Aline S C Belela-Anacleto1, Denise M Kusahara2, Maria Angélica S Peterlini3, Mavilde L G Pedreira4. 1. Pediatric Nursing Department, Paulista Nursing School, Federal University of São Paulo, Napoleão de Barros Street, 754. Vila Clementino, São Paulo, 04024-002, Office 113, Brazil. Electronic address: aline.belela@unifesp.br. 2. Pediatric Nursing Department, Paulista Nursing School, Federal University of São Paulo, Napoleão de Barros Street, 754. Vila Clementino, São Paulo, 04024-002, Office 113, Brazil. Electronic address: dkusahara@unifesp.br. 3. Pediatric Nursing Department, Paulista Nursing School, Federal University of São Paulo, Napoleão de Barros Street, 754. Vila Clementino, São Paulo, 04024-002, Office 113, Brazil. Electronic address: maria.angelica@unifesp.br. 4. Pediatric Nursing Department, Paulista Nursing School, Federal University of São Paulo, Napoleão de Barros Street, 754. Vila Clementino, São Paulo, 04024-002, Office 113, Brazil. Electronic address: mpedreira@unifesp.br.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hand hygiene is considered the single most effective means of reducing healthcare-associated infections, but improving and sustaining hand hygiene compliance remains a great challenge. OBJECTIVES: To compare hand hygiene compliance before and after interventions to promote adherence in a paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and to identify predictors of intention to perform the behaviour "hand hygiene during patient care in the PICU". METHODS: A before and after study was conducted in three phases. Based on the World Health Organization guideline for hand hygiene compliance monitoring, 1261 hand hygiene opportunities were directly observed during routine patient care by two observers simultaneously, in a nine-bed PICU in Brazil, before and after infrastructure and educational interventions. To identify predictors of healthcare professionals' intention to perform the behaviour hand hygiene during patient care, a data collection instrument was designed based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Statistical analyses were undertaken using Chi-square test or the Fisher's exact test and regression analysis. A significance level of 5% (p < 0.05) was applied to all analyses. RESULTS: The hand hygiene compliance rate increased significantly from 27.3% in the "pre-intervention phase" to 33.1% in "phase 1-post-intervention," to 37.0% in "phase 2-post-intervention" (p = .010). Perceived social pressure (p = .026) was a determinant factor of intention to perform the behaviour. CONCLUSIONS: Hand hygiene compliance raised significantly after infrastructure, educational, and performance feedback interventions. However, despite the significant effect of the implemented interventions, the overall hand hygiene compliance rate was low. Perceived social pressure characterised a determinant factor of intention to perform the behaviour "hand hygiene during patient care in the PICU", reinforcing the need for behaviour determinants analysis when designing promotional interventions.
BACKGROUND: Hand hygiene is considered the single most effective means of reducing healthcare-associated infections, but improving and sustaining hand hygiene compliance remains a great challenge. OBJECTIVES: To compare hand hygiene compliance before and after interventions to promote adherence in a paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and to identify predictors of intention to perform the behaviour "hand hygiene during patient care in the PICU". METHODS: A before and after study was conducted in three phases. Based on the World Health Organization guideline for hand hygiene compliance monitoring, 1261 hand hygiene opportunities were directly observed during routine patient care by two observers simultaneously, in a nine-bed PICU in Brazil, before and after infrastructure and educational interventions. To identify predictors of healthcare professionals' intention to perform the behaviour hand hygiene during patient care, a data collection instrument was designed based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Statistical analyses were undertaken using Chi-square test or the Fisher's exact test and regression analysis. A significance level of 5% (p < 0.05) was applied to all analyses. RESULTS: The hand hygiene compliance rate increased significantly from 27.3% in the "pre-intervention phase" to 33.1% in "phase 1-post-intervention," to 37.0% in "phase 2-post-intervention" (p = .010). Perceived social pressure (p = .026) was a determinant factor of intention to perform the behaviour. CONCLUSIONS: Hand hygiene compliance raised significantly after infrastructure, educational, and performance feedback interventions. However, despite the significant effect of the implemented interventions, the overall hand hygiene compliance rate was low. Perceived social pressure characterised a determinant factor of intention to perform the behaviour "hand hygiene during patient care in the PICU", reinforcing the need for behaviour determinants analysis when designing promotional interventions.
Authors: Giorgia Gon; Sandra Virgo; Mícheál de Barra; Said M Ali; Oona M Campbell; Wendy J Graham; Stephen Nash; Susannah L Woodd; Marijn de Bruin Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-02-24 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Ben D Albert; Chonel Petti; Adrianna Caraglia; Margaret Geller; Robin Horak; Megan Barrett; Ryan Hastings; Mary O'Brien; Jennifer Ormsby; Thomas J Sandora; Monica E Kleinman; Gregory P Priebe; Nilesh M Mehta Journal: Pediatr Qual Saf Date: 2019-11-06