Literature DB >> 29582687

Dual method use among long-acting reversible contraceptive users.

Caitlin Bernard1, Qiuhong Zhao2, Jeffrey F Peipert1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare rates of dual method use (concurrent use of condoms and an effective method of contraception) in long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) and non-LARC hormonal contraceptive users, and to determine factors associated with dual method use.
METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of the Contraceptive CHOICE Project, an observational, prospective cohort study of 9256 women in St. Louis, MO, USA. Our sample included 6744 women who initiated a contraceptive method within 3 months of enrollment, continued use at 6 months post-enrollment, and responded regarding dual method use. Our primary outcome was the rate of dual method use at 6 months post-enrollment.
RESULTS: Dual method use was reported by 32% of LARC and 45% of non-LARC hormonal contraceptive users (p < .01). After adjusting for other covariates and comparing to non-LARC hormonal contraceptive users, LARC users were less likely to report dual method use (RRadj 0.76, 95% CI 0.70-0.83). Factors associated with dual method use in our multivariable analysis were age <25 years, black race, lower education, single relationship status, baseline dual method use, baseline diagnosis of sexually transmitted infection (STI), greater partner willingness to use a condom, and higher condom self-efficacy score.
CONCLUSIONS: LARC users are less likely to report dual method use compared to non-LARC hormonal contraceptive users, but other factors also impact dual method use. Further studies should be performed to determine whether this lower dual method use increases the risk of STI. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT01986439.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dual method use; LARC; condom use; sexually transmitted infections; unintended pregnancy

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29582687      PMCID: PMC6150759          DOI: 10.1080/13625187.2018.1445850

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care        ISSN: 1362-5187            Impact factor:   1.848


  19 in total

1.  Adolescent condom use and perceptions of risk for sexually transmitted diseases: a prospective study.

Authors:  Jonathan M Ellen; Nancy Adler; Jill E Gurvey; Susan G Millstein; Jeanne Tschann
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.830

2.  Risk perceptions, condom use, and sexually transmitted diseases among adolescent females according to social network position.

Authors:  Julie A Bettinger; Nancy E Adler; Frank C Curriero; Jonathan M Ellen
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.830

3.  Dual method use at last sexual encounter: a nationally representative, episode-level analysis of US men and women.

Authors:  Jenny A Higgins; Nicole K Smith; Stephanie A Sanders; Vanessa Schick; Debby Herbenick; Michael Reece; Brian Dodge; J Dennis Fortenberry
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  Condom use and incident sexually transmitted infection after initiation of long-acting reversible contraception.

Authors:  Colleen P McNicholas; Jessica B Klugman; Qiuhong Zhao; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Sexually Transmitted Infection Prevention With Long-Acting Reversible Contraception: Factors Associated With Dual Use.

Authors:  Erika L Thompson; Cheryl A Vamos; Stacey B Griner; Rachel Logan; Coralia Vázquez-Otero; Ellen M Daley
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.830

6.  Women at risk for sexually transmitted diseases: correlates of intercourse without barrier contraception.

Authors:  Jeffrey F Peipert; Kate L Lapane; Jenifer E Allsworth; Colleen A Redding; Jeffrey L Blume; Faye Lozowski; Michael D Stein
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Changes in Use of Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive Methods Among U.S. Women, 2009-2012.

Authors:  Megan L Kavanaugh; Jenna Jerman; Lawrence B Finer
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Structured contraceptive counseling provided by the Contraceptive CHOICE Project.

Authors:  Tessa Madden; Jennifer L Mullersman; Karen J Omvig; Gina M Secura; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 9.  Are dual-method messages undermining STI/HIV prevention?

Authors:  Ann O'Leary
Journal:  Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-11-15

10.  Understanding the Decline in Adolescent Fertility in the United States, 2007-2012.

Authors:  Laura Lindberg; John Santelli; Sheila Desai
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 5.012

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Long-Acting Reversible Contraception, Condom Use, and Sexually Transmitted Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Riley J Steiner; Sanjana Pampati; Katherine M Kortsmit; Nicole Liddon; Andrea Swartzendruber; Karen Pazol
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 6.604

2.  Fertility intentions and long-acting reversible contraceptive use among HIV-negative single mothers in Zambia.

Authors:  Jessica L Li; William Kilembe; Mubiana Inambao; Bellington Vwalika; Rachel Parker; Tyronza Sharkey; Ana-Maria Visoiu; Lisa B Haddad; Kristin M Wall; Susan Allen
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 3.  Contraceptive use and the risk of sexually transmitted infection: systematic review and current perspectives.

Authors:  Jennifer Deese; Subarna Pradhan; Hannah Goetz; Charles Morrison
Journal:  Open Access J Contracept       Date:  2018-11-12

4.  Provision of family planning vouchers and early initiation of postpartum contraceptive use among women living with HIV in southwestern Uganda: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Esther C Atukunda; Godfrey R Mugyenyi; Celestino Obua; Elly B Atuhumuza; Edward J Lukyamuzi; Angela Kaida; Amon G Agaba; Lynn T Matthews
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 11.069

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.