| Literature DB >> 29584665 |
Congcong Luan1,2, Xinhua Yao3,4, Hongyao Shen5,6, Jianzhong Fu7,8.
Abstract
Condition monitoring in polymer composites and structures based on continuous carbon fibers show overwhelming advantages over other potentially competitive sensing technologies in long-gauge measurements due to their great electromechanical behavior and excellent reinforcement property. Although carbon fibers have been developed as strain- or stress-sensing agents in composite structures through electrical resistance measurements, the electromechanical behavior under flexural loads in terms of different loading positions still lacks adequate research, which is the most common situation in practical applications. This study establishes the relationship between the fractional change in electrical resistance of carbon fibers and the external loads at different loading positions along the fibers' longitudinal direction. An approach for real-time monitoring of flexural loads at different loading positions was presented simultaneously based on this relationship. The effectiveness and feasibility of the approach were verified by experiments on carbon fiber-embedded three-dimensional (3D) printed thermoplastic polymer beam. The error in using the provided approach to monitor the external loads at different loading positions was less than 1.28%. The study fully taps the potential of continuous carbon fibers as long-gauge sensory agents and reinforcement in the 3D-printed polymer structures.Entities:
Keywords: 3D printing; carbon fibers; electrical resistance; load; polymers; self-sensing
Year: 2018 PMID: 29584665 PMCID: PMC5948911 DOI: 10.3390/s18040994
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1A simply supported beam model: (a) the loading scheme and related parameters, (b) the microsegment of the beam before deformation, and (c) the microsegment of the beam after deformation. (Note: the neutral axis of and does not coincide with the geometric center of the specimen due to the large difference in extensional stiffness of carbon fiber tow and the polymer matrix).
Figure 2Illustration of specimen dimensions and fabrication equipment: (a) Dimensions of the specimen (unit: mm); (b) double-nozzle 3D printing system.
Figure 3Configuration of experiments: (a) Schematic diagram for the measurement using Kelvin clips at different loading positions; (b) experimental setup for asymmetric three-point bending tests.
Figure 4Resistance and force versus time at the loading position of 80 mm for three loading cycles.
Figure 5Resistance and force versus time at different loading positions in one loading cycle.
Figure 6Linear fit of the fractional change in resistance versus force at different loading positions.
Sensitivity coefficient K in one loading cycle of the three tested specimens (10−6·N−1).
| Loading Position | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Specimen 1 | 7.41 | 9.22 | 10.30 | 11.10 | 10.90 | 9.21 | 7.04 |
| Specimen 2 | 6.95 | 9.72 | 10.99 | 11.44 | 10.45 | 9.81 | 6.83 |
| Specimen 3 | 6.71 | 9.51 | 10.93 | 11.03 | 10.69 | 9.39 | 6.56 |
| Average | 7.02 ± 0.36 | 9.48 ± 0.25 | 10.74 ± 0.38 | 11.19 ± 0.22 | 10.68 ± 0.23 | 9.47 ± 0.31 | 6.81 ± 0.24 |
Figure 7Determination of strain sensitivity k through the tensile tests.
The main material parameters used in calculation.
| Parameters | PLA Matrix | Carbon Fiber Tow | Epoxy Resin |
|---|---|---|---|
| 65 MPa | 230 GPa | 80 MPa | |
| 95% | 0.029% | 4.971% |
Figure 8Comparison of sensitivity coefficient K between measured values and calculated values.
Figure 9Results of monitoring loads at different positions by electrical resistance measurement.