Literature DB >> 29587975

Astigmatic correction by intrastromal astigmatic keratotomy during femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery: Factors in outcomes.

Yong-Soo Byun1, Seonjoo Kim1, Marjorie Z Lazo1, Mi-Hyun Choi1, Min-Ji Kang1, Jee-Hye Lee1, Young-Sik Yoo1, Woong-Joo Whang1, Choun-Ki Joo2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the 6-month outcomes of femtosecond laser astigmatic keratotomy (AK) combined with femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery and identify factors affecting the efficacy of astigmatic correction.
SETTING: Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.
DESIGN: Retrospective case series.
METHODS: Femtosecond laser AK was performed during femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery. The keratometric astigmatism, refractive cylinder, corneal hysteresis (CH), and corneal resistance factor (CRF) were measured preoperatively and postoperatively at 1 week, 2 months, and 6 months. Vector analysis to evaluate the 6-month outcomes of femtosecond laser AK and univariable regression analysis to determine the factors influencing the correction index were performed.
RESULTS: The study enrolled 89 eyes of 89 patients. The stigmatism type, CH, CRF, and absolute angle of error showed significant correlations with the correction index (P = .041, P = .029, P = .044, and P < .001, respectively). There was a significant difference in the correction index and no difference in keratometric astigmatism between with-the-rule (WTR), against-the-rule (ATR), and oblique astigmatism (P = .044). The keratometric astigmatism with ATR and oblique astigmatism (0.66 diopter [D] ± 0.42 [SD] and 0.46 ± 0.27 D, respectively) was significantly lower than the refractive cylinder (0.92 ± 0.56 D and 0.78 ± 0.43 D, respectively) (P < .05); this was not the case for WTR astigmatism.
CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of femtosecond laser AK was affected by the biomechanical properties of the cornea and astigmatism type. Further studies incorporating the individual biomechanical properties of the cornea and total corneal astigmatism in a nomogram are recommended.
Copyright © 2018 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29587975     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.11.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  5 in total

Review 1.  Cataract surgery astigmatism incisional management. Manual relaxing incision versus femtosecond laser-assisted arcuate keratotomy. A systematic review.

Authors:  Timoteo González-Cruces; Antonio Cano-Ortiz; María Carmen Sánchez-González; José-María Sánchez-González
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 3.535

2.  Outcomes of Femtosecond Laser Arcuate Incisions in the Treatment of Low Corneal Astigmatism.

Authors:  Gary Wortz; Preeya K Gupta; Philip Goernert; Caleb Hartley; Brayden Wortz; Jin Chiu; Nikita Jaber
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-08-07

3.  Site of clear corneal incision in cataract surgery and its effects on surgically induced astigmatism.

Authors:  Junjie Piao; Choun-Ki Joo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Repeated Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Astigmatic Keratotomies in Post-Keratoplasty Eyes.

Authors:  Nadav Levinger; Shmuel Levinger; Nir Erdinest; Asaf Achiron; Naomi London; Omer Trivizki; Eliya Levinger; Irina S Barequet
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 4.964

5.  Prediction of corneal astigmatism based on corneal tomography after femtosecond laser arcuate keratotomy using a pix2pix conditional generative adversarial network.

Authors:  Zhe Zhang; Nan Cheng; Yunfang Liu; Junyang Song; Xinhua Liu; Suhua Zhang; Guanghua Zhang
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-09-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.