Literature DB >> 2959215

The early fate of venous repair after civilian vascular trauma. A clinical, hemodynamic, and venographic assessment.

J Meyer1, J Walsh, J Schuler, J Barrett, J Durham, J Eldrup-Jorgensen, T Schwarcz, D P Flanigan.   

Abstract

Repair of major venous injuries of the extremities has been advocated to improve limb salvage rates and to prevent the early and late sequelae of venous interruption. The contribution of venous repair to the surgical outcome remains controversial, however, in part because the fate of venous reconstruction has previously not been well defined. The current study was done to determine the early patency rate of venous repair, to compare the accuracy of various methods used to assess venous patency, and to analyze the relationship between early venous patency and surgical outcome. During a recent 27-month period, 36 patients with major extremity venous injuries were treated by venous reconstruction; 34 patients (94%) had an associated major arterial injury that also required repair. Venous repair was performed in the upper extremity (22%) as well as the lower extremity (78%) using various reconstructive methods, including lateral repair (17%), end-to-end anastomosis (11%), autogenous vein patching (25%), interposition autogenous vein grafting (42%), and panelled autogenous vein grafting (6%). After operation, venous repair patency was evaluated by clinical examination, impedence plethysmography, and Doppler ultrasonography, and contrast venography. There were no perioperative deaths in these 36 patients. The limb salvage rate was 100% and all 34 major arterial repairs were patent at the time of hospital discharge. Venography performed on the seventh postoperative day demonstrated that 14 venous repairs had thrombosed (39%) and that 22 had remained patent (61%). Local venous repair had a significantly lower thrombosis rate (21%) than those requiring interposition vein grafting (59%) (p less than 0.03). Compared with venography, the clinical evaluation was 67% accurate in the assessment of venous repair patency, and the noninvasive examination was 53% accurate. In conclusion, a substantial percentage of venous repairs will thrombose in the postoperative period, especially if interposition vein grafting is used. However, in this series limb salvage was not adversely influenced by an unexpectedly high rate of venous repair thrombosis. In addition, clinical evaluation and noninvasive testing did not provide an accurate assessment of venous patency after venous repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 2959215      PMCID: PMC1493229          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-198710000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  17 in total

1.  Battle Injuries of the Arteries in World War II : An Analysis of 2,471 Cases.

Authors:  M E Debakey; F A Simeone
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1946-04       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Repair of lower extremity venous trauma: a more aggressive approach required.

Authors:  N M Rich; R W Hobson; C B Wright; C W Fedde
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1974-08

3.  Clinical recanalization of an autogenous vein graft in the popliteal vein.

Authors:  N M Rich; W G Sullivan
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1972-10

4.  Vietnam vascular registry: a preliminary report.

Authors:  N M Rich; C W Hughes
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1969-01       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Long-term patency of venous repairs demonstrated by venography.

Authors:  T J Phifer; A J Gerlock; N M Rich; J C McDonald
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1985-04

6.  Amputation risk factors in concomitant superficial femoral artery and vein injuries.

Authors:  T J Phifer; A J Gerlock; W A Vekovius; N M Rich; J C McDonald
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Principles and indications for primary venous repair.

Authors:  N M Rich
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 3.982

8.  Venous injury: to repair or ligate, the dilemma.

Authors:  G A Timberlake; R C O'Connell; M D Kerstein
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 4.268

9.  Management of traumatic peripheral vein injuries. Primary repair or vein ligation.

Authors:  W D Hardin; M F Adinolfi; R C O'Connell; M D Kerstein
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Experience with 115 civilian venous injuries.

Authors:  N Agarwal; P M Shah; R H Clauss; B M Reynolds; W M Stahl
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1982-10
View more
  7 in total

1.  Traumatic injuries to the subclavian and axillary arteries: a 13-year review.

Authors:  Murat Aksoy; Fatih Tunca; Hakan Yanar; Recep Guloglu; Cemalettin Ertekin; Mehmet Kurtoglu
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  [Vascular injuries in extremities].

Authors:  V Ruppert; M Sadeghi-Azandaryani; W Mutschler; B Steckmeier
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Vascular Trauma in the Extremities: Factors Associated with the Outcome and Assessment of Amputation Indexes.

Authors:  Chien-Hui Lee; Yu-Jun Chang; Tzong-Shiun Li; Ying-Cheng Chen; Yung-Kun Hsieh
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 1.800

4.  Iatrogenic major venous injuries incurred during cancer surgery.

Authors:  Gursel Levent Oktar
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2007-04-30       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Vascular complications and special problems in vascular trauma.

Authors:  M J Martin; A J Perez-Alonso; J A Asensio
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 3.693

6.  Vascular injuries of the extremities are a major challenge in a third world country.

Authors:  Fahad H Khan; Kamal M Yousuf; Anel R Bagwani
Journal:  J Trauma Manag Outcomes       Date:  2015-07-30

Review 7.  Management of Peripheral and Truncal Venous Injuries.

Authors:  Triantafillos G Giannakopoulos; Efthymios D Avgerinos
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2017-08-24
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.