Literature DB >> 29580972

Making reliable negative predictions of human skin sensitisation using an in silico fragmentation approach.

Martyn L Chilton1, Donna S Macmillan2, Thomas Steger-Hartmann3, Jedd Hillegass4, Phillip Bellion5, Anna Vuorinen5, Sylvain Etter6, Benjamin P C Smith7, Angela White8, Paul Sterchele9, Ann De Smedt10, Milica Glogovac11, Susanne Glowienke11, Devin O'Brien12, Rahul Parakhia12.   

Abstract

A previously published fragmentation method for making reliable negative in silico predictions has been applied to the problem of predicting skin sensitisation in humans, making use of a dataset of over 2750 chemicals with publicly available skin sensitisation data from 18 in vivo assays. An assay hierarchy was designed to enable the classification of chemicals within this dataset as either sensitisers or non-sensitisers where data from more than one in vivo test was available. The negative prediction approach was validated internally, using a 5-fold cross-validation, and externally, against a proprietary dataset of approximately 1000 chemicals with in vivo reference data shared by members of the pharmaceutical, nutritional, and personal care industries. The negative predictivity for this proprietary dataset was high in all cases (>75%), and the model was also able to identify structural features that resulted in a lower accuracy or a higher uncertainty in the negative prediction, termed misclassified and unclassified features respectively. These features could serve as an aid for further expert assessment of the negative in silico prediction.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  (Q)SAR; Derek Nexus; Expert assessment; Expert knowledge-based system; Negative predictions; Skin sensitisation; in silico toxicology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29580972     DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.03.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0273-2300            Impact factor:   3.271


  4 in total

1.  Use of Lhasa Limited Products for the In Silico Prediction of Drug Toxicity.

Authors:  David J Ponting; Michael J Burns; Robert S Foster; Rachel Hemingway; Grace Kocks; Donna S MacMillan; Andrew L Shannon-Little; Rachael E Tennant; Jessica R Tidmarsh; David J Yeo
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

2.  An Evaluation of the Occupational Health Hazards of Peptide Couplers.

Authors:  Jessica C Graham; Alejandra Trejo-Martin; Martyn L Chilton; Jakub Kostal; Joel Bercu; Gregory L Beutner; Uma S Bruen; David G Dolan; Stephen Gomez; Jedd Hillegass; John Nicolette; Matthew Schmitz
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 3.973

3.  Skin Doctor: Machine Learning Models for Skin Sensitization Prediction that Provide Estimates and Indicators of Prediction Reliability.

Authors:  Anke Wilm; Conrad Stork; Christoph Bauer; Andreas Schepky; Jochen Kühnl; Johannes Kirchmair
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-09-28       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 4.  Standardisation and international adoption of defined approaches for skin sensitisation.

Authors:  Silvia Casati; David Asturiol; Patience Browne; Nicole Kleinstreuer; Michèle Régimbald-Krnel; Pierre Therriault
Journal:  Front Toxicol       Date:  2022-08-11
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.