Literature DB >> 29581060

Performance-monitoring integrated reweighting model of perceptual learning.

Grigorios Sotiropoulos1, Aaron R Seitz2, Peggy Seriès3.   

Abstract

Perceptual learning (PL) has been traditionally thought of as highly specific to stimulus properties, task and retinotopic position. This view is being progressively challenged, with accumulating evidence that learning can generalize (transfer) across various parameters under certain conditions. For example, retinotopic specificity can be diminished when the proportion of easy to hard trials is high, such as when multiple short staircases, instead of a single long one, are used during training. To date, there is a paucity of mechanistic explanations of what conditions affect transfer of learning. Here we present a model based on the popular Integrated Reweighting Theory model of PL but departing from its one-layer architecture by including a novel key feature: dynamic weighting of retinotopic-location-specific vs location-independent representations based on internal performance estimates of these representations. This dynamic weighting is closely related to gating in a mixture-of-experts architecture. Our dynamic performance-monitoring model (DPMM) unifies a variety of psychophysical data on transfer of PL, such as the short-vs-long staircase effect, as well as several findings from the double-training literature. Furthermore, the DPMM makes testable predictions and ultimately helps understand the mechanisms of generalization of PL, with potential applications to vision rehabilitation and enhancement. Crown
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computational; Double training; Mixture-of-experts; Model; Perceptual learning; Specificity; Transfer

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29581060      PMCID: PMC6200663          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2018.01.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  40 in total

1.  Practising orientation identification improves orientation coding in V1 neurons.

Authors:  A Schoups; R Vogels; N Qian; G Orban
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-08-02       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Rule-based learning explains visual perceptual learning and its specificity and transfer.

Authors:  Jun-Yun Zhang; Gong-Liang Zhang; Lu-Qi Xiao; Stanley A Klein; Dennis M Levi; Cong Yu
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  The dynamics of perceptual learning: an incremental reweighting model.

Authors:  Alexander A Petrov; Barbara Anne Dosher; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Fast perceptual learning in visual hyperacuity.

Authors:  T Poggio; M Fahle; S Edelman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-05-15       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Prolonged training at threshold promotes robust retinotopic specificity in perceptual learning.

Authors:  Shao-Chin Hung; Aaron R Seitz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Task relevancy and demand modulate double-training enabled transfer of perceptual learning.

Authors:  Rui Wang; Jun-Yun Zhang; Stanley A Klein; Dennis M Levi; Cong Yu
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Perceptual learning in visual hyperacuity: A reweighting model.

Authors:  Grigorios Sotiropoulos; Aaron R Seitz; Peggy Seriès
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  No transfer of perceptual learning between similar stimuli in the same retinal position.

Authors:  M Fahle; M Morgan
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1996-03-01       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Task precision at transfer determines specificity of perceptual learning.

Authors:  Pamela E Jeter; Barbara Anne Dosher; Alexander Petrov; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Perceptual learning in the absence of task or stimulus specificity.

Authors:  Ben S Webb; Neil W Roach; Paul V McGraw
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-12-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Roving: The causes of interference and re-enabled learning in multi-task visual training.

Authors:  Barbara Anne Dosher; Jiajuan Liu; Wilson Chu; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 2.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.