| Literature DB >> 29584695 |
Bo Sun1, Baopeng Liao2, Mengmeng Li3, Yi Ren4, Qiang Feng5, Dezhen Yang6.
Abstract
In the degradation process, the randomness and multiplicity of variables are difficult to describe by mathematical models. However, they are common in engineering and cannot be neglected, so it is necessary to study this issue in depth. In this paper, the copper bending pipe in seawater piping systems is taken as the analysis object, and the time-variant reliability is calculated by solving the interference of limit strength and maximum stress. We did degradation experiments and tensile experiments on copper material, and obtained the limit strength at each time. In addition, degradation experiments on copper bending pipe were done and the thickness at each time has been obtained, then the response of maximum stress was calculated by simulation. Further, with the help of one kind of Monte Carlo method we propose, the time-variant reliability of copper bending pipe was calculated based on the stochastic degradation process and interference theory. Compared with traditional methods and verified by maintenance records, the results show that the time-variant reliability model based on the stochastic degradation process proposed in this paper has better applicability in the reliability analysis, and it can be more convenient and accurate to predict the replacement cycle of copper bending pipe under seawater-active corrosion.Entities:
Keywords: copper bending pipe; seawater-active corrosion; stochastic degradation process; time-variant reliability
Year: 2018 PMID: 29584695 PMCID: PMC5951353 DOI: 10.3390/ma11040507
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1The structure and flow paths of copper bending pipe.
Experiment description.
| Type | Parameters | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Experiment | Experiment period | 24 months |
| Experiment interval | 3 months | |
| Seawater | Density | 1025 |
| Dynamic viscosity | 0.8937 | |
| Copper material | Density | 8960 |
| Young’s modulus |
| |
| Poisson’s ratio | 0.35 | |
| Loads | Fluid velocity | 3 |
Figure 2The dimensions of experiment sample: (a) the dimension of copper sample; (b) the dimension of copper bending pipe.
Characteristic parameters of limit strength.
| No. |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | 464.3188 | 0.2638 |
| 2 | 6 | 458.8756 | 0.2661 |
| 3 | 9 | 451.8773 | 0.2695 |
| 4 | 12 | 446.1352 | 0.2722 |
| 5 | 15 | 440.3274 | 0.2750 |
| 6 | 18 | 436.2393 | 0.2768 |
| 7 | 21 | 429.5355 | 0.2803 |
| 8 | 24 | 413.1314 | 0.2903 |
Characteristic parameters of thickness.
| No. |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | 2.2976 | 0.0008 |
| 2 | 6 | 2.2872 | 0.0015 |
| 3 | 9 | 2.2827 | 0.0023 |
| 4 | 12 | 2.2763 | 0.0031 |
| 5 | 15 | 2.2748 | 0.0033 |
| 6 | 18 | 2.2653 | 0.0047 |
| 7 | 21 | 2.2569 | 0.0051 |
| 8 | 24 | 2.2513 | 0.0058 |
Figure 3The stress field of copper bending pipe in initial state.
Characteristic parameters of maximum stress.
| No. |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | 2.2976 | 0.0008 |
| 2 | 6 | 2.2872 | 0.0015 |
| 3 | 9 | 2.2827 | 0.0023 |
| 4 | 12 | 2.2763 | 0.0031 |
| 5 | 15 | 2.2748 | 0.0033 |
| 6 | 18 | 2.2653 | 0.0047 |
| 7 | 21 | 2.2569 | 0.0051 |
| 8 | 24 | 2.2513 | 0.0058 |
Figure 4Time-variant reliability curves at different seawater velocities.
Comparison results of the two methods.
| Flow Velocity | Type | Complete Failure | Corresponding Reliability in This Paper |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 m/s | Traditional | 506 months | 0 |
| This paper | 208 months | - | |
| 6 m/s | Traditional | 142 months | 0.9732 |
| This paper | 175 months | - | |
| 9 m/s | Traditional | 45 months | 0.9986 |
| This paper | 121 months | - |
Figure 5The histogram of replacement time.