Literature DB >> 29590356

Evaluating the quality of antenatal care and pregnancy outcomes using content and utilization assessment.

Ping Ling Yeoh1,2, Klaus Hornetz3, Nor Izzah Ahmad Shauki4, Maznah Dahlui1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the adequacy of antenatal care (ANC) and its association with pregnancy outcomes using an approach that includes adequacy of both utilization and content.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Women attending ANC at public-funded primary health clinics where data were extracted from individual records.
METHODS: Adequacy of utilization assessment was based on the concept of Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization index; adequacy of content assessed the recommended routine care received by the women according to local guidelines. Association between adequacy and pregnancy outcomes was examined using binary logistic regression. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pregnancy outcomes included preterm birth and low birth weight.
RESULTS: Sixty-three percent of women showed higher than recommended ANC utilization; 52% had <80% of recommended routine care content. Although not statistically significant, the odds of preterm birth was lower among women with adequate level of utilization compared with inadequate (adjusted odds ratios (aOR) = 2.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45-12.16) and intensive levels (aOR = 3.27, 95% CI 0.73-14.60). Regarding adequacy of content, women who received inadequate level of care content were associated with higher prevalence of preterm birth (aOR = 3.69, 95% CI 1.60-8.55).
CONCLUSION: The study shows inadequate content is associated with higher prevalence of preterm birth and suggests that inadequate utilization increases the risk of preterm birth. It demonstrates the relevance of using both utilization and content assessment in evaluating quality of ANC. Further studies are encouraged to review the methods used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29590356     DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzy041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care        ISSN: 1353-4505            Impact factor:   2.038


  6 in total

1.  Determinants of Low Birth Weight in Ghana: Does Quality of Antenatal Care Matter?

Authors:  Emmanuel Banchani; Eric Y Tenkorang
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2020-05

2.  Trends and predictors of extreme preterm birth: Western Australian population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Brad M Farrant; Scott W White; Carrington C J Shepherd
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  The impact of antenatal care utilization on admissions to neonatal intensive care units and perinatal mortality in Georgia.

Authors:  Tinatin Manjavidze; Charlotta Rylander; Finn Egil Skjeldestad; Nata Kazakhashvili; Erik Eik Anda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Parity and the risks of adverse birth outcomes: a retrospective study among Chinese.

Authors:  Li Lin; Ciyong Lu; Weiqing Chen; Chunrong Li; Vivian Yawei Guo
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Quality of antenatal care and associated factors among pregnant women attending government hospitals in Sidama Region, Southern Ethiopia.

Authors:  Assefa Philipos Kare; Amelo Bolka Gujo; Nigussie Yohanes Yote
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2021-11-23

Review 6.  Utility of the three-delays model and its potential for supporting a solution-based approach to accessing intrapartum care in low- and middle-income countries. A qualitative evidence synthesis.

Authors:  Valentina Actis Danna; Carol Bedwell; Sabina Wakasiaka; Tina Lavender
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 2.640

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.