| Literature DB >> 29587361 |
Eyob Chukalo Chutulo1,2, Raju Krishna Chalannavar3.
Abstract
Plants are all inhabited by endophytic fungi in the interior of their tissues. The neem tree Azadirachta is an Indian lilac used for various therapeutic purposes in different forms of preparations. This plant hosts different types of endophytic fungi. In some cases, different tissues of a given plant are inhabited by different endophytic fungi which are discussed in this paper. Recently, there have been new reports on endophytic fungi and their bioactive compounds from Azadirachta indica. The biological function of bioactive compounds was discussed in view of their future industrial prospects. There are a number of different research investigations that examine the endophytes isolated and screened for their potential bioactive secondary metabolites from neem, but there is no comprehensive review on neem endophytes and their secondary metabolites to bring all trends from different researchers together. Therefore, in this review, we have discussed the endophytic fungi from the different tissues of neem, in view of the latest understandings of antimicrobial, antioxidant, and pathogenicity target compounds. Importantly, tracing the previous findings would pave the way to forecast the missing link for future work by researchers.Entities:
Keywords: bioactive compounds; biological activities; endophytic fungi; plant tissues
Year: 2018 PMID: 29587361 PMCID: PMC6024304 DOI: 10.3390/jof4020042
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Fungi (Basel) ISSN: 2309-608X
Endophytic fungi from different parts of neem plant.
| Division (Subdivision) | Class | Subclass | Order | Family | Genus (Former Name) | Identified by | Plant Tissue | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ascomycota | Sordariomycetes | Hypocreomycetidae | Hypocreales | Nectriaceae | ITS-5.8S rDNA analysis | R,L,S,B,F | [ | |
| (Pezizomycotina) | Hypocreaceae | LSU, SSU, TEF and RPB2 sequence data | R,L,S,B,F | [ | ||||
| Phylogeny | L,B | [ | ||||||
| Phylogeny and DNA-based identification | R,B,F | [ | ||||||
| Glomerellales | Plectosphaerellaceae | LSU, SSU, TEF and RPB2 sequence data | R | [ | ||||
| Glomerellaceae | ITS-5.8S rDNA analysis | L,F | [ | |||||
| Sordariomycetidae | Sordariales | Chaetomiaceae | ITS-5.8S rDNA analysis | R,L,B | [ | |||
| ITS-5.8S rDNA analysis | F | [ | ||||||
| Chaetospheriales | Chaetosphaeriaceae | ITS | R | [ | ||||
| Xylariomycetidae | Xylariales | Xylariaceae | Phylogenetic analysis; Molecular clock analysis | S | [ | |||
| Amphisphaeriaceae | Phylogenetic analysis; Molecular clock analysis | B,L,S | [ | |||||
| Bartaliniaceae | ITS rDNA analysis | B | [ | |||||
| Diaporthomycetidae | Trichosphaeriales | Trichosphaeriaceae | ITS-5.8S rDNA analysis | R,S,L,B | [ | |||
| Diaporthales | Diaporthaceae | six-gene phylogeny | S,L,B | [ | ||||
| Leotiomycetes | ITS-5.8S rDNA analysis | R | [ | |||||
| Eurotiomycetes | six-gene phylogeny | R,S,L,B,F | [ | |||||
| ITS-5.8S rDNA analysis | R,F | [ | ||||||
| five-gene phylogeny | R,S,L,B | [ | ||||||
| Dothideomycetes | Pleosporales | ITS-5.8S rDNA analysis | R,B,F | [ | ||||
| ITS-5.8S rDNA analysis | R,L,F | [ | ||||||
| ITS-5.8S rDNA analysis | B,F | [ | ||||||
| Phylogenetic analysis | L | [ | ||||||
| Phylogenetic analysis; Molecular clock analysis | B | [ | ||||||
| Capnodiales | Davidiellaceae | ITS-5.8S rDNA analysis | R,L,B,F | [ | ||||
| B | [ | |||||||
| Botryospheriales | Botryosphaeriaceae | ITS-5.8S rDNA analysis | R,F | [ | ||||
| Basidiomycota (Agaricomycotina) | Tremellomycetes | Tremellomycetidae | Filobasidiales | six-gene phylogeny | S | [ | ||
| Zygomycota (Zoopagomycotina) | Zoopagales | Cochlonemataceae | Phylogeny | B | [ | |||
| Mucoraceae | ITS-5.8S rDNA analysis | R | [ |
Note: “R”: root; “L”: Leaf; “B”: Bark; “S”: Stem; “F”: Fruit. The endophytes are isolated from the tissue types.