Ilse Broekaert1, Titus Keller2, Daisy Schulten3, Christoph Hünseler2, Angela Kribs2, Martin Dübbers3. 1. Department of Pediatrics, University Children's Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Strasse 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany. ilse.broekaert@uk-koeln.de. 2. Department of Pediatrics, University Children's Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Strasse 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany. 3. Division of Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Strasse 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Abstract
The aim was to determine if peritoneal drainage (PD) is a suitable treatment for pneumoperitoneum in extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants. A retrospective chart review of 42 ELBW infants with pneumoperitoneum at the University Hospital of Cologne between November 2014 and April 2017 was performed. Forty-two infants with a median birth weight of 645 g (interquartile range (IQR) 550, 806) and a median gestational age of 24.3 weeks (IQR 23.2, 25.6) were treated for pneumoperitoneum. Twenty-six (62%) received PD, and in ten (38%), the drain could be removed without further intervention. Infants in the PD group were of significantly lower birth weight (622g vs. 750 g), age (4.5 vs. 10.0 days), and weight at diagnosis (538 vs. 778 g). The mortality in the PD group was 15% at 90 days of life, but no patient deceased in the primary laparotomy group. CONCLUSION: We suggest PD with close evaluation of drainage and clinical course as an alternative treatment for pneumoperitoneum in ELBW infants allowing bridging the vulnerable first days of life until these infants are in a more stable condition. Despite not reaching statistical significance in our series, PD showed the trend towards higher mortality. What is known: • Pneumoperitoneum is traditionally treated with laparotomy, but placement of peritoneal drainage (PD) is a valuable treatment option. • Previous randomized controlled trials have shown no significant differences in mortality for PD versus laparotomy. What is new: • In our cohort, 38% of the infants with PD could be saved from secondary laparotomy, but in the PD group there was a trend towards higher mortality. • PD allows bridging the vulnerable first days of life until ELBW infants are in a more stable condition for possible laparotomy.
The aim was to determine if peritoneal drainage (PD) is a suitable treatment for pneumoperitoneum in extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants. A retrospective chart review of 42 ELBW infants with pneumoperitoneum at the University Hospital of Cologne between November 2014 and April 2017 was performed. Forty-two infants with a median birth weight of 645 g (interquartile range (IQR) 550, 806) and a median gestational age of 24.3 weeks (IQR 23.2, 25.6) were treated for pneumoperitoneum. Twenty-six (62%) received PD, and in ten (38%), the drain could be removed without further intervention. Infants in the PD group were of significantly lower birth weight (622g vs. 750 g), age (4.5 vs. 10.0 days), and weight at diagnosis (538 vs. 778 g). The mortality in the PD group was 15% at 90 days of life, but no patient deceased in the primary laparotomy group. CONCLUSION: We suggest PD with close evaluation of drainage and clinical course as an alternative treatment for pneumoperitoneum in ELBW infants allowing bridging the vulnerable first days of life until these infants are in a more stable condition. Despite not reaching statistical significance in our series, PD showed the trend towards higher mortality. What is known: • Pneumoperitoneum is traditionally treated with laparotomy, but placement of peritoneal drainage (PD) is a valuable treatment option. • Previous randomized controlled trials have shown no significant differences in mortality for PD versus laparotomy. What is new: • In our cohort, 38% of the infants with PD could be saved from secondary laparotomy, but in the PD group there was a trend towards higher mortality. • PD allows bridging the vulnerable first days of life until ELBW infants are in a more stable condition for possible laparotomy.
Authors: Martin L Blakely; Kevin P Lally; Scott McDonald; Rebeccah L Brown; Douglas C Barnhart; Richard R Ricketts; W Raleigh Thompson; L R Scherer; Michael D Klein; Robert W Letton; Walter J Chwals; Robert J Touloukian; Arlett G Kurkchubasche; Michael A Skinner; R Lawrence Moss; Mary L Hilfiker Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Susan R Hintz; Douglas E Kendrick; Barbara J Stoll; Betty R Vohr; Avroy A Fanaroff; Edward F Donovan; W Kenneth Poole; Martin L Blakely; Linda Wright; Rosemary Higgins Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Martin L Blakely; Jon E Tyson; Kevin P Lally; Scott McDonald; Barbara J Stoll; David K Stevenson; W Kenneth Poole; Alan H Jobe; Linda L Wright; Rosemary D Higgins Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2006-03-20 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: R Wadhawan; W Oh; S R Hintz; M L Blakely; A Das; E F Bell; S Saha; A R Laptook; S Shankaran; B J Stoll; M C Walsh; R D Higgins Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2013-10-17 Impact factor: 2.521