Literature DB >> 29581267

Exploring the structural origins of cryptic sites on proteins.

Dmitri Beglov1, David R Hall2, Amanda E Wakefield1,3, Lingqi Luo4, Karen N Allen3, Dima Kozakov5,6,7, Adrian Whitty8, Sandor Vajda5,3.   

Abstract

Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of proteins reveal the existence of many transient surface pockets; however, the factors determining what small subset of these represent druggable or functionally relevant ligand binding sites, called "cryptic sites," are not understood. Here, we examine multiple X-ray structures for a set of proteins with validated cryptic sites, using the computational hot spot identification tool FTMap. The results show that cryptic sites in ligand-free structures generally have a strong binding energy hot spot very close by. As expected, regions around cryptic sites exhibit above-average flexibility, and close to 50% of the proteins studied here have unbound structures that could accommodate the ligand without clashes. Nevertheless, the strong hot spot neighboring each cryptic site is almost always exploited by the bound ligand, suggesting that binding may frequently involve an induced fit component. We additionally evaluated the structural basis for cryptic site formation, by comparing unbound to bound structures. Cryptic sites are most frequently occluded in the unbound structure by intrusion of loops (22.5%), side chains (19.4%), or in some cases entire helices (5.4%), but motions that create sites that are too open can also eliminate pockets (19.4%). The flexibility of cryptic sites frequently leads to missing side chains or loops (12%) that are particularly evident in low resolution crystal structures. An interesting observation is that cryptic sites formed solely by the movement of side chains, or of backbone segments with fewer than five residues, result only in low affinity binding sites with limited use for drug discovery.

Keywords:  binding hot spot; drug discovery; druggability; protein flexibility; protein–ligand interaction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29581267      PMCID: PMC5899430          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1711490115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  51 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Equilibrium fluctuations of a single folded protein reveal a multitude of potential cryptic allosteric sites.

Authors:  Gregory R Bowman; Phillip L Geissler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  From induced fit to conformational selection: a continuum of binding mechanism controlled by the timescale of conformational transitions.

Authors:  Huan-Xiang Zhou
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Detection of secondary binding sites in proteins using fragment screening.

Authors:  R Frederick Ludlow; Marcel L Verdonk; Harpreet K Saini; Ian J Tickle; Harren Jhoti
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Multiple sequence alignment using ClustalW and ClustalX.

Authors:  Julie D Thompson; Toby J Gibson; Des G Higgins
Journal:  Curr Protoc Bioinformatics       Date:  2002-08

6.  Protein clefts in molecular recognition and function.

Authors:  R A Laskowski; N M Luscombe; M B Swindells; J M Thornton
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  Structural conservation of druggable hot spots in protein-protein interfaces.

Authors:  Dima Kozakov; David R Hall; Gwo-Yu Chuang; Regina Cencic; Ryan Brenke; Laurie E Grove; Dmitri Beglov; Jerry Pelletier; Adrian Whitty; Sandor Vajda
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Where does amantadine bind to the influenza virus M2 proton channel?

Authors:  Dima Kozakov; Gwo-Yu Chuang; Dmitri Beglov; Sandor Vajda
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 13.807

9.  Hot spots and transient pockets: predicting the determinants of small-molecule binding to a protein-protein interface.

Authors:  Alexander Metz; Christopher Pfleger; Hannes Kopitz; Stefania Pfeiffer-Marek; Karl-Heinz Baringhaus; Holger Gohlke
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 4.956

10.  Probing hot spots at protein-ligand binding sites: a fragment-based approach using biophysical methods.

Authors:  Alessio Ciulli; Glyn Williams; Alison G Smith; Tom L Blundell; Chris Abell
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2006-08-10       Impact factor: 7.446

View more
  29 in total

1.  Interaction Energetics and Druggability of the Protein-Protein Interaction between Kelch-like ECH-Associated Protein 1 (KEAP1) and Nuclear Factor Erythroid 2 Like 2 (Nrf2).

Authors:  Mengqi Zhong; Andrew Lynch; Samantha N Muellers; Stefan Jehle; Lingqi Luo; David R Hall; Reina Iwase; James P Carolan; Megan Egbert; Amanda Wakefield; Kristina Streu; Christine M Harvey; Paula C Ortet; Dima Kozakov; Sandor Vajda; Karen N Allen; Adrian Whitty
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 2.  Investigating Cryptic Binding Sites by Molecular Dynamics Simulations.

Authors:  Antonija Kuzmanic; Gregory R Bowman; Jordi Juarez-Jimenez; Julien Michel; Francesco L Gervasio
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 22.384

3.  AlphaSpace 2.0: Representing Concave Biomolecular Surfaces Using β-Clusters.

Authors:  Joseph Katigbak; Haotian Li; David Rooklin; Yingkai Zhang
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 4.956

4.  Structure-Based Analysis of Cryptic-Site Opening.

Authors:  Zhuyezi Sun; Amanda Elizabeth Wakefield; Istvan Kolossvary; Dmitri Beglov; Sandor Vajda
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 5.  Druggable targets in the Rho pathway and their promise for therapeutic control of blood pressure.

Authors:  Rachel A Dee; Kevin D Mangum; Xue Bai; Christopher P Mack; Joan M Taylor
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 12.310

6.  ClusPro LigTBM: Automated Template-based Small Molecule Docking.

Authors:  Andrey Alekseenko; Sergei Kotelnikov; Mikhail Ignatov; Megan Egbert; Yaroslav Kholodov; Sandor Vajda; Dima Kozakov
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Druggable hot spots in trypanothione reductase: novel insights and opportunities for drug discovery revealed by DRUGpy.

Authors:  Olivia Teixeira; Pedro Lacerda; Thamires Quadros Froes; Maria Cristina Nonato; Marcelo Santos Castilho
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 3.686

8.  Identification of Cryptic Binding Sites Using MixMD with Standard and Accelerated Molecular Dynamics.

Authors:  Richard D Smith; Heather A Carlson
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 4.956

9.  Molecular Dynamics Study of Conformational Changes of Tankyrase 2 Binding Subsites upon Ligand Binding.

Authors:  Yoshinori Hirano; Noriaki Okimoto; Shigeo Fujita; Makoto Taiji
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2021-06-29

10.  ChemBead Enabled High-Throughput Cross-Electrophile Coupling Reveals a New Complementary Ligand.

Authors:  Ana L Aguirre; Nathan L Loud; Keywan A Johnson; Daniel J Weix; Ying Wang
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 5.020

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.