| Literature DB >> 29593130 |
Andrew C Bishop1, Mark Libardoni, Ahsan Choudary, Biswapriya Misra, Kenneth Lange, John Bernal, Mark Nijland, Cun Li, Michael Olivier, Peter W Nathanielsz, Laura A Cox.
Abstract
Rodent and nonhuman primate studies indicate that developmental programming by reduced perinatal nutrition negatively impacts life course cardio-metabolic health. We have developed a baboon model in which we feed control mothers (CON) ad libitum while nutrient restricted mothers are fed 70% of ad libitum global feed in pregnancy and lactation. Offspring of nutrient restricted mothers are intrauterine growth restricted (IUGR) at term. By 3.5 years IUGR baboons showed signs of insulin resistance, indicating a pre-diabetic phenotype, in contrast to healthy CON offspring. We hypothesized that a novel breath analysis approach would provide markers of the altered cardio-metabolic state in a non-invasive manner. Here we assess whether exhaled breath volatile organic compounds (VOCs) collected from this unique cohort of juvenile baboons with documented cardio-metabolic dysfunction resulting from in utero programming can be detected from their breath signatures. Breath was collected from male and female CON and IUGR baboons at 4.8 ± 0.2 years (human equivalent ∼13 years). Breath VOCs were quantified using a two-dimensional gas chromatography mass spectrometer. Two-way ANOVA, on 76 biologically relevant VOCs identified 27 VOCs (p < 0.05) with altered abundances between groups (sex, birthweight, and sex x birthweight). The 27 VOCs included 2-pentanone, 2-octanone, 2,2,7,7-tetramethyloctane and 3-methyl-1-heptene, which have not previously been associated with cardio-metabolic disease. Unsupervised principal component analysis of these VOCs could discriminate the four clusters defining males, females, CON and IUGR. This study, which is the first to assess quantifiable breath signatures associated with cardio-metabolic programing for any model of IUGR, demonstrates the translational value of this unique model to identify metabolites of programmed cardio-metabolic dysfunction in breath signatures. Future studies are required to validate the translatability of these findings to humans.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29593130 PMCID: PMC6364675 DOI: 10.1088/1752-7163/aaba84
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Breath Res ISSN: 1752-7155 Impact factor: 3.262
Figure 1.GC × GC-MS total ion chromatogram for breath metabolomics in NHP breath samples collected in a heavy matrix of isoflurane. A contour plot of GC × GC chromatogram as a retention plane of both dimensions and a clear separation of the isoflurane (highlighted red box) across the lower primary dimension (x -axis) from the breath metabolites, which elute in the second dimension (y axis).
Figure 2.A Venn diagram representing aligned VOCs. A four group Venn diagram showing VOCs present in individual baboon groups and overlapping groups. 148 VOCs were present in all samples.
Figure 3.Data filtering workflow. VOCs present in all groups, having potential biological relevance and statistically significant differences (two-way ANOVA, nominal and adjusted p < 0.05) reduced from 1059 to 27 discriminatory VOCs.
Differentially expressed VOCs by sex.
| Identification | Chemical class | Nominal | Adjusted | Fold change (female versus male) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,5-diisopropyl-2,3-dimethyl-cyclohexane | Cyclic alkane | 1.07E-04 | 5.51E-03 | −4.0 |
| 2,5,6-trimethyl-decane | Branched alkane | 1.04E-03 | 1.58E-02 | −3.8 |
| 2,2,6-trimethyl-octane | Branched alkane | 1.80E-02 | 1.47E-01 | −10.1 |
| 1,5-diethyl-2,3-dimethyl-cyclohexane | Cyclic alkane | 1.94E-02 | 1.47E-01 | 4.0 |
| (E,E)-2,4-Heptadiene | Alkene | 3.50E-02 | 4.96E-01 | 1.8 |
| 3-ethyl-phenol | Cyclic alcohol | 4.24E-02 | 2.63E-01 | 2.2 |
| 2,3,6-trimethyl-heptane | Branched alkane | 4.50E-02 | 2.63E-01 | 39.4 |
| 2,2,7,7-tetramethyloctane | Branched alkane | 2.11E-03 | 6.62E-01 | −4.9 |
| 2-pentanone | Ketone | 3.79E-04 | 2.67E-02 | 6.7 |
| 1-hydroxy-cyclohexanecarboxylic acid | Carboxylic acid | 3.16E-03 | 3.43E-02 | 1.8 |
| 2-decanone | Ketone | 1.45E-04 | 5.51E-03 | 1.1 |
| 2-octanone | Ketone | 1.72E-02 | 9.59E03 | −8.6 |
| 3,7-dimethyl-decane | Branched alkane | 7.21E-04 | 1.37E-02 | −12.0 |
Differentially expressed VOCs by IUGR.
| Identification | Chemical class | Nominal | Adjusted | Fold change (IUGR versus CON) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,3-dimethyl-benzene | Cyclic alkene | 4.63E-03 | 8.80E-02 | −4.0 |
| 1,2-diethyl-cyclooctane | Cyclic alkane | 7.14E-03 | 1.06E-01 | 5.6 |
| 1,7-Dimethyl-4-(1-methylethyl)cyclodecane | Cyclic alkane | 1.28E-02 | 3.85E-01 | −2.6 |
| trans-1,3-dimethyl-2-methylene-cyclohexane | Cyclic alkane | 1.38E-02 | 1.06E-01 | −6.6 |
| 2,6-dimethyl-octane | Branched alkane | 1.39E-02 | 1.06E-01 | −2.2 |
| 3-methyl-1-heptene | Branched alkene | 1.61E-02 | 1.11E-01 | 5.9 |
| camphene | Monoterpene | 2.74E-02 | 1.74E-01 | 1.9 |
| 2-pentanone | Ketone | 2.43E-03 | 3.01E-02 | −3.6 |
| 1-hydroxy-cyclohexanecarboxylic acid | Carboxylic acid | 3.94E-03 | 8.80E-02 | 1.7 |
| 2-octanone | Ketone | 1.04E-02 | 8.80E-02 | 15.3 |
| 6-ethyl-2-methyl-octane | Branched alkane | 1.37E-02 | 1.06E-01 | 2.4 |
| 2,2,7,7-tetramethyloctane | Branched alkane | 3.96E-04 | 4.84E-01 | 12.1 |
Differentially expressed VOCs for the discrimination of sex x birthweight.
| Identification | Chemical class | Nominal | Adjusted | Nominal | Adjusted | Nominal | Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,2,7,7-tetramethyloctane | Branched Alkane | 2.11E-03 | 6.62E-01 | 3.96E-04 | 4.84E-01 | 9.15E-04 | 8.68E-01 |
| 2-pentanone | Ketone | 3.79E-04 | 2.67E-02 | 2.43E-03 | 3.01E-02 | 2.58E-03 | 6.95E-02 |
| 1-hydroxy-cyclo-hex-anecarboxylic acid | Carboxylic Acid | 3.16E-03 | 3.43E-02 | 3.94E-03 | 8.80E-02 | 7.43E-03 | 1.14E-01 |
| (E)-4-octene | Alkene | 9.88E-01 | 6.49E-01 | 8.82E-01 | 4.31E-01 | 7.76E-03 | 7.00E-01 |
| 4-nonene | Alkene | 5.96E-01 | 9.88E-01 | 5.59E-02 | 9.06E-01 | 7.99E-03 | 1.14E-01 |
| 2-decanone | Ketone | 1.45E-04 | 5.51E-03 | 4.57E-01 | 6.43E-01 | 9.02E-03 | 1.14E-01 |
| 2-octanone | Ketone | 1.72E-02 | 9.59E-03 | 1.04E-02 | 8.80E-02 | 1.17E-02 | 9.81E-02 |
| 2,3,6,7-tetramethyl-octane | Branched alkane | 8.99E-01 | 9.62E-01 | 5.92E-02 | 2.96E-01 | 1.49E-02 | 1.41E-01 |
| 2-ethyl-hexanal | Aldehyde | 1.70E-01 | 4.96E-01 | 6.73E-01 | 7.79E-01 | 2.37E-02 | 2.00E-01 |
| 3,7-dimethyl-decane | Branched alkane | 7.21E-04 | 1.37E-02 | 7.62E-02 | 2.96E-01 | 3.42E-02 | 2.40E-01 |
| 2,6,8-trimethyl-decane | Branched alkane | 9.25E-01 | 9.64E-01 | 7.20E-01 | 7.90E-01 | 3.57E-02 | 2.40E-01 |
| 6-ethyl-2-methyl-octane | Branched alkane | 3.74E-01 | 6.38E-01 | 1.37E-02 | 1.06E-01 | 3.85E-02 | 2.40E-01 |
| 2-methyl-2-butanol | Alcohol | 8.83E-01 | 6.49E-01 | 6.37E-01 | 7.79E-01 | 4.10E-02 | 6.68E-01 |
Figure 4.PCA reveals breath signatures that can discriminate sex and birthweight. PCA of 27 discriminately identified VOCs cluster into four specific groups (highlighted red ovals) explaining 71.1% of the total variation in the data, a PC1 (28%), PC2 (23.9%) and PC3 (19.2%).