| Literature DB >> 29587691 |
Mee Lian Wong1, Alvin Kuo Jing Teo2, Bee Choo Tai2, Alwyn Mao Tong Ng2, Raymond Boon Tar Lim2, Dede Kam Tyng Tham2, Nashwinder Kaur2, Rayner Kay Jin Tan2, Sarath Kros3, Savun Touch4, Maryan Chhit5, Ian Lubek6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Following Cambodia's implementation of the 100% condom use program with enforcement of condom use and STI treatment services for sex workers in 2001, sexually transmitted infection and HIV declined markedly. In 2008, Cambodia implemented a law to ban brothel-based sex work. We reported trends in unprotected vaginal intercourse with sex workers among heterosexual men buying sex before (2003-2008) and after (2009-2012) the brothel ban in Cambodia. We also determined the association of brothel ban with these men's reports of unprotected intercourse with sex workers.Entities:
Keywords: Brothel ban; Heterosexual men buying sex; Serial cross-sectional study (2003–2012); Unprotected vaginal intercourse
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29587691 PMCID: PMC5870923 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-5321-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 3.295
Social-demographic and condom use characteristics of men who buy sex before and after brothel closure
| Variables | Total | Brothel closure | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before | After | ||||||
| n | % | n | % | n | % | ||
| Sociodemographic characteristics | |||||||
| Age (years)a | |||||||
| < 20 | 31 | (3.2) | 20 | (2.6) | 11 | (5.1) | 0.003 |
| 20–29 | 504 | (51.7) | 373 | (49.3) | 131 | (60.1) | |
| 30–39 | 320 | (32.8) | 267 | (35.3) | 53 | (24.3) | |
| ≥ 40 | 120 | (12.3) | 97 | (12.8) | 23 | (10.6) | |
| Median age (years), (range) | 28 (17–65) | 29 (17–65) | 26 (17–57) | ||||
| Education levela | |||||||
| No formal education | 37 | (3.8) | 30 | (4.0) | 7 | (3.2) | 0.605 |
| Primary (1–6 years) | 303 | (31.1) | 240 | (31.8) | 63 | (28.8) | |
| Secondary (7–12 years) | 596 | (61.1) | 454 | (60.1) | 142 | (64.8) | |
| College and university | 39 | (4.0) | 32 | (4.2) | 7 | (3.2) | |
| Marital statusa | |||||||
| Never married | 452 | (46.5) | 335 | (44.3) | 117 | (53.9) | < 0.001 |
| Married | 463 | (47.6) | 379 | (50.1) | 84 | (38.7) | |
| Divorced/separated | 32 | (3.3) | 30 | (4.0) | 2 | (0.9) | |
| Widowed | 26 | (2.7) | 12 | (1.6) | 14 | (6.5) | |
| Income per month (USD)a | |||||||
| < 100 | 503 | (53.0) | 444 | (59.9) | 59 | (28.4) | < 0.001 |
| 100–200 | 302 | (31.8) | 201 | (27.1) | 101 | (48.6) | |
| 201–300 | 80 | (8.4) | 54 | (7.3) | 26 | (12.5) | |
| > 300 | 64 | (6.7) | 42 | (5.7) | 22 | (10.6) | |
| Alcohol consumptiona | |||||||
| No | 52 | (5.3) | 52 | (6.9) | 0 | (0.0) | < 0.001 |
| Current occasional drinker | 775 | (79.5) | 579 | (76.6) | 196 | (89.5) | |
| Regular drinker | 148 | (15.2) | 125 | (16.5) | 23 | (10.5) | |
| Sex workers | |||||||
| Types of sex workersa | |||||||
| Brothel based only | 579 | (70.8) | 470 | (77.1) | 109 | (52.4) | < 0.001 |
| Non-brothel based only | 206 | (25.2) | 110 | (18.0) | 96 | (46.2) | |
| Both brothel and non-brothel based | 33 | (4.0) | 30 | (4.9) | 3 | (1.4) | |
| Condom use with sex workersb | |||||||
| Condom use for vaginal sex in the last 6 months | |||||||
| Yes | 553 | (56.7) | 474 | (62.6) | 79 | (36.1) | < 0.001 |
| No | 423 | (43.3) | 283 | (37.4) | 140 | (63.9) | |
| Condom use for vaginal sex in the last weeka | |||||||
| Yes | 520 | (63.0) | 409 | (66.5) | 111 | (52.9) | < 0.001 |
| No | 305 | (37.0) | 206 | (33.5) | 99 | (47.1) | |
| Who provided condom for the last vaginal sex?a | |||||||
| Sex workersb | 381 | (88.4) | 375 | (90.6) | 6 | (35.3) | < 0.001 |
| Own self | 50 | (11.6) | 39 | (9.4) | 11 | (64.7) | |
USD; United States dollar, STD/HIV; sexually transmitted diseases/human immunodeficiency virus
aExclude missing values
bInclude brothel and non-brothel based sex workers
Fig. 1Percentage of men who patronised brothel and non-brothel-based sex workers in the last three months. Brothel based sex workers: Chi-square test for trend in proportions, p < 0.001. Non-brothel based sex workers: Chi-square test for trend in proportions, p < 0.001. Both brothel and non-brothel based sex workers: Chi-square test for trend in proportions, p < 0.001. Numbers in graph exclude missing values. Overall, less than 4% of all the men between 2003 and 2012 had sex with both brothel and non-brothel based sex workers
Fig. 2Prevalence of unprotected sex with brothel and non-brothel-based sex workers in the last six months. Brothel based sex workers: Chi-square test for trend in proportions, p < 0.001. Non-brothel based sex workers: Chi-square test for trend in proportions, p < 0.001. Numbers in graph exclude missing values
Fig. 3Comparison of prevalence of unprotected sex in the last week between sex workers and clients. Heterosexual men: Chi-square test for trend in proportions, p < 0.001. Sex workers: Chi-square test for trend in proportions, p < 0.001. Comparison between heterosexual men and sex workers engaging in unprotected sex in the last week at 3 time points; 2003 to 2004, 2007 to 2008 and 2011 to 2012: Chi-square, p = 0.118. Numbers in graph exclude missing values
Fig. 4Percentage of brothel and non-brothel-based sex workers who refused unprotected sex with male clients who declined condom use. Brothel based sex workers: Chi-square test for trend in proportions, p < 0.001. Non-brothel based sex workers: Chi-square test for trend in proportions, p < 0.001. Numbers in graph exclude missing values
Fig. 5Mean frequency of intercourse and unprotected intercourse with sex workers in the last week. Mean frequency of intercourse: Modified Poisson regression with robust sandwich variance, p < 0.001. (Adjusted for age, marital status, income per month, alcohol consumption and self-perceived risk of getting STD/HIV from sex workers). Mean frequency of unprotected intercourse with sex workers: Modified Poisson regression with robust sandwich variance, p < 0.001. (Adjusted for age, marital status, income per month, alcohol consumption and self-perceived risk of getting STD/HIV from sex workers). Numbers in graph exclude missing values
Brothel closure, social-demographics characteristics, risk perception, and practice of unprotected sex among men who buy sex
| Variables | Unprotected sex with sex workersc in the last 6 months | Crude PR | 95% CI | Adjusted PR | 95% CI | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Yes | |||||||
| n | n | % | ||||||
| Time period | ||||||||
| Closure of brothels | ||||||||
| Before closure (2003 to 2008) | 757 | 283 | (37.4) | < 0.001 | 1 | 1 | ||
| After closure (2009 to 2012) | 219 | 140 | (63.9) | 1.71 | 1.49–1.96 | 1.65 | 1.40–1.94 | |
| Sociodemographic characteristics | ||||||||
| Age (years)a | ||||||||
| < 20 | 31 | 16 | (51.6) | 0.934‡ | 1 | 1 | ||
| 20–29 | 504 | 216 | (42.9) | 0.83 | 0.58–1.18 | 0.96 | 0.62–1.49 | |
| 30–39 | 320 | 136 | (42.5) | 0.82 | 0.57–1.19 | 1.05 | 0.66–1.67 | |
| ≥ 40 | 120 | 54 | (45.0) | 0.87 | 0.59–1.29 | 1.11 | 0.69–1.81 | |
| Education levela | ||||||||
| No formal education | 37 | 15 | (40.5) | 0.858‡ | 1 | 1 | ||
| Primary (1–6 years) | 303 | 135 | (44.6) | 1.10 | 0.73–1.66 | 1.11 | 0.71–1.74 | |
| Secondary (7–12 years) | 596 | 255 | (42.8) | 1.06 | 0.71–1.58 | 1.05 | 0.68–1.64 | |
| College and university | 39 | 17 | (43.6) | 1.08 | 0.63–1.83 | 1.17 | 0.66–2.06 | |
| Marital statusa | ||||||||
| Never married/single | 452 | 200 | (44.3) | 0.607 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Married/ever marriedb | 521 | 222 | (42.6) | 0.96 | 0.83–1.11 | 0.89 | 0.74–1.07 | |
| Income per month (USD)a | ||||||||
| ≤ 200 | 805 | 360 | (44.7) | 0.004 | 1 | 1 | ||
| > 200 | 144 | 46 | (31.9) | 0.71 | 0.56–0.92 | 0.69 | 0.54–0.88 | |
| Alcohol consumptiona | ||||||||
| No and occasional drinker | 827 | 334 | (40.4) | < 0.001 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Regular drinker | 148 | 88 | (59.5) | 1.47 | 1.26–1.72 | 1.62 | 1.36–1.92 | |
| Risk perceptions | ||||||||
| Own chance of getting STD/HIV from sex workersa,c | ||||||||
| None to low | 438 | 214 | (48.9) | < 0.001 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Moderate to very high | 517 | 190 | (36.8) | 0.75 | 0.65–0.87 | 0.83 | 0.71–0.98 | |
USD; United States dollar, STD/HIV; sexually transmitted diseases/human immunodeficiency virus, PR; prevalence ratio, CI; confidence interval
aExclude missing values
bInclude divorced/separated/widowed
cInclude brothel and non-brothel based sex workers
‡Chi-square test for trend in proportions