| Literature DB >> 29582636 |
Fahd Alharbi1,2, Mir Faeq Ali Quadri.
Abstract
Background: Oral cancer is the sixth most common cancer in the world, with a high prevalence reported in Jazan province of Saudi Arabia. The objectives of this study were to check individual and integrated effects of potential risk factors for oral squamous cell carcinoma. Materials and methods: A case control study was designed with a sample of 210 subjects, in which histopathologically confirmed incident cases (n=70) and controls (n=140) matched for age, gender and referral route, were recruited. Differences in exposure to potential risk factors between cases and controls were assessed using chi-square and McNemar analyses. A logistic regression model with interactions was applied to check individual and integrated effects.Entities:
Keywords: Shammah; oral squamous cell carcinoma; oral cancer; case control study; Jazan; Saudi Arabia
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29582636 PMCID: PMC5980857 DOI: 10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.3.791
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian Pac J Cancer Prev ISSN: 1513-7368
Demographic Details and Distribution of Use of Potential Risk Factors among Cases and Controls
| Variables | Cases (n1=70) | Controls (n0=140) | P-Value | $O.R |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | ||||
| < 29 years | 2.8% (2) | 2.8% (4) | 0.3 | |
| 30 – 59 years | 68.5% (48) | 68.5% (96) | N.A | |
| > 60 | 28.5% (20) | 28.5% (40) | ||
| Gender | ||||
| Male | 51.4% (36) | 51.4% (72) | 0.22 | |
| Female | 48.5% (34) | 48.5% (68) | N.A | |
| *Shamma | ||||
| Never users | 17.1% (12) | 90% (126) | 0 | |
| Ever users | 82.8% (58) | 10% (14) | 3.33 | |
| *Khat | ||||
| Never users | 55.7% (39) | 93.5% (131) | 0.02 | |
| Ever users | 44.2% (31) | 6.4% (9) | 1.01 | |
| *Cigarette | ||||
| Never users | 42.8% (30) | 90% (126) | 0.01 | |
| Ever users | 57.1% (40) | 10% (14) | 1.1 | |
| *Sheesha | ||||
| Never users | 18.5% (13) | 88.5% (124) | 0 | |
| Ever users | 81.4% (57) | 11.4% (16) | 2.23 | |
| *Shamma and Khat | ||||
| Combined users | 42.8% (30) | 6.4% (9) | 0.02 | |
| Individual users | 57.1% (40) | 93.5% (131) | 1.7 | |
| *Shamma and Pipe | ||||
| Combined users | 80% (56) | 10% (14) | 0.02 | 1.67 |
| Individual users | 20% (14) | 90% (126) | ||
*Shamma, Khat, Cigarette and Sheesha consumption was significantly different between cases and controls; McNemar analysis $ for Odds ratio (O.R); N.A, Not Applicable.
Individual Effect of the Predictor Variables on OSCC Adjusted for Age, Gender, Area of Residence and Level of Education
| *Explanatory variables | B | $P-Value | Crude Odds Ratio O.R (CI) | Adjusted Odds Ratio O.R (CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shamma | 3.5 | 0 | 67.66 (3.48, 88.79) | 33.01 (3.22, 39.88) |
| Khat | -0.39 | 0 | 1.75 (0.19, 3.44) | 0.67 (0.19, 2.36) |
| Cigarette | 0.53 | 0 | 1.66 (0.17, 33.71) | 1.58 (0.13, 2.50) |
| Sheesha | 1.38 | 0 | 53.16 (0.11, 76.77) | 3.96 (0.24, 63.38) |
*Explanatory variables were dichotomized as “Ever users” and “Never users”; $Chi-square analysis was performed to see the association; B, Beta coefficient ; O.R, Odds ratio; CI, Confidence Interval
Logistic Regression Model Demonstrating Articulated Effect of Various Potential Risk Factors on OSCC
| Predictor variables | $P-Value | *O.R (95% CI) | R2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | 0.4 | ||
| Shamma | 0 | 33.01 (13.01 – 76.31) | |
| Sheesha | 0.03 | 3.96 (2.11 – 28.83) | |
| Model 2 (Integrated) | 0.47 | ||
| Ever Shamma + Ever Sheesha | 0 | 35.03 (11.50 – 65.66) | |
| Ever Sheesha + Ever Cigarette | 0 | 10.52 (1.03 – 33.90) | |
| Ever Shamma + Ever Cigarette | 0.02 | 10.10 (0.50 - 20.40) |
$Chi square analysis with P<0.05 as significant; *Model 2 demonstrating the interaction effect with age, gender, area of living and education level as confounders; O.R, Odds ratio; CI, Confidence Interval.