| Literature DB >> 29587368 |
Chele N Lathroum1, Linda Shell2, Kathleen Neuville3, Jennifer K Ketzis4.
Abstract
Treatments for Platynosomum fastosum-the liver fluke of cats-have been developed based on fecal egg counts. Post mortem fluke counts are required to understand true efficacy. In this study, two praziquantel treatment regimens were evaluated using post mortem fluke counts: a high-dose treatment (HT) of 20 mg/kg body weight (BW) administered intramuscularly (IM) once a day for three consecutive days and a low-dose treatment (LT) of 5 mg/kg BW administered once (IM) and repeated 14 days later. A continual enrolment study design was used with 16 naturally infected cats randomly allocated in blocks of four to the HT (eight cats) or LT (eight cats) group. Treatment success, defined as absence of live flukes post mortem, was determined 10 days after the last treatment. Pre- and post-treatment fecal egg counts (centrifugation with Sheather's sugar flotation solution) and bile egg counts (obtained via percutaneous ultrasound guided cholecystocentesis) were evaluated as supportive efficacy data. Twelve cats completed the study with two cats withdrawn from each group. Neither treatment was 100% effective. In the HT group, three of six cats had live flukes, albeit low numbers, at post mortem, while all six LT group cats had live flukes. While fecal and bile egg counts were reduced in both group, they were not reflective of the true infection status of the cats post mortem.Entities:
Keywords: Platynosomum fastosum; liver fluke; praziquantel
Year: 2018 PMID: 29587368 PMCID: PMC6024604 DOI: 10.3390/vetsci5020035
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet Sci ISSN: 2306-7381
Figure 1Adult Platynosomum fastosum harvested from the liver of a cat.
Figure 2Platynosomum fastosum egg in (A) bile and (B) sugar flotation solution.
Schedule of events for cats included in the study.
| Study Day | Procedures | |
|---|---|---|
| ≤2 days prior to Study Day 0 | Identified for euthanasia by the Feral Cat Program | |
| Group 1 | Group 2 | |
| Study Day 0 3 | Body weight | Body weight |
| Study Day 1 4 | Praziquantel 20 mg/kg BW | Clinical assessments |
| Study Day 2 | Praziquantel 20 mg/kg BW | - |
| Study Day 7 | Clinical assessments | Fecal examination |
| Study Day 9 | Fecal examination | - |
| Study Day 10 | - | Fecal examination |
| Study Day 12 | Fecal and bile examination | - |
| Study Day 14 | - | Body weight |
| Study Day 15 | - | Clinical assessments |
| Study Day 21 | - | Fecal examination |
| Study Day 24 | - | Fecal and bile examination |
1 Bile was obtained using percutaneous ultrasound guided cholecystocentesis. 2 Bodyweight was obtained during the physical examination or on Study Day 0 prior to treatment. 3 Clinical assessments were performed 30 ± 10 min before and after each treatment and at 3, 8 and 24 h ± 15 min post treatment. 4 General health observations (appetite level, fecal and urine output, attitude) were conducted twice daily on non-treatment days.
Pre- and post-treatment fecal and bile egg counts (FEC; BEC) and calculated reductions.
| Group | Flukes | Fecal Egg Counts (Eggs/g) | Bile Egg Counts (Eggs/10 µL) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Live Flukes | Percent Difference 3,5 | Pre-Treatment | Post-Treatment | Percent Reduction 6 | Pre-Treatment | Post-Treatment | Percent Reduction 6 | |
| GM (AM) 4 (min, max) | 1.5 (7.2) (0, 40) | 99.3 (98.3) | 45.8 (80.2) (7, 165) | 5.5 (32.0) (0, 104) | 88.0 (60) | 10.4 (33) (2.5, 131) | 0.02 (0.5) (0, 1) | 99.8 (98.5) |
| - | ||||||||
| GM (AM) (min, max) | 19.3 (68.2) (6, 347) | 90.4 (84.3) | 70.4 (466.5) (9, 2580) | 2.2 (11.4) (0, 62.5) | 96.9 (97.6) | 5.2 (20.4) (0.8, 68.3) | 1.0 (4.9) (0, 12.5) | 80.8 (76) |
| - | - | - | - | - | - | |||
| GM (AM) | 201.8 (435) (25, 1590) | - | 45.6 (145.9) (4, 843.5) | - | - | - | - | - |
1 HT: high dose praziquantel treatment (20 mg/kg bodyweight for three days administered intramuscularly). 2 LT: low-dose praziquantel treatment (5 mg/kg bodyweight once repeated 14 days later). 3 Fluke reduction calculations are presented as suggestive but not definitive since the untreated cats were not maintained on study. The untreated cats were from the same source as the study cats but euthanized July 2014 to February 2015 vs. January to August 2015. Fecal egg counts were not significantly different from the pretreatment HT and LT counts (Kruskal-Wallis p = 0.962). 4 GM (AM): geometric mean and arithmetic mean; in the case of 0, 1 was added to all numbers and then subtracted after calculation of the GM. 5 Fluke difference: 100 × ((untreated cat group GM (AM) count − HT or LT group GM (AM) count)/untreated cats GM (AM) count). 6 Fecal and bile reduction: 100 × ((individual cat pretreatment − individual cat post treatment)/individual cat pretreatment); The HT and LT groups (all LT cats and IM cats only) were not significantly different in pretreatment fecal and bile egg counts and percent reduction in fecal and bile egg counts (Mann–Whitney, p > 0.05).