Ivy Goh1, Olive Lai1, Lita Chew2,3. 1. Department of Pharmacy, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Drive, Singapore, 169610, Singapore. 2. Department of Pharmacy, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Drive, Singapore, 169610, Singapore. lita.chew@nccs.com.sg. 3. Department of Pharmacy, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore. lita.chew@nccs.com.sg.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This was a single center, retrospective cross-sectional study looking into the incidence and types of drug-related problems (DRPs) detected among elderly cancer patients receiving at least three long-term medications concurrent with IV chemotherapy, and the types of intervention taken to address these DRPs. This paper serves to elucidate the prevalence and risk of polypharmacy in our geriatric oncology population in an ambulatory care setting, to raise awareness on this growing issue and to encourage more resource allocation to address this healthcare phenomenon. RECENT FINDINGS: DRP was detected in 77.6% of elderly cancer patients receiving at least three long-term medications concurrent with IV chemotherapy, with an average incidence of three DRPs per patient. Approximately half of DRPs were related to long-term medications. Forty percent of DRPs required interventions at the prescriber level. The use of five or more medications was shown to almost double the risk of DRP occurrence (OR 1.862, P = 0.039). Out of the eight predefined categories of DRPs, underprescribing was the most common (26.7%), followed by adverse drug reaction (25.0%) and drug non-adherence (16.2%). Polypharmacy leading to DRPs is a common occurrence in elderly cancer patients receiving outpatient IV chemotherapy. There should be systematic measures in place to identify patients who are at greater risk of inappropriate polypharmacy and DRPs, and hence more frequent drug therapy optimization and monitoring. The identification of DRPs is an important step to circumvent serious drug-related harm. Future healthcare interventions directed at reducing DRPs should aim to assess the clinical and economic impact of such interventions.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This was a single center, retrospective cross-sectional study looking into the incidence and types of drug-related problems (DRPs) detected among elderly cancerpatients receiving at least three long-term medications concurrent with IV chemotherapy, and the types of intervention taken to address these DRPs. This paper serves to elucidate the prevalence and risk of polypharmacy in our geriatric oncology population in an ambulatory care setting, to raise awareness on this growing issue and to encourage more resource allocation to address this healthcare phenomenon. RECENT FINDINGS: DRP was detected in 77.6% of elderly cancerpatients receiving at least three long-term medications concurrent with IV chemotherapy, with an average incidence of three DRPs per patient. Approximately half of DRPs were related to long-term medications. Forty percent of DRPs required interventions at the prescriber level. The use of five or more medications was shown to almost double the risk of DRP occurrence (OR 1.862, P = 0.039). Out of the eight predefined categories of DRPs, underprescribing was the most common (26.7%), followed by adverse drug reaction (25.0%) and drug non-adherence (16.2%). Polypharmacy leading to DRPs is a common occurrence in elderly cancerpatients receiving outpatient IV chemotherapy. There should be systematic measures in place to identify patients who are at greater risk of inappropriate polypharmacy and DRPs, and hence more frequent drug therapy optimization and monitoring. The identification of DRPs is an important step to circumvent serious drug-related harm. Future healthcare interventions directed at reducing DRPs should aim to assess the clinical and economic impact of such interventions.
Authors: Lesly A Dossett; Janella N Hudson; Arden M Morris; M Catherine Lee; Richard G Roetzheim; Michael D Fetters; Gwendolyn P Quinn Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2016-10-11 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Sean Oldak; Stephanie Ioannou; Priyanka Kamath; Marilyn Huang; Sophia George; Brian Slomovitz; Matthew Schlumbrecht Journal: Oncologist Date: 2019-04-05
Authors: F Ranchon; C Rioufol; H Prely; C Herledan; A G Caffin; A Baudouin; V Larbre; M Maire; V Schwiertz; N Vantard Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2021-04-29 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Faisal Shakeel; Jamshaid A Khan; Muhammad Aamir; Peer A Hannan; Sabahat Zehra; Irfan Ullah Journal: Saudi Med J Date: 2018-12 Impact factor: 1.484
Authors: Emelie C Rotbain; Klaus Rostgaard; Michael A Andersen; Caspar Da Cunha-Bang; Carsten U Niemann; Henrik Frederiksen; Henrik Hjalgrim Journal: Clin Epidemiol Date: 2021-12-30 Impact factor: 4.790