Literature DB >> 29580304

Impact of Discontinuing Contact Precautions for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis.

Gonzalo Bearman1, Salma Abbas1, Nadia Masroor2, Kakotan Sanogo2, Ginger Vanhoozer2, Kaila Cooper2, Michelle Doll1, Michael P Stevens1, Michael B Edmond3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVETo investigate the impact of discontinuing contact precautions among patients infected or colonized with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) or vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) on rates of healthcare-associated infection (HAI).
DESIGN: Single-center, quasi-experimental study conducted between 2011 and 2016.METHODSWe employed an interrupted time series design to evaluate the impact of 7 horizontal infection prevention interventions across intensive care units (ICUs) and hospital wards at an 865-bed urban, academic medical center. These interventions included (1) implementation of a urinary catheter bundle in January 2011, (2) chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) perineal care outside ICUs in June 2011, (3) hospital-wide CHG bathing outside of ICUs in March 2012, (4) discontinuation of contact precautions in April 2013 for MRSA and VRE, (5) assessments and feedback with bare below the elbows (BBE) and contact precautions in August 2014, (6) implementation of an ultraviolet-C disinfection robot in March 2015, and (7) 72-hour automatic urinary catheter discontinuation orders in March 2016. Segmented regression modeling was performed to assess the changes in the infection rates attributable to the interventions.RESULTSThe rate of HAI declined throughout the study period. Infection rates for MRSA and VRE decreased by 1.31 (P=.76) and 6.25 (P=.21) per 100,000 patient days, respectively, and the infection rate decreased by 2.44 per 10,000 patient days (P=.23) for device-associated HAI following discontinuation of contact precautions.CONCLUSIONThe discontinuation of contact precautions for patients infected or colonized with MRSA or VRE, when combined with horizontal infection prevention measures was not associated with an increased incidence of MRSA and VRE device-associated infections. This approach may represent a safe and cost-effective strategy for managing these patients.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2018;39:676-682.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29580304     DOI: 10.1017/ice.2018.57

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol        ISSN: 0899-823X            Impact factor:   3.254


  14 in total

Review 1.  Hospital Infection Prevention: How Much Can We Prevent and How Hard Should We Try?

Authors:  Gonzalo Bearman; Michelle Doll; Kaila Cooper; Michael P Stevens
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2019-02-02       Impact factor: 3.725

Review 2.  Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE): a reason to isolate?

Authors:  Maria J G T Vehreschild; Miriam Haverkamp; Lena M Biehl; Sebastian Lemmen; Gerd Fätkenheuer
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 3.553

3.  Finding the Value in Personal Protective Equipment for Hospitalized Patients During a Pandemic and Beyond.

Authors:  Rebecca Steuart; Felicia Scaggs Huang; Joshua K Schaffzin; Joanna Thomson
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 2.960

4.  Comparison of surveillance and clinical cultures to measure the impact of infection control interventions on the incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus in the hospital.

Authors:  Surbhi Leekha; Lyndsay M O'Hara; Alyssa Sbarra; Shanshan Li; Anthony D Harris
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.254

Review 5.  Barrier Precautions in the Era of Multidrug Pathogens.

Authors:  Rachel Pryor; Carli Viola-Luqa; Olivia Hess; Gonzalo Bearman
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Infect Dis       Date:  2020-06-29

Review 6.  Recent advances in understanding the epidemiology of healthcare-associated infections.

Authors:  Pranavi Sreeramoju
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2019-01-25

7.  The fight to keep resistance at bay, epidemiology of carbapenemase producing organisms (CPOs), vancomycin resistant enterococci (VRE) and methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in Norway, 2006 - 2017.

Authors:  Petter Elstrøm; Elisabeth Astrup; Kristin Hegstad; Ørjan Samuelsen; Hege Enger; Oliver Kacelnik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Model-based Assessment of the Effect of Contact Precautions Applied to Surveillance-detected Carriers of Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in Long-term Acute Care Hospitals.

Authors:  Damon J A Toth; Karim Khader; Alexander Beams; Matthew H Samore
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 9.079

9.  Does vancomycin resistance increase mortality in Enterococcus faecium bacteraemia after orthotopic liver transplantation? A retrospective study.

Authors:  S Dubler; M Lenz; S Zimmermann; D C Richter; K H Weiss; A Mehrabi; M Mieth; T Bruckner; M A Weigand; T Brenner; A Heininger
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 4.887

10.  Digestive Decolonization of Colorectal Carriage of Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium in a Japanese Adult.

Authors:  Shunsuke Uno; Yaoko Takano; Osamu Iketani; Tomohiro Abiko; Tomoru Miwa; Kosaku Nanki; Tomohiro Kurihara; Yuko Tamura; Miyuki Ara; Yoshifumi Uwamino; Masayoshi Shinjoh; Takehiko Mori; Naoki Hasegawa
Journal:  Intern Med       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 1.271

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.