Literature DB >> 29581257

Reversal of orbital angular momentum arising from an extreme Doppler shift.

Graham M Gibson1, Ermes Toninelli2, Simon A R Horsley3, Gabriel C Spalding4, Euan Hendry3, David B Phillips2,3, Miles J Padgett2.   

Abstract

The linear Doppler shift is familiar as the rise and fall in pitch of a siren as it passes by. Less well known is the rotational Doppler shift, proportional to the rotation rate between source and receiver, multiplied by the angular momentum carried by the beam. In extreme cases the Doppler shift can be larger than the rest-frame frequency and for a red shift, the observed frequency then becomes "negative." In the linear case, this effect is associated with the time reversal of the received signal, but it can be observed only with supersonic relative motion between the source and receiver. However, the rotational case is different; if the radius of rotation is smaller than the wavelength, then the velocities required to observe negative frequencies are subsonic. Using an acoustic source at [Formula: see text]100 Hz we create a rotational Doppler shift larger than the laboratory-frame frequency. We observe that once the red-shifted wave passes into the "negative frequency" regime, the angular momentum associated with the sound is reversed in sign compared with that of the laboratory frame. These low-velocity laboratory realizations of extreme Doppler shifts have relevance to superoscillatory fields and offer unique opportunities to probe interactions with rotating bodies and aspects of pseudorelativistic frame translation.
Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Doppler; acoustic; negative frequency; orbital angular momentum; time reversal

Year:  2018        PMID: 29581257      PMCID: PMC5899465          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1720776115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


In 1981 Garetz considered the rotational analogue to the well-known Doppler effect (1). Normally discussed in terms of circularly polarized light, this rotational frequency shift is a geometrical effect equivalent to the observation that if placed into a rotating frame, the second hand of a watch appears to revolve at a different frequency. For an electromagnetic wave, this rotational effect arises from the angular momentum of the wave which can be either intrinsic (spin) or extrinsic (orbital) (2–4). In experiments using millimeter-wave sources, an angular velocity of between the rest frame of the source and the observer gave rise to an angular frequency shift of , where and are, respectively, the spin angular momentum (where ) and the orbital angular momentum (OAM) of the photons (5). Here is an unbounded integer characterizing the azimuthally dependent phase of the field , where is the azimuthal coordinate, resulting in such a beam possessing -fold rotational symmetry. This rotational Doppler effect has also been observed in light carrying OAM backscattered from a rotating rough surface, enabling the remote measurement of an object’s rate of rotation (6–8). Waves possessing OAM are not restricted to optical fields and, for example, have been observed acoustically (9, 10). As with the well-known linear case, the rotational Doppler shift can also be observed both optically and acoustically (11, 12). In the acoustic case, the longitudinal nature of the wave means that the angular momentum can be only orbital and hence the frequency shift is simply , where is the ratio between the angular momentum and energy of the wave, and is the frequency of the sound field in the rest frame of the source (13). In the present work we investigate the unusual situation in which the rotational Doppler shift becomes larger than the rest-frame frequency of the source itself. We create an acoustic wave carrying OAM (14, 15) and then observe its Doppler-shifted frequency in a rotating frame: (16). When and are of opposite sign and , the magnitude of the frequency shift is larger than the rest-frame frequency and consequently becomes negative. However, experimentally we measure . Therefore, as the Doppler-shifted frequency becomes increasingly negative, the measured frequency becomes increasingly positive. However, despite being unsigned, the negative frequency still has a physical interpretation: When becomes negative, the OAM observed in the rotating frame undergoes a reversal in handedness (i.e., sign). Furthermore, at yet higher Doppler shifts when , we observe that the measured acoustic Doppler-shifted frequency becomes blue shifted with respect to , regardless of the handedness of the OAM or the sense of rotation. Similar sign reversals have been discussed in the linear case, where a supersonic velocity between a source and an observer results in a temporal reversal of the transmitted signal (17–19). By contrast, we find that in the rotational case, supersonic motion is not required when the transverse motion of the microphone takes place in a superoscillatory region of the acoustic field, i.e., where the lateral distance between phasefronts is less than the acoustic wavelength (20).

Results

Fig. 1 shows a schematic of our experimental setup. A ring of 16 loudspeakers, each of which can be independently phase shifted, was used to create a sound wave carrying OAM at the output of the acoustic waveguides. To probe the sound field in a rotating frame, two microphones were mounted on a rotatable disk and placed in the acoustic field. The two microphones were positioned with a common radius but having a small angular displacement 0.2 rad. This enabled both the OAM magnitude and handedness of the rotationally Doppler-shifted frequencies to be measured.
Fig. 1.

Experimental setup. A ring of 16 loudspeakers (ring diameter 0.47 m) is used to create acoustic fields carrying OAM. A set of tapered acoustic waveguides channels the sound to a smaller-diameter ring (diameter 0.19 m) where the acoustic field is probed by two microphones mounted in a rotating disk. An audio Bluetooth module allows signals to be acquired from the microphones as the disk is rotated [rotation rate is increased in increments of 0.25 Hz up to 55 Hz ( = 345 rad/s)].

Experimental setup. A ring of 16 loudspeakers (ring diameter 0.47 m) is used to create acoustic fields carrying OAM. A set of tapered acoustic waveguides channels the sound to a smaller-diameter ring (diameter 0.19 m) where the acoustic field is probed by two microphones mounted in a rotating disk. An audio Bluetooth module allows signals to be acquired from the microphones as the disk is rotated [rotation rate is increased in increments of 0.25 Hz up to 55 Hz ( = 345 rad/s)]. As an example, a phase delay of rad between each of the 16 adjacent speakers creates an acoustic beam carrying OAM corresponding to  = −4. As we are using a discretized array to shape the acoustic field, we also generate lower-power sidebands centered around the target OAM value, separated in OAM index by , the number of sources (hence the nearest sidebands are located at  = −20 and  = +12 in our case) (21). The rotational Doppler effect can then be observed by tracking peaks in the Fourier spectra of the temporal signals recorded by the rotating microphones. These Doppler-shifted frequencies reveal the OAM spectrum of the acoustic field in the rotating frame (22). Fig. 2 shows a sonogram displaying these Fourier spectra for a range of microphone rotation rates. Fig. 2 shows examples of the Fourier spectrum of the microphones’ temporal responses at particular angular velocities. In Fig. 2 the brightness of the traces represents the modulus of each component of the first microphone’s Fourier spectrum, and the color of the trace encodes the phase difference between the signals recorded by the two microphones. gives further explanation of all of the peaks present in Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.

Experimental observation of OAM handedness reversal in a rotating frame. (A) Sonogram showing the Fourier spectra of the recorded temporal signals for different rotation rates, , of the microphones, where . Here the measured acoustic frequency . The brightness of the features represents the modulus of the spectral components of the signal recorded by the first microphone, and the color represents the phase difference, , between the signals from both microphones. At low frequencies we observe a reduction in amplitude (brightness) due to a roll-off in the microphones’ frequency response. (B) The amplitude of individual Fourier spectra from the key points i–iii indicated on the sonogram. In this experiment the fundamental acoustic frequency was = 565 rad/s (i.e., 90 Hz).

Experimental observation of OAM handedness reversal in a rotating frame. (A) Sonogram showing the Fourier spectra of the recorded temporal signals for different rotation rates, , of the microphones, where . Here the measured acoustic frequency . The brightness of the features represents the modulus of the spectral components of the signal recorded by the first microphone, and the color represents the phase difference, , between the signals from both microphones. At low frequencies we observe a reduction in amplitude (brightness) due to a roll-off in the microphones’ frequency response. (B) The amplitude of individual Fourier spectra from the key points i–iii indicated on the sonogram. In this experiment the fundamental acoustic frequency was = 565 rad/s (i.e., 90 Hz). Initially the rotatable disk is static, and we observe only a single peak in the Fourier spectra at the fundamental acoustic frequency . Upon rotating the microphones, we observe this fundamental acoustic frequency separates into a number of different peaks, indicating that the measured signal is now formed from a range of different frequency components. Each of these components corresponds to a rotational Doppler shift associated with a specific value of OAM present in the structured acoustic field. As we have directed the majority of the power into the  = −4 mode, this is the brightest component visible in Fig. 2. We rotate the microphones in the same sense as the OAM carried by the  = −4 mode and therefore initially observe the  = −4 mode undergo a red shift (i.e., to a lower frequency). In addition to the sidebands due to the discretization of the source array, we also observe other peaks in Fig. 2, centered around  = 0. These peaks correspond to rotational Doppler shifts of additional lower-power components in the OAM decomposition of the field. These additional components arise due to residual misalignments between the axis of rotation of the microphones and the axis of the speaker ring, as well as any other imperfections in the speaker arrangement. As the two microphones are rotated the Fourier transforms of their measured signals exhibit frequency-dependent phase differences . These phase differences are due to the signal recorded by the second microphone lagging behind that recorded by the first one. Given that the microphones are closely spaced, these phase differences are proportional to the OAM value: . Therefore, plotting the phase differences between the two microphones as a function of frequency reveals the OAM of the field associated with each modal component, as shown in the color key in Fig. 2. At a microphone rotation rate of  = 141 rad/s ( = 22.5 Hz), the measured frequency of the  = −4 component falls to zero, since at this rotation rate, the rotational Doppler shift is exactly equal in magnitude to the fundamental acoustic frequency  = 565 rad/s ( = 90 Hz). As the angular velocity of the microphones is further increased, 141 rad/s, this modal component now rises in frequency, but the mode itself is observed to have a reversed OAM and has switched from  = −4  = +4. Finally, when 282 rad/s (45 Hz), we observe that the −4 +4 component is blue shifted with respect to the laboratory-frame acoustic frequency . At this combination of rotation rate and OAM, a blue shift occurs irrespective of the handedness of the OAM or the sense of rotation of the microphone.

Discussion and Conclusions

There are some intriguing contrasts between the emergence of Doppler inversion phenomena in the linear case and that in the rotational case. The linear Doppler-shifted frequency is given bywhere is the speed of sound in the propagation medium, is the rest-frame acoustic frequency, and and are the velocities of the receiver and source, respectively. In Eq. , becomes negative only when the relative speed between the source and the observer is supersonic. When such a negative frequency occurs with the linear Doppler effect, its physical meaning is a time reversal of the received signal. This phenomenon famously led Lord Rayleigh to observe that if a source moves toward a static listener at a rate of , a piece of music being transmitted by that source would be heard reversed in time by the listener, while still retaining the correct tempo and pitch (17). In contrast to the linear Doppler shift, the onset of a negative frequency in the rotational Doppler shift does not exhibit a time reversal. This is because there is no relative motion along the axis between the source and the receiver, and so no mechanism exists by which the propagating waves can be time reversed. Instead, as discussed above and shown in Fig. 2, in the rotational case such a negative frequency is associated with an azimuthal mode inversion: The handedness (i.e., sign) of the OAM is reversed. This handedness reversal can occur even with a subsonic transverse microphone velocity (): The radius of the trajectory followed by the microphones in our experiment was = 95 mm. This means we are probing a superoscillatory region of the field (i.e., a region where the transverse phase gradient is greater than that of a plane wave) (20). This can be understood by considering that there is a critical radius of the circular orbit, , above which the microphones’ transverse velocity is supersonic:The rotation rate at which we observe the OAM inversion in our experiment is 22.5 Hz ( 141 rad/s). At this rotation rate, the radius of the circle above which the microphones’ transverse velocity would be supersonic is = 2.4 m. However, in our experiment, the transverse velocity () of the microphones positioned at = 95 mm is far below the speed of sound: 0.04c. As described above, to achieve , we require that and are of opposite sign and . Therefore, substituting for in Eq. yieldsEq. describes the radius of a circle with a circumference equal to . We can see that the magnitude of is of the same order and shares the same scaling with , as the diffraction limit of a tightly focused acoustic beam (). This comparison of radii highlights how the relative rotation rate between the source and receiver is intimately linked to the diffraction limit when considering OAM reversal phenomena in the rotational Doppler effect. The unusual effects observed here in the acoustic regime are a rather general feature of wave physics and have implications for the interaction of light with ultrafast rotating systems. In particular, Eq. shows that an OAM handedness reversal may potentially be observable at optical frequencies for subwavelength-scale objects rotating with nonrelativistic transverse velocities. For example, Korech et al. (23) measured the rotational Doppler shift due to rotating nitrogen and deuterium molecules, finding a Doppler shift in the terahertz range, six orders of magnitude greater than previously measured in mechanically rotating birefringent crystals (24, 25). In the future, similar experiments with lower-frequency sources or hotter molecular gases could potentially access the regime where an extreme Doppler shift results in the apparent OAM handedness changing sign. We therefore anticipate that the effects that we predict may soon need to be taken into account at optical frequencies. Furthermore, Doppler inversion also has implications for rotation detection: refs. 6 and 8 showed that waves carrying OAM reflected from a spinning body encode information about the body’s rotation rate. By measuring the rotational Doppler shift of these reflected waves, the rotation rate of the object can be measured via the relation . Our work highlights that the measurement of the Doppler shift, , of a wave carrying a single value of OAM () gives rise to an ambiguity in the detected rotation rate; i.e., even if the rotation direction is known, we cannot distinguish between and . To lift this degeneracy, we must measure the Doppler shift imparted to waves carrying at least two different values of OAM. Finally we note that negative frequencies due to large Doppler shifts have been considered in several other systems, including in hydrodynamic (26, 27) and optical (28) regimes. The interest in the emergence of negative-frequency waves in these contexts is related to predictions in quantum field theory and the amplification of incident waves, creating a link with Hawking radiation (27) or Penrose superradiance (29, 30) and the Zel’dovich effect (31, 32) in the case of rotation. In this work we have shown that negative frequencies are readily accessible acoustically, which may provide opportunities to investigate these exotic effects. In summary, we have demonstrated that a negative rotationally Doppler-shifted frequency gives rise to a reversal in the handedness of the angular momentum carried by the wave. This is the rotational analogue to the time reversal observed upon the onset of negative frequency in the linear case. We emphasize that this is a nonrelativistic effect, which, in contrast to the linear case, can occur even when the associated transverse velocities are well below the velocity of the wave. This effect could lead to an ambiguity in the detected rotation rate of a spinning object and in the future may be of relevance to the interpretation of rotational molecular spectra and the frequency spectra from opto-mechanical systems undergoing ultrafast rotation. The raw data for this article can be found in an open-access repository at dx.doi.org/10.5525/gla.researchdata.577.
  14 in total

1.  Transfer of angular momentum to matter from acoustical vortices in free space.

Authors:  Karen Volke-Sepúlveda; Arturo O Santillán; Ricardo R Boullosa
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 9.161

2.  Superoscillation in speckle patterns.

Authors:  Mark R Dennis; Alasdair C Hamilton; Johannes Courtial
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 3.776

3.  Detection of a spinning object using light's orbital angular momentum.

Authors:  Martin P J Lavery; Fiona C Speirits; Stephen M Barnett; Miles J Padgett
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Orbital angular momentum of light and the transformation of Laguerre-Gaussian laser modes.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev A       Date:  1992-06-01       Impact factor: 3.140

5.  Nonlinear Zel'dovich Effect: Parametric Amplification from Medium Rotation.

Authors:  Daniele Faccio; Ewan M Wright
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 9.161

6.  Negative-frequency resonant radiation.

Authors:  E Rubino; J McLenaghan; S C Kehr; F Belgiorno; D Townsend; S Rohr; C E Kuklewicz; U Leonhardt; F König; D Faccio
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 9.161

7.  Acoustic rotational manipulation using orbital angular momentum transfer.

Authors:  Andreas Anhäuser; Régis Wunenburger; Etienne Brasselet
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 9.161

8.  Laser-induced rotation and cooling of a trapped microgyroscope in vacuum.

Authors:  Yoshihiko Arita; Michael Mazilu; Kishan Dholakia
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Experimental detection of transverse particle movement with structured light.

Authors:  Carmelo Rosales-Guzmán; Nathaniel Hermosa; Aniceto Belmonte; Juan P Torres
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Holographic acoustic elements for manipulation of levitated objects.

Authors:  Asier Marzo; Sue Ann Seah; Bruce W Drinkwater; Deepak Ranjan Sahoo; Benjamin Long; Sriram Subramanian
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  3 in total

1.  A compact acoustic spanner to rotate macroscopic objects.

Authors:  Ermes Toninelli; Mitchell A Cox; Graham M Gibson; Stuart D Brown; Matthew P Edgar; Andrew Forbes; Miles J Padgett
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Remote Measurement of the Angular Velocity Vector Based on Vectorial Doppler Effect Using Air-Core Optical Fiber.

Authors:  Zhenyu Wan; Yize Liang; Xi Zhang; Ziyi Tang; Liang Fang; Zelin Ma; Siddharth Ramachandran; Jian Wang
Journal:  Research (Wash D C)       Date:  2022-09-02

3.  Vectorial Doppler metrology.

Authors:  Liang Fang; Zhenyu Wan; Andrew Forbes; Jian Wang
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 14.919

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.