Literature DB >> 29590669

Colonoscopic perforations in the English National Health Service Bowel Cancer Screening Programme.

Edmund Derbyshire1, Pali Hungin2, Claire Nickerson3, Matthew D Rutter4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Perforation is the most serious adverse event associated with colonoscopy. In this study of data from the English National Health Service Bowel Cancer Screening Programme, we aimed to describe the presentation and management of perforations, and to determine factors associated with poorer outcomes post-perforation.
METHODS: The medical records of patients with a perforation following the national screening colonoscopy were retrospectively examined. All colonoscopies performed from 02/08/2006 to 13/03/2014 were studied. Bowel Cancer Screening Centres across England were contacted and asked to complete a detailed dataset relating to perforation presentation, management, and outcome.
RESULTS: 263 129 colonoscopies were analyzed, and the rate of perforation was 0.06 %. Complete data were reviewed for 117 perforations: 70.1 % of perforations (82/117) occurred during therapeutic colonoscopies; 54.9 % (62/113) of patients with perforations who were admitted to hospital and in whom data were complete underwent surgery; 26.1 % (30/115) of hospitalized patients left the hospital with a stoma and 19.1 % (22/115) developed post-perforation morbidity. Perforations not detected during colonoscopy were significantly more likely to require surgery (P = 0.03). Diagnostic perforations were significantly more likely to require surgery (P = 0.002) and were associated with higher rates of post-perforation morbidity (P = 0.01). At presentation, the presence of abdominal pain (P = 0.01), a pulse rate > 100 beats per minute (P = 0.049), and a respiratory rate > 20 breaths per minute (P = 0.01) were significantly associated with the patient having surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest retrospective observational case series in Europe to describe post-perforation presentation, management, and outcomes. We have confirmed that perforation leads to surgical intervention, stoma formation, and post-perforation morbidity. Perforations not recognized during the colonoscopy were significantly more likely to require surgery. Diagnostic perforations were at greater risk of requiring surgery and developing post-perforation morbidity. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29590669     DOI: 10.1055/a-0584-7138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  6 in total

Review 1.  From Beyond the Grave: Use of Medical Information from the Deceased to Guide Care of Living Relatives.

Authors:  Shereen Tadros; Helena Carley; Anneke Lucassen
Journal:  Curr Genet Med Rep       Date:  2020-11-24

2.  Digestive perforations related to endoscopy procedures: a local management charter based on local evidence and experts' opinion.

Authors:  Gaspard Bertrand; Jérôme Rivory; Maud Robert; Jean-Christophe Saurin; Élise Pelascini; Olivier Monneuse; Laurent Gruner; Gilles Poncet; Pierre-Jean Valette; Hélène Gimonet; Florian Rostain; Charles-Éric Ber; Yves Bouffard; André Boibieux; Marina Ciochina; Verena Landel; Hélène Boyer; Jérémie Jacques; Thierry Ponchon; Mathieu Pioche
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2022-04-14

Review 3.  From advanced diagnosis to advanced resection in early neoplastic colorectal lesions: Never-ending and trending topics in the 2020s.

Authors:  Francesco Auriemma; Sandro Sferrazza; Mario Bianchetti; Maria Flavia Savarese; Laura Lamonaca; Danilo Paduano; Nicole Piazza; Enrica Giuffrida; Lupe Sanchez Mete; Alessandra Tucci; Sebastian Manuel Milluzzo; Chiara Iannelli; Alessandro Repici; Benedetto Mangiavillano
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2022-07-27

Review 4.  Imaging alternatives to colonoscopy: CT colonography and colon capsule. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) Guideline - Update 2020.

Authors:  Cristiano Spada; Cesare Hassan; Davide Bellini; David Burling; Giovanni Cappello; Cristina Carretero; Evelien Dekker; Rami Eliakim; Margriet de Haan; Michal F Kaminski; Anastasios Koulaouzidis; Andrea Laghi; Philippe Lefere; Thomas Mang; Sebastian Manuel Milluzzo; Martina Morrin; Deirdre McNamara; Emanuele Neri; Silvia Pecere; Mathieu Pioche; Andrew Plumb; Emanuele Rondonotti; Manon Cw Spaander; Stuart Taylor; Ignacio Fernandez-Urien; Jeanin E van Hooft; Jaap Stoker; Daniele Regge
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Paradigm shift in management of acute iatrogenic colonic perforations: 24-year retrospective comprehensive study.

Authors:  Gregorios A Paspatis; Maria Fragaki; Magdalini Velegraki; Afroditi Mpitouli; Pinelopi Nikolaou; Georgios Tribonias; Evangelos Voudoukis; Konstantinos Karmiris; Angeliki Theodoropoulou; Emmanouil Vardas
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2021-05-27

6.  Endoscopic Treatment of Iatrogenic Perforation of Sigmoid Diverticulum: A Case Report of Multidisciplinary Management.

Authors:  Giacomo Emanuele Maria Rizzo; Giuseppina Ferro; Giovanna Rizzo; Giovanni Di Carlo; Alessandro Cantone; Gaetano Giuseppe Di Vita; Carmelo Sciumè
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2021-06-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.