Literature DB >> 29582556

Implementing the access and waiting time standard for early intervention in psychosis in the United Kingdom: An evaluation of referrals and post-assessment outcomes over the first year of operation.

Vidyah Adamson1, Emma Barrass1, Stephen McConville1, Chantelle Irikok1, Kim Taylor1, Steve Pitt1, Rob Van Duyn1, Susan Bennett1, Lisa Jackson1, Jon Carroll1, Mark Andrews1, Ann Parker1, Caroline Wright1, Katie Greathead1, David Price1.   

Abstract

AIM: Improving timely access to evidence-based treatment for people aged 14-65 years experiencing a first episode psychosis (FEP) or an at-risk mental state (ARMS) for psychosis is a national priority within the United Kingdom. An early intervention in psychosis (EIP) access and waiting time standard has been set which has extended the age range and acceptance criteria for services.
METHODS: This descriptive evaluation reports upon the referrals and access to treatment times within an EIP service over the first year of operating in line with the access and waiting time standard. Patient pathways and post-assessment status are also described.
RESULTS: The service received 406 referrals, of which 88% (n = 357) were assessed. The mean length of time to treatment was 1.5 weeks, with 88% being seen within 2 weeks. Of those who engaged in an assessment, 34% (n = 138) were identified as ARMS cases and 30% (n = 123) were identified as FEP. Over 35 year olds accounted for 22% (n = 80) of the total accepted cases.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate clinical and operational issues, which will need careful consideration in the future planning of services. The high number of ARMS cases highlights the importance of clear treatment pathways and targeted interventions and may suggest a need to commission distinct ARMS services. The number of people who met the extended age and service acceptance criteria may suggest a need to adapt or redesign clinical services to meet the age-specific needs of over 35 year olds and those with an ARMS. It is unclear how changes to the remit of EIP services will impact upon future clinical outcomes.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  access and waiting time standard; at-risk mental state; early intervention in psychosis; first episode psychosis

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29582556     DOI: 10.1111/eip.12548

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Early Interv Psychiatry        ISSN: 1751-7885            Impact factor:   2.732


  7 in total

1.  Psychosis Early Intervention Across the Life Span: A Service Perspective.

Authors:  Kathryn M Taylor; Ela Orucu; Sunil Nandha; Matteo Cella
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2022-08-03

2.  Ethnic variations in duration of untreated psychosis: report from the CRIS-FEP study.

Authors:  Sherifat Oduola; Tom K J Craig; Craig Morgan
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 4.328

3.  Real World Implementation of a Transdiagnostic Risk Calculator for the Automatic Detection of Individuals at Risk of Psychosis in Clinical Routine: Study Protocol.

Authors:  Paolo Fusar-Poli; Dominic Oliver; Giulia Spada; Rashmi Patel; Robert Stewart; Richard Dobson; Philip McGuire
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 4.157

4.  Pan-London Network for Psychosis-Prevention (PNP).

Authors:  Paolo Fusar-Poli; Andrés Estradé; Tom J Spencer; Susham Gupta; Silvia Murguia-Asensio; Savithasri Eranti; Kerry Wilding; Olivier Andlauer; Jonathan Buhagiar; Martin Smith; Sharon Fitzell; Victoria Sear; Adelaide Ademan; Andrea De Micheli; Philip McGuire
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 4.157

Review 5.  Establishing a clinical service to prevent psychosis: What, how and when? Systematic review.

Authors:  Gonzalo Salazar de Pablo; Andrés Estradé; Marcello Cutroni; Olivier Andlauer; Paolo Fusar-Poli
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 6.222

6.  Transdiagnostic Risk Calculator for the Automatic Detection of Individuals at Risk and the Prediction of Psychosis: Second Replication in an Independent National Health Service Trust.

Authors:  Paolo Fusar-Poli; Nomi Werbeloff; Grazia Rutigliano; Dominic Oliver; Cathy Davies; Daniel Stahl; Philip McGuire; David Osborn
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 9.306

7.  Smartphone-delivered self-management for first-episode psychosis: the ARIES feasibility randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Thomas Steare; Puffin O'Hanlon; Michelle Eskinazi; David Osborn; Brynmor Lloyd-Evans; Rebecca Jones; Helen Rostill; Sarah Amani; Sonia Johnson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.