Literature DB >> 29579159

Reactivation of the Nkx2.5 cardiac enhancer after myocardial infarction does not presage myogenesis.

Marcus-André Deutsch1,2,3, Stefanie A Doppler1,2, Xinghai Li1,2, Harald Lahm1,2, Gianluca Santamaria4,5, Giovanni Cuda4, Stefan Eichhorn1,2, Thomas Ratschiller6, Elda Dzilic1,2, Martina Dreßen1,2, Annekathrin Eckart7, Konstantin Stark3,7, Steffen Massberg3,7, Anna Bartels8, Christoph Rischpler3,8, Ralf Gilsbach9, Lutz Hein9,10, Bernd K Fleischmann11, Sean M Wu12, Rüdiger Lange1,2,3, Markus Krane1,2,3.   

Abstract

Aims: The contribution of resident stem or progenitor cells to cardiomyocyte renewal after injury in adult mammalian hearts remains a matter of considerable debate. We evaluated a cell population in the adult mouse heart induced by myocardial infarction (MI) and characterized by an activated Nkx2.5 enhancer element that is specific for multipotent cardiac progenitor cells (CPCs) during embryonic development. We hypothesized that these MI-induced cells (MICs) harbour cardiomyogenic properties similar to their embryonic counterparts. Methods and results: MICs reside in the heart and mainly localize to the infarction area and border zone. Interestingly, gene expression profiling of purified MICs 1 week after infarction revealed increased expression of stem cell markers and embryonic cardiac transcription factors (TFs) in these cells as compared to the non-mycoyte cell fraction of adult hearts. A subsequent global transcriptome comparison with embryonic CPCs and fibroblasts and in vitro culture of MICs unveiled that (myo-)fibroblastic features predominated and that cardiac TFs were only expressed at background levels. Conclusions: Adult injury-induced reactivation of a cardiac-specific Nkx2.5 enhancer element known to specifically mark myocardial progenitor cells during embryonic development does not reflect hypothesized embryonic cardiomyogenic properties. Our data suggest a decreasing plasticity of cardiac progenitor (-like) cell populations with increasing age. A re-expression of embryonic, stem or progenitor cell features in the adult heart must be interpreted very carefully with respect to the definition of cardiac resident progenitor cells. Albeit, the abundance of scar formation after cardiac injury suggests a potential to target predestinated activated profibrotic cells to push them towards cardiomyogenic differentiation to improve regeneration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29579159      PMCID: PMC6279078          DOI: 10.1093/cvr/cvy069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Res        ISSN: 0008-6363            Impact factor:   10.787


  51 in total

1.  Circulating cells contribute to cardiomyocyte regeneration after injury.

Authors:  Jasmine M F Wu; Ying-Chang Hsueh; Hui-Ju Ch'ang; Chwan-Yau Luo; Li-Wha Wu; Hiromitsu Nakauchi; Patrick C H Hsieh
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 17.367

2.  Surgical optimization and characterization of a minimally invasive aortic banding procedure to induce cardiac hypertrophy in mice.

Authors:  Tamara P Martin; Emma Robinson; Adam P Harvey; Margaret MacDonald; David J Grieve; Andrew Paul; Susan Currie
Journal:  Exp Physiol       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 2.969

Review 3.  Cardiac fibroblasts: more than mechanical support.

Authors:  Stefanie A Doppler; Catarina Carvalho; Harald Lahm; Marcus-André Deutsch; Martina Dreßen; Nazan Puluca; Rüdiger Lange; Markus Krane
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  A 3D map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals principles of chromatin looping.

Authors:  Suhas S P Rao; Miriam H Huntley; Neva C Durand; Elena K Stamenova; Ivan D Bochkov; James T Robinson; Adrian L Sanborn; Ido Machol; Arina D Omer; Eric S Lander; Erez Lieberman Aiden
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Cardiogenic genes expressed in cardiac fibroblasts contribute to heart development and repair.

Authors:  Milena B Furtado; Mauro W Costa; Edward A Pranoto; Ekaterina Salimova; Alexander R Pinto; Nicholas T Lam; Anthony Park; Paige Snider; Anjana Chandran; Richard P Harvey; Richard Boyd; Simon J Conway; James Pearson; David M Kaye; Nadia A Rosenthal
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 17.367

6.  Characterization of the inflammatory and fibrotic response in a mouse model of cardiac pressure overload.

Authors:  Ying Xia; Keunsang Lee; Na Li; Daniel Corbett; Leonardo Mendoza; Nikolaos G Frangogiannis
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2008-11-22       Impact factor: 4.304

7.  Differential expression of embryonic epicardial progenitor markers and localization of cardiac fibrosis in adult ischemic injury and hypertensive heart disease.

Authors:  Caitlin M Braitsch; Onur Kanisicak; Jop H van Berlo; Jeffery D Molkentin; Katherine E Yutzey
Journal:  J Mol Cell Cardiol       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 5.000

8.  Bismark: a flexible aligner and methylation caller for Bisulfite-Seq applications.

Authors:  Felix Krueger; Simon R Andrews
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  deepTools: a flexible platform for exploring deep-sequencing data.

Authors:  Fidel Ramírez; Friederike Dündar; Sarah Diehl; Björn A Grüning; Thomas Manke
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Integrative analysis of 111 reference human epigenomes.

Authors:  Anshul Kundaje; Wouter Meuleman; Jason Ernst; Misha Bilenky; Angela Yen; Alireza Heravi-Moussavi; Pouya Kheradpour; Zhizhuo Zhang; Jianrong Wang; Michael J Ziller; Viren Amin; John W Whitaker; Matthew D Schultz; Lucas D Ward; Abhishek Sarkar; Gerald Quon; Richard S Sandstrom; Matthew L Eaton; Yi-Chieh Wu; Andreas R Pfenning; Xinchen Wang; Melina Claussnitzer; Yaping Liu; Cristian Coarfa; R Alan Harris; Noam Shoresh; Charles B Epstein; Elizabeta Gjoneska; Danny Leung; Wei Xie; R David Hawkins; Ryan Lister; Chibo Hong; Philippe Gascard; Andrew J Mungall; Richard Moore; Eric Chuah; Angela Tam; Theresa K Canfield; R Scott Hansen; Rajinder Kaul; Peter J Sabo; Mukul S Bansal; Annaick Carles; Jesse R Dixon; Kai-How Farh; Soheil Feizi; Rosa Karlic; Ah-Ram Kim; Ashwinikumar Kulkarni; Daofeng Li; Rebecca Lowdon; GiNell Elliott; Tim R Mercer; Shane J Neph; Vitor Onuchic; Paz Polak; Nisha Rajagopal; Pradipta Ray; Richard C Sallari; Kyle T Siebenthall; Nicholas A Sinnott-Armstrong; Michael Stevens; Robert E Thurman; Jie Wu; Bo Zhang; Xin Zhou; Arthur E Beaudet; Laurie A Boyer; Philip L De Jager; Peggy J Farnham; Susan J Fisher; David Haussler; Steven J M Jones; Wei Li; Marco A Marra; Michael T McManus; Shamil Sunyaev; James A Thomson; Thea D Tlsty; Li-Huei Tsai; Wei Wang; Robert A Waterland; Michael Q Zhang; Lisa H Chadwick; Bradley E Bernstein; Joseph F Costello; Joseph R Ecker; Martin Hirst; Alexander Meissner; Aleksandar Milosavljevic; Bing Ren; John A Stamatoyannopoulos; Ting Wang; Manolis Kellis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 69.504

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Genomic enhancers in cardiac development and disease.

Authors:  Chukwuemeka G Anene-Nzelu; Mick C J Lee; Wilson L W Tan; Albert Dashi; Roger S Y Foo
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  Cardiac cell type-specific gene regulatory programs and disease risk association.

Authors:  James D Hocker; Olivier B Poirion; Fugui Zhu; Justin Buchanan; Kai Zhang; Joshua Chiou; Tsui-Min Wang; Qingquan Zhang; Xiaomeng Hou; Yang E Li; Yanxiao Zhang; Elie N Farah; Allen Wang; Andrew D McCulloch; Kyle J Gaulton; Bing Ren; Neil C Chi; Sebastian Preissl
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 14.136

3.  No effect of thymosin beta-4 on the expression of the transcription factor Islet-1 in the adult murine heart.

Authors:  Florian Weinberger; Philipp Nicol; Jutta Starbatty; Mandy Stubbendorff; Peter M Becher; Sonja Schrepfer; Thomas Eschenhagen
Journal:  Pharmacol Res Perspect       Date:  2018-06
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.