Sabina Shaikh1, Jyotsna S Jagai2, Colette Ashley3, Shuhan Zhou3, Robert M Sargis4. 1. Program on Global Environment, Social Science Collegiate Division, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. 2. Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Division, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. 3. Harris School of Public Policy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. 4. Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, 835 S. Wolcott; Suite E625, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA. rsargis@uic.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Diabetes is a burgeoning threat to public health in the USA. Importantly, the burden of diabetes is not equally borne across society with marked disparities based on geography, race/ethnicity, and income. The etiology of global and population-specific diabetes risk remains incompletely understood; however, evidence linking environmental toxicants acting as endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs), such as particulate matter and arsenic, with diabetes suggests that environmental policies could play an important role in diabetes risk reduction. RECENT FINDINGS: Evidence suggests that disproportionate exposures to EDCs may contribute to subgroup-specific diabetes risk; however, no federal policies regulate EDCs linked to diabetes based upon diabetogenic potential. Nevertheless, analyses of European Union data indicate that such regulation could reduce diabetes-associated costs and disease burden. Federal laws only regulate EDCs indirectly. The accumulating evidence linking these chemicals with diabetes risk should encourage policymakers to adopt stricter environmental standards that consider both health and economic impacts.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Diabetes is a burgeoning threat to public health in the USA. Importantly, the burden of diabetes is not equally borne across society with marked disparities based on geography, race/ethnicity, and income. The etiology of global and population-specific diabetes risk remains incompletely understood; however, evidence linking environmental toxicants acting as endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs), such as particulate matter and arsenic, with diabetes suggests that environmental policies could play an important role in diabetes risk reduction. RECENT FINDINGS: Evidence suggests that disproportionate exposures to EDCs may contribute to subgroup-specific diabetes risk; however, no federal policies regulate EDCs linked to diabetes based upon diabetogenic potential. Nevertheless, analyses of European Union data indicate that such regulation could reduce diabetes-associated costs and disease burden. Federal laws only regulate EDCs indirectly. The accumulating evidence linking these chemicals with diabetes risk should encourage policymakers to adopt stricter environmental standards that consider both health and economic impacts.
Authors: Patricia F Coogan; Laura F White; Michael Jerrett; Robert D Brook; Jason G Su; Edmund Seto; Richard Burnett; Julie R Palmer; Lynn Rosenberg Journal: Circulation Date: 2012-01-04 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Teresa To; Jingqin Zhu; Paul J Villeneuve; Jacqueline Simatovic; Laura Feldman; Chenwei Gao; Devon Williams; Hong Chen; Scott Weichenthal; Claus Wall; Anthony B Miller Journal: Environ Int Date: 2015-04-06 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Duk-Hee Lee; Michael W Steffes; Andreas Sjödin; Richard S Jones; Larry L Needham; David R Jacobs Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2010-05-05 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Anna Rignell-Hydbom; Jonas Lidfeldt; Hannu Kiviranta; Panu Rantakokko; Göran Samsioe; Carl-David Agardh; Lars Rylander Journal: PLoS One Date: 2009-10-19 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Mary Turyk; Henry Anderson; Lynda Knobeloch; Pamela Imm; Victoria Persky Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2009-03-06 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Jerrold J Heindel; Sarah Howard; Keren Agay-Shay; Juan P Arrebola; Karine Audouze; Patrick J Babin; Robert Barouki; Amita Bansal; Etienne Blanc; Matthew C Cave; Saurabh Chatterjee; Nicolas Chevalier; Mahua Choudhury; David Collier; Lisa Connolly; Xavier Coumoul; Gabriella Garruti; Michael Gilbertson; Lori A Hoepner; Alison C Holloway; George Howell; Christopher D Kassotis; Mathew K Kay; Min Ji Kim; Dominique Lagadic-Gossmann; Sophie Langouet; Antoine Legrand; Zhuorui Li; Helene Le Mentec; Lars Lind; P Monica Lind; Robert H Lustig; Corinne Martin-Chouly; Vesna Munic Kos; Normand Podechard; Troy A Roepke; Robert M Sargis; Anne Starling; Craig R Tomlinson; Charbel Touma; Jan Vondracek; Frederick Vom Saal; Bruce Blumberg Journal: Biochem Pharmacol Date: 2022-04-05 Impact factor: 6.100
Authors: Paul D Juarez; Mohammad Tabatabai; Robert Burciaga Valdez; Darryl B Hood; Wansoo Im; Charles Mouton; Cynthia Colen; Mohammad Z Al-Hamdan; Patricia Matthews-Juarez; Maureen Y Lichtveld; Daniel Sarpong; Aramandla Ramesh; Michael A Langston; Gary L Rogers; Charles A Phillips; John F Reichard; Macarius M Donneyong; William Blot Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-05-19 Impact factor: 3.390