Literature DB >> 29589495

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for type 1 sequelae of a fracture of the proximal humerus.

P Raiss1, G Alami2, T Bruckner3, P Magosch4, P Habermeyer4, P Boileau5, G Walch6.   

Abstract

Aims: The aim of this study was to analyze the results of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in patients with type 1 sequelae of a fracture of the proximal humerus in association with rotator cuff deficiency or severe stiffness of the shoulder. Patients and
Methods: A total of 38 patients were included: 28 women and ten men. Their mean age at the time of arthroplasty was 73 years (54 to 91). Before the RSA, 18 patients had been treated with open reduction and internal fixation following a fracture. A total of 22 patients had a rotator cuff tear and 11 had severe stiffness of the shoulder with < 0° of external rotation. The mean follow-up was 4.3 years (1.5 to 10). The Constant score and the range of movement of the shoulder were recorded preoperatively and at final follow-up. Preoperatively, radiographs in two planes were performed, as well as CT or arthro-CT scans; radiographs were also performed at final follow-up.
Results: The mean Constant score improved from 25 points (5 to 47) preoperatively to 57 points (15 to 81) postoperatively. The mean forward elevation of the shoulder increased from 73° (10° to 130°) preoperatively to 117° (15° to 170°) postoperatively. Previous surgery did not influence the outcome. Patients with rotator cuff tears had lower Constant scores than patients without (p = 0.037). Those with preoperative stiffness of the shoulder had lower postoperative external rotation compared with patients without stiffness (p = 0.046). There was no radiographic evidence of loosening. Three complications occurred, leading to revision surgery in two patients. In all, 17 patients rated their result as very good (45%), another 17 as good (45%), two as satisfactory (5%), and two as unsatisfactory (5%). Discussion: RSA is an effective form of treatment for patients with type 1 sequelae of a fracture of the proximal humerus associated with rotator cuff deficiency or stiffness of the shoulder, with high rates of satisfaction. Rotator cuff tears and stiffness of the shoulder had an adverse effect on the clinical outcome. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:318-23.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fracture sequelae; Post-traumatic; Reverse arthroplasty; Reverse shoulder arthroplasty; Shoulder arthroplasty; Shoulder implant; Shoulder replacement

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29589495     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B3.BJJ-2017-0947.R1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  8 in total

Review 1.  Outcomes following arthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Tony Antonios; Nik Bakti; Akshay Phadkhe; Abhinav Gulihar; Bijayendra Singh
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-07-24

2.  Treatment of avascular necrosis of the humeral head - Postoperative results and a proposed modification of the classification.

Authors:  Jonas Schmalzl; Annika Graf; Michael Kimmeyer; Fabian Gilbert; Christian Gerhardt; Lars-Johannes Lehmann
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 2.562

3.  Decreased complication profile and improved clinical outcomes of primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty after 2010: A systematic review.

Authors:  Raphael J Crum; Darren L de Sa; Favian L Su; Bryson P Lesniak; Albert Lin
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2019-06-19

4.  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for fracture sequelae: How the initial fracture treatment influences the outcomes of joint replacement.

Authors:  Fernando Santana; Eduard Alentorn-Geli; Pau Guirro; Carlos Torrens
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 1.511

Review 5.  The modern reverse shoulder arthroplasty and an updated systematic review for each complication: part I.

Authors:  Sarav S Shah; Benjamin T Gaal; Alexander M Roche; Surena Namdari; Brian M Grawe; Macy Lawler; Stewart Dalton; Joseph J King; Joshua Helmkamp; Grant E Garrigues; Thomas W Wright; Bradley S Schoch; Kyle Flik; Randall J Otto; Richard Jones; Andrew Jawa; Peter McCann; Joseph Abboud; Gabe Horneff; Glen Ross; Richard Friedman; Eric T Ricchetti; Douglas Boardman; Robert Z Tashjian; Lawrence V Gulotta
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-09-07

Review 6.  The modern reverse shoulder arthroplasty and an updated systematic review for each complication: part II.

Authors:  Sarav S Shah; Alexander M Roche; Spencer W Sullivan; Benjamin T Gaal; Stewart Dalton; Arjun Sharma; Joseph J King; Brian M Grawe; Surena Namdari; Macy Lawler; Joshua Helmkamp; Grant E Garrigues; Thomas W Wright; Bradley S Schoch; Kyle Flik; Randall J Otto; Richard Jones; Andrew Jawa; Peter McCann; Joseph Abboud; Gabe Horneff; Glen Ross; Richard Friedman; Eric T Ricchetti; Douglas Boardman; Robert Z Tashjian; Lawrence V Gulotta
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-09-10

7.  Complications and Intraoperative Fractures in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Andrea Dolci; Barbara Melis; Marco Verona; Antonio Capone; Giuseppe Marongiu
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2021-12-08

8.  Effect of Different Reduction Intramedullary Nails on Spiral Fracture of Middle and Lower Tibia.

Authors:  Yongxin Shi; Fuqin Li; Weiguo Liang; Jinshi Liu
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 3.161

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.