F) and in PTN-Tg2 vivarium, ground, and flight (G). (A–C) were originally published in Figure 1 of (Tavella et al., 2012). (D–G) were originally published in Figure 3 of (Tavella et al., 2012).
Main spaceflight mission experiences: parameters and results on the mice skeletal bone architecture studied by high-resolution tomography (microCT).
| STS-108 | 2-month-old C57BL6/J (female) | Tibias, humerus | μCT20; Scanco Medical AG; Brüttisellen, Switzerland | Humerus microarchitecture not changed by spaceflight; |
| STS-131 | 16-week-old C57BL/6J (female) | Ischium region in the right coxa | Scanner 1,174; SkyScan; Kontich, Belgium | Microgravity induced ischium bone loss without reducing BMD |
| MDS | 2-month-old C57BLJ10 and pleiotrophin-transgenic (male) | Femur, spine, calvaria | SYRMEP beamline; ELETTRA Synchrotron Facility; Trieste, Italy | Microgravity induced bone loss in weight-bearing sites (femur and spine); |
| Bion-M1 | 23-week-old C57/BL6 (male) | Left femurs, L3 and T12 vertebrae | VivaCT40, Scanco Medical, Bassersdorf, Switzerland | Microgravity negatively affected the femur and lumbar vertebrae, but not the thoracic vertebrae; |
| Cortical femur | ID19 beamline; ESRF Synchrotron Facility; Grenoble, France | Spaceflight induces osteocyte death, possibly responsible for bone resorption and consequent bone loss | ||
| 19/20-weeks-old C57BL/6 (male) | Caudal motion segments of the spine | μCT 50, SCANCO Medical, Brüttisellen, Switzerland | Microgravity significantly reduced vertebral bone volume fraction, BMD, and trabecular thickness; | |
| JAXA | 5-week-old C57BL/6 J (male) | Right femurs | ScanXmate-A100S Scanner; Comscantechno, Yokohama, Japan | Artificial |
Lloyd et al., 2015;
Blaber et al., 2013;
Tavella et al., 2012;
Gerbaix et al., 2017;
Berg-Johansen et al., 2016;
Shiba et al., .