| Literature DB >> 29588956 |
Su Liu1, Michael M Quach2, Daniel J Curry3, Monika Ummat2, Elaine Seto2, Nuri F Ince1.
Abstract
Epilepsy associated with cavernous malformation (CM) often requires surgical resection of seizure focus to achieve seizure-free outcome. High-frequency oscillations (HFOs) in intracranial electroencephalogram (EEG) are reported as potential biomarkers of epileptogenic regions, but to our knowledge there are no data on the existence of HFOs in CM-caused epilepsy. Here we report our experience of the identification of the seizure focus in a 3-year-old pediatric patient with intractable epilepsy associated with CM. The electrocorticographic recordings were obtained from a 64-contact grid over 2 days in the epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU). The spatial distribution of HFOs and epileptic spikes were estimated from recording segments right after the electrode placement, during sleep and awake states separately. The HFO distribution showed consistency with the perilesional region; the location of spikes varied over days and did not correlate with the lesion. The HFO spatial distribution was more compact in sleep state and pinpointed the contacts sitting on the CM border. Following the resection of the CM and the hemosiderin ring, the patient became seizure-free. This is the first report describing HFOs in a pediatric patient with intractable epilepsy associated with CM and shows their potential in identifying the seizure focus.Entities:
Keywords: Automatic detection; Cavernous malformation; HFO; Pediatric epilepsy; Seizure onset zone
Year: 2017 PMID: 29588956 PMCID: PMC5719856 DOI: 10.1002/epi4.12056
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Epilepsia Open ISSN: 2470-9239
Figure 1(A) Twenty seconds of ECoG recording in bipolar montage, with seizure onset represented by the red vertical line. Thirty‐two channel pairs are shown. (B) Structural MRI showing the CM in the left frontal operculum. (C) Postoperative CT image reveals the 8 × 8 grid electrode implanted over the CM and surrounding cortex. (D) PET image showing hypometabolism in the CM area. (E) Magnetic source imaging showing spike distribution. (F) A schematic of grid channel orders. Contacts 18‐19, representing Broca's area, are marked in green; contacts 20‐21 and 28‐29, demonstrating the CM location, are marked in gray. Contacts with frequent spike populations were marked in colors, with the arrow representing the direction of spike propagation. Presumed SOZ contacts 27, 34‐36, and 42 are marked in red. (G) 3‐D rendering of the individual brain with electrode model obtained from MRI and CT co‐registration. The white region indicates the CM, which was generated by MRI segmentation.
Figure 2(A) Feature distribution of the three clusters calculated from the first 10 min of recording. C: HFOs, C: spikes, C: irregular waveforms. For C and C, three random sample events are shown with their raw signal, band‐pass‐filtered signal and time‐frequency maps. (B) 3D rendering of the individual MRI with electrode model and spatial distribution maps, with red representing the locations with most of the captured events. The spatial maps were interpolated based on cubic convolution. (C) Spatial distribution of HFOs and spikes in bar plot. Channels are sorted by the event number.