Literature DB >> 29589258

Toward a real-time system for temporal enhanced ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy.

Shekoofeh Azizi1, Nathan Van Woudenberg2, Samira Sojoudi2, Ming Li3, Sheng Xu3, Emran M Abu Anas4, Pingkun Yan5, Amir Tahmasebi6, Jin Tae Kwak7, Baris Turkbey3, Peter Choyke3, Peter Pinto3, Bradford Wood3, Parvin Mousavi8, Purang Abolmaesumi2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We have previously proposed temporal enhanced ultrasound (TeUS) as a new paradigm for tissue characterization. TeUS is based on analyzing a sequence of ultrasound data with deep learning and has been demonstrated to be successful for detection of cancer in ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. Our aim is to enable the dissemination of this technology to the community for large-scale clinical validation.
METHODS: In this paper, we present a unified software framework demonstrating near-real-time analysis of ultrasound data stream using a deep learning solution. The system integrates ultrasound imaging hardware, visualization and a deep learning back-end to build an accessible, flexible and robust platform. A client-server approach is used in order to run computationally expensive algorithms in parallel. We demonstrate the efficacy of the framework using two applications as case studies. First, we show that prostate cancer detection using near-real-time analysis of RF and B-mode TeUS data and deep learning is feasible. Second, we present real-time segmentation of ultrasound prostate data using an integrated deep learning solution.
RESULTS: The system is evaluated for cancer detection accuracy on ultrasound data obtained from a large clinical study with 255 biopsy cores from 157 subjects. It is further assessed with an independent dataset with 21 biopsy targets from six subjects. In the first study, we achieve area under the curve, sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 0.94, 0.77, 0.94 and 0.92, respectively, for the detection of prostate cancer. In the second study, we achieve an AUC of 0.85.
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that TeUS-guided biopsy can be potentially effective for the detection of prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D slicer; Prostate cancer; Real-time biopsy guidance; Temporal enhanced ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29589258      PMCID: PMC6436916          DOI: 10.1007/s11548-018-1749-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   2.924


  15 in total

1.  Learning to forget: continual prediction with LSTM.

Authors:  F A Gers; J Schmidhuber; F Cummins
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.026

2.  3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network.

Authors:  Andriy Fedorov; Reinhard Beichel; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Julien Finet; Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin; Sonia Pujol; Christian Bauer; Dominique Jennings; Fiona Fennessy; Milan Sonka; John Buatti; Stephen Aylward; James V Miller; Steve Pieper; Ron Kikinis
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 2.546

3.  Detection and grading of prostate cancer using temporal enhanced ultrasound: combining deep neural networks and tissue mimicking simulations.

Authors:  Shekoofeh Azizi; Sharareh Bayat; Pingkun Yan; Amir Tahmasebi; Guy Nir; Jin Tae Kwak; Sheng Xu; Storey Wilson; Kenneth A Iczkowski; M Scott Lucia; Larry Goldenberg; Septimiu E Salcudean; Peter A Pinto; Bradford Wood; Purang Abolmaesumi; Parvin Mousavi
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Computer-aided detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Rafael Llobet; Juan C Pérez-Cortés; Alejandro H Toselli; Alfons Juan
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2006-04-18       Impact factor: 4.046

5.  Upgrading and downgrading of prostate cancer from biopsy to radical prostatectomy: incidence and predictive factors using the modified Gleason grading system and factoring in tertiary grades.

Authors:  Jonathan I Epstein; Zhaoyong Feng; Bruce J Trock; Phillip M Pierorazio
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Critical evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging targeted, transrectal ultrasound guided transperineal fusion biopsy for detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Timur H Kuru; Matthias C Roethke; Jonas Seidenader; Tobias Simpfendörfer; Silvan Boxler; Khalid Alammar; Philip Rieker; Valentin I Popeneciu; Wilfried Roth; Sascha Pahernik; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Markus Hohenfellner; Boris A Hadaschik
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 7.  Transrectal ultrasound imaging and prostate cancer.

Authors:  Tjerk Goossen; Hessel Wijkstra
Journal:  Arch Ital Urol Androl       Date:  2003-03

8.  PLUS: open-source toolkit for ultrasound-guided intervention systems.

Authors:  Andras Lasso; Tamas Heffter; Adam Rankin; Csaba Pinter; Tamas Ungi; Gabor Fichtinger
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study.

Authors:  Hashim U Ahmed; Ahmed El-Shater Bosaily; Louise C Brown; Rhian Gabe; Richard Kaplan; Mahesh K Parmar; Yolanda Collaco-Moraes; Katie Ward; Richard G Hindley; Alex Freeman; Alex P Kirkham; Robert Oldroyd; Chris Parker; Mark Emberton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012.

Authors:  Jelle O Barentsz; Jonathan Richenberg; Richard Clements; Peter Choyke; Sadhna Verma; Geert Villeirs; Olivier Rouviere; Vibeke Logager; Jurgen J Fütterer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  3 in total

1.  Deep Recurrent Neural Networks for Prostate Cancer Detection: Analysis of Temporal Enhanced Ultrasound.

Authors:  Shekoofeh Azizi; Sharareh Bayat; Pingkun Yan; Amir Tahmasebi; Jin Tae Kwak; Sheng Xu; Baris Turkbey; Peter Choyke; Peter Pinto; Bradford Wood; Parvin Mousavi; Purang Abolmaesumi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 2.  A review of artificial intelligence in prostate cancer detection on imaging.

Authors:  Indrani Bhattacharya; Yash S Khandwala; Sulaiman Vesal; Wei Shao; Qianye Yang; Simon J C Soerensen; Richard E Fan; Pejman Ghanouni; Christian A Kunder; James D Brooks; Yipeng Hu; Mirabela Rusu; Geoffrey A Sonn
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2022-10-10

3.  Current status of deep learning applications in abdominal ultrasonography.

Authors:  Kyoung Doo Song
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2020-09-02
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.