S Vorilhon1,2, F Brugnon1,2,3, A Kocer2, S Dollet2,3, C Bourgne4, M Berger4, L Janny1,2, B Pereira5, R J Aitken6, A Moazamian7, P Gharagozloo7, J Drevet2, H Pons-Rejraji1,2,3. 1. CHU Clermont Ferrand, CHU Estaing, Laboratoire de Biologie du Développement et de la Reproduction, AMP, CECOS, F-63003 Clermont-Ferrand, France. 2. Université Clermont Auvergne, CNRS UMR6293, INSERM U1103, GReD, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France. 3. Université Clermont Auvergne, UFR Médecine, INSERM 1240, IMoST., F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France. 4. CHU Clermont Ferrand, Hôpital Estaing, Laboratoire d'Hématologie Biologique, F-63003 Clermont-Ferrand, France. 5. CHU Clermont-Ferrand, DRCI, 'Délégation Recherche Clinique et Innovation', Clermont-Ferrand, France. 6. Priority Research Centre in Reproductive Science, Discipline of Biological Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia. 7. CellOxess LLC, 830 Bear Tavern Road, Ewing, NJ 08628, USA.
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION: Can a discriminant threshold be determined for human sperm DNA oxidation? SUMMARY ANSWER: A discriminant threshold was found with 65.8% of 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG)-positive sperm cells and a mean intensity of fluorescence (MIF) of 552 arbitrary units. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Oxidative stress is known to interfere with sperm quality and fertilizing capacity. However, current practice does not include the routine determination of oxidative DNA damage in spermatozoa; optimized consensus protocols are lacking and no thresholds of normality have been established. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Intra- and inter-method comparisons between four protocols (I-IV) were conducted to determine the most relevant and efficient means of assessing human sperm 8-OHdG content. Tests of assay repeatability, specificity, sensitivity and stability were performed to validate an optimized methodology for routine diagnostic use. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: This prospective study compared three immuno-detection methods including immunocytochemistry, fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry. Sperm DNA oxidation for 80 patients was determined relative to semen parameters and clinical conditions, using the selected immuno-detection protocol in comparison with a commercial kit. These patients (age 35 ± 1 years: mean ± SEM) presented with normozoospermic (n = 40) or altered parameters (necro- or/and astheno- or/and teratozoospermia or/and leukocytospermia). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Significant positive Pearson and Spearman correlations were determined for 8-OHdG values and sperm parameters using protocol III. A notable high and positive correlation was revealed for MIF with BMI and leukocyte concentration. Protocol III was the most discriminating method regarding assay repeatability, specificity, sensitivity, stability and reliability for sperm parameter alterations, in particular leukocytospermia according to parametric or non-parametric tests, effect-size determinations and factorial analysis such as principal component analysis and factor discriminant analysis. Of interest is that 39% of the subjects with 'pathological' sperm DNA oxidation values were normozoospermic. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The oligozoospermic population was not evaluated in this study because insufficient material was available to carry out the comparisons. However, spermatozoa concentration was taken into account in the statistical analysis. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Our study is the first validation of a protocol to determine a discriminant threshold for human sperm DNA oxidation. The protocol's detection accuracy for 8-OHdG human sperm DNA residues, stability over time, and relationship to human sperm quality were demonstrated. The assay should find application in the diagnosis of male factor infertility associated with oxidative stress. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This work was funded by institutional grants from the CNRS, INSERM and Université Clermont Auvergne (to J.R.D.) and by Clermont-Ferrand Hospital-CECOS research funds (to L.J. and F.B.). P.G., A.M., R.J.A. and J.D. are, respectively, CEO, scientific director and scientific advisors of a US-based biotech company (Celloxess, Princeton, NJ, USA) involved in preventative medicine with a focus on the generation of antioxidant oral supplements.
STUDY QUESTION: Can a discriminant threshold be determined for human sperm DNA oxidation? SUMMARY ANSWER: A discriminant threshold was found with 65.8% of 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG)-positive sperm cells and a mean intensity of fluorescence (MIF) of 552 arbitrary units. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Oxidative stress is known to interfere with sperm quality and fertilizing capacity. However, current practice does not include the routine determination of oxidative DNA damage in spermatozoa; optimized consensus protocols are lacking and no thresholds of normality have been established. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Intra- and inter-method comparisons between four protocols (I-IV) were conducted to determine the most relevant and efficient means of assessing human sperm 8-OHdG content. Tests of assay repeatability, specificity, sensitivity and stability were performed to validate an optimized methodology for routine diagnostic use. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: This prospective study compared three immuno-detection methods including immunocytochemistry, fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry. Sperm DNA oxidation for 80 patients was determined relative to semen parameters and clinical conditions, using the selected immuno-detection protocol in comparison with a commercial kit. These patients (age 35 ± 1 years: mean ± SEM) presented with normozoospermic (n = 40) or altered parameters (necro- or/and astheno- or/and teratozoospermia or/and leukocytospermia). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Significant positive Pearson and Spearman correlations were determined for 8-OHdG values and sperm parameters using protocol III. A notable high and positive correlation was revealed for MIF with BMI and leukocyte concentration. Protocol III was the most discriminating method regarding assay repeatability, specificity, sensitivity, stability and reliability for sperm parameter alterations, in particular leukocytospermia according to parametric or non-parametric tests, effect-size determinations and factorial analysis such as principal component analysis and factor discriminant analysis. Of interest is that 39% of the subjects with 'pathological' sperm DNA oxidation values were normozoospermic. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The oligozoospermic population was not evaluated in this study because insufficient material was available to carry out the comparisons. However, spermatozoa concentration was taken into account in the statistical analysis. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Our study is the first validation of a protocol to determine a discriminant threshold for human sperm DNA oxidation. The protocol's detection accuracy for 8-OHdGhuman sperm DNA residues, stability over time, and relationship to human sperm quality were demonstrated. The assay should find application in the diagnosis of male factor infertility associated with oxidative stress. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This work was funded by institutional grants from the CNRS, INSERM and Université Clermont Auvergne (to J.R.D.) and by Clermont-Ferrand Hospital-CECOS research funds (to L.J. and F.B.). P.G., A.M., R.J.A. and J.D. are, respectively, CEO, scientific director and scientific advisors of a US-based biotech company (Celloxess, Princeton, NJ, USA) involved in preventative medicine with a focus on the generation of antioxidant oral supplements.
Authors: Neil A Youngson; G Mezbah Uddin; Abhirup Das; Carl Martinez; Haley S Connaughton; Sara Whiting; Josephine Yu; David A Sinclair; R John Aitken; Margaret J Morris Journal: Reproduction Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 3.906