| Literature DB >> 29587743 |
Seong B Park1, Christy S Steadman1, Atul A Chaudhari2, Shreekumar R Pillai2, Shree R Singh2, Peter L Ryan1,3, Scott T Willard1,4, Jean M Feugang5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Synthesis of silver nano-compounds with enhanced antimicrobial effects is of great interest for the development of new antibacterial agents. Previous studies have reported the antibacterial properties of pegylated silver-coated carbon nanotubes (pSWCNT-Ag) showing less toxicity in human cell lines. However, the mechanism underlining the pSWCNT-Ag as a bactericidal agent remained unfolded. Here we assessed the pSWCNT-Ag effects against foodborne pathogenic bacteria growth and proteome profile changes.Entities:
Keywords: Bacterial growth kinetics; Bioluminescence imaging; Chicken embryo development; Foodborne pathogens; Pegylated silver-coated carbon nanotubes; Proteomics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29587743 PMCID: PMC5870919 DOI: 10.1186/s12951-018-0355-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Nanobiotechnology ISSN: 1477-3155 Impact factor: 10.435
Fig. 1Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern analysis of pSWCNT-Ag and SWCNT-Ag. The upper panel (blue box) shows EDS mapping analysis of SWCNT-Ag (a–c) and pSWCNT-Ag (d–f). Micrographs a, d are merged images of carbon (b, e) and silver (c, f) atoms. The lower panel (green box) represents the XRD patterns depicting the presence of silver atoms (Ag) in both nanocomposites, and polyethylene glycol or PL-PEG 5000-amine (PEG) in pSWCNTs
Fig. 2Effects of SWCNT-Ag and pSWCNT-Ag on bacterial growth. The graphs show optical density measurements (600 nm) of bacteria growth over 48-h exposure to various concentrations of pSWCNT-Ag (a–c) and SWCNT-Ag (d–f). Data are mean ± SD of three independent cultures of E. coli (a, d), S. Typhimurium (b, e) and S. Anatum (c, f)
Fig. 3Real-time bioluminescence imaging of bacteria growth. Bioluminescence emission was imaged (a) and quantified (b) at 0, 12, 24, 36 and 48 h of culture. Bacteria (E. coli, S. Typhimurium and S. Anatum) exposed to SWCNT-Ag or pSWCNT-Ag showed similar patterns. Therefore, a representative culture plate containing bioluminescence-emitting bacteria under pSWCNT-Ag exposure is shown (a). Bioluminescence intensities (radiance) were plotted to generate the corresponding growth curves (b). Data (radiance) are mean ± SD of three independent cultures, with each bacteria strain plated in triplicate (#1, #2, and #3) per culture. The pseudo-color code scaling bar indicates the lowest (blue; 0.166 × 108) to the highest (red; 2.9 × 108) radiance
Fig. 4Bacterial survival after exposure to pSWCNT-Ag and SWCNT-Ag. Colony forming units (CFU/ml) were evaluated from each E. coli (a), S. Typhimurium (b), and S. Anatum (c) harvested after 48 h cultures in the presence of various concentration of pSWCNT-Ag and SWCNT-Ag (0, 25, 31.25, 50, and 62.5 µg/ml). Data are mean ± SD of three independent cultures
Fig. 5Toxicity evaluation of pSWCNT-Ag on developing chicken embryos. Fertilized chicken eggs were inoculated at 12th day of development with either PBS (Control) or pSWCNT-Ag within the allantoid. Eggs were broken at 20th day of development and fetuses were sacrificed for evaluation. Photographs are X-ray images (IVIS XRMS series III) of chicken controls (a) and exposed (b)
Fig. 6Representative two-dimensional electrophoresis gels of control (a) and pSWCNT-Ag-exposed (b) S. Typhimurium. Down- and up-regulated protein spots are shown in (a) and (b), respectively
Fig. 7Comparative analysis of differentially detected protein spot intensities. A total of 19 representative altered or spiked protein spots are shown with negative or positive fold change values, respectively. Quantification of spot intensities were analyzed by PDQuest 2-D software and ratios of spot intensity (exposed/control) are shown in each graph. Data are mean ± SD of three gels derived from three independent bacteria cultures. Differential regulation was called with P < 0.05 (Student’s t test)
Differentially expressed proteins in S. Typhimurium exposed to pSWCNT-Ag
| Spot ID | Protein name | NCBI no. | Abbr. | Func.a | Local.b | MW (kDa)c | p | No. of peptide matched | Protein scoree | Total ion scoref | Protein score CI %g | Total ion CI %h |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Down-regulated | ||||||||||||
| 2506 | Flagellin FliC | gi|446001950 | hag | N | Extracellular | 51.5 | 4.79 | 16 | 930 | 830 | 100 | 100 |
| 3603 | Aspartate ammonia-lyase | gi|445991585 | aspA | E | Cytoplasmic | 52.2 | 5.15 | 17 | 450 | 335 | 100 | 100 |
| 4405 | Outer membrane protein A | gi|487406894 | ompA | M | Outer membrane | 37.4 | 5.6 | 16 | 571 | 449 | 100 | 100 |
| 4508 | Adenylosuccinate synthetase | gi|446450117 | purA | F | Cytoplasmic | 47.3 | 5.31 | 21 | 265 | 116 | 100 | 100 |
| 5503 | arginine deiminase | gi|446332991 | STM4467 | E | Cytoplasmic | 45.5 | 5.47 | 22 | 774 | 586 | 100 | 100 |
| 5401 | Ornithine carbamoyltransferase | gi|446159176 | STM4465 | E | Cytoplasmic | 36.7 | 5.28 | 11 | 585 | 514 | 100 | 100 |
| 5408 | Carbamate kinase | gi|446350896 | STM4466 | E | Cytoplasmic | 33.3 | 5.45 | 13 | 399 | 307 | 100 | 100 |
| 6406 | gi|446316334 | ansB | E | Periplasmic | 36.9 | 5.84 | 13 | 347 | 262 | 100 | 100 | |
| 8003 | Universal stress protein F | gi|447005040 | uspF | J | Unknown | 15.7 | 5.93 | 11 | 406 | 296 | 100 | 100 |
| 9001 | Ethanolamine utilization protein EutM | gi|446309861 | eutM | E | Unknown | 9.8 | 6.06 | 6 | 164 | 110 | 100 | 100 |
| Up-regulated | ||||||||||||
| 2101 | Outer membrane protease | gi|446639417 | ompX | M | Outer membrane | 18.4 | 5.74 | 9 | 500 | 425 | 100 | 100 |
| 2204 | Alkyl hydroperoxide reductase subunit C | gi|445974947 | ahpC | V | Cytoplasmic | 20.7 | 5.03 | 10 | 437 | 354 | 100 | 100 |
| 5303 | Propanediol utilization microcompartment protein PduB | gi|446019642 | pduB | Q | Unknown | 27.9 | 5.21 | 9 | 378 | 318 | 100 | 100 |
| 7105 | DNA starvation/stationary phase protection protein | gi|446022950 | dps | J | Cytoplasmic | 18.7 | 5.73 | 14 | 476 | 336 | 100 | 100 |
| 8401 | Aldehyde dehydrogenase | gi|446075650 | gapA | C | Cytoplasmic | 35.5 | 6.33 | 20 | 572 | 393 | 100 | 100 |
aFunctional classification was performed using COGs (Clusters of Orthologous Groups) functional annotation. C energy production and conversion, E amino acid transport and metabolism, F nucleotide transport and metabolism, J translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis, M cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis, N cell motility, Q secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism, V defense mechanisms
bSubcellular localization was predicted using pSORTb version 3.0
cPredicted molecular weight (MW) and d isoelectric point (pI)
eProtein scores are derived from ion scores as a non-probabilistic basis for the ranking protein hits. Ions score is − 10 log(P), where P is the probability that the observed peptide match is a random event (http://www.matrixscience.com/help/interpretation_help.html)
fTotal ion score is calculated by weighting ion scores for all individual peptides matched to the protein that is associated with this peptide and MS/MS spectrum (http://www.matrixscience.com/help/interpretation_help.html)
gConfidence interval % (CI %) rates the confidence level of the protein score [MS] or ion score [MS/MS]. The CI % is the statistical calculation based on the distribution of the probability that enables to compare the searched data base with the number of submitted mass spectra for the database searches
Fig. 8Interaction network analysis of differentially regulated proteins under pSWCNT-Ag. Four representative networks (a–d P = 0.0198) were predicted using STRING software (http://string-db.org). a glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, b Flagellar assembly pathway, c alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolism, and d Arginine and proline metabolism