Literature DB >> 29579013

The Impact of Comorbid Mental Health Disorders on Complications Following Cervical Spine Surgery With Minimum 2-Year Surveillance.

Bassel G Diebo1, Joshua D Lavian1,2, Shian Liu3, Neil V Shah1, Daniel P Murray1,2, George A Beyer1,2, Frank A Segreto1, Fenizia Maffucci1,2, Gregory W Poorman4, Denis Cherkalin1,2, Barrett Torre1,2, Dennis Vasquez-Montes4, Hiroyuki Yoshihara1, Daniel Cukor5, Qais Naziri1, Peter G Passias4, Carl B Paulino1.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis.
OBJECTIVE: To improve understanding of the impact of comorbid mental health disorders (MHDs) on long-term outcomes following cervical spinal fusion in cervical radiculopathy (CR) or cervical myelopathy (CM) patients. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Subsets of patients with CR and CM have MHDs, and their impact on surgical complications is poorly understood.
METHODS: Patients admitted from 2009 to 2013 with CR or CM diagnoses who underwent cervical surgery with minimum 2-year surveillance were retrospectively reviewed using New York State's Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System. Patients with a comorbid MHD were compared against those without (no-MHD). Univariate analysis compared demographics, complications, readmissions, and revisions between MHD and no-MHD cohorts. Multivariate binary logistic regression models identified independent predictors of outcomes (covariates: age, sex, Charlson/Deyo score, and surgical approach).
RESULTS: A total of 20,342 patients (MHD: n = 4819; no-MHD: n = 15,523) were included. MHDs identified: depressive (57.8%), anxiety (28.1%), sleep (25.2%), and stress (2.9%). CR patients had greater prevalence of comorbid MHD than CM patients (P = 0.015). Two years postoperatively, all patients with MHD had significantly higher rates of complications (specifically: device-related, infection), readmission for any indication, and revision surgery (all P < 0.05); regression modeling corroborated these findings and revealed combined surgical approach as the strongest predictor for any complication (CR, odds ratio [OR]: 3.945, P < 0.001; CM, OR: 2.828, P < 0.001) and MHD as the strongest predictor for future revision (CR, OR: 1.269, P = 0.001; CM, OR: 1.248, P = 0.008) in both CR and CM cohorts.
CONCLUSION: Nearly 25% of patients admitted for CR and CM carried comorbid MHD and experienced greater rates of any complication, readmission, or revision, at minimum, 2 years after cervical spine surgery. Results must be confirmed with retrospective studies utilizing larger national databases and with prospective cohort studies. Patient counseling and psychological screening/support are recommended to complement surgical treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29579013     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002651

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  2 in total

1.  Appropriate Opioid Use After Spine Surgery: Psychobehavioral Barriers and Patient Knowledge.

Authors:  Rafa Rahman; Sara Wallam; Bo Zhang; Rahul Sachdev; Emmanuel L McNeely; Khaled M Kebaish; Lee H Riley; David B Cohen; Amit Jain; Sang H Lee; Daniel M Sciubba; Richard L Skolasky; Brian J Neuman
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 2.210

2.  A national snapshot of the impact of clinical depression on post-surgical pain and adverse outcomes after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for cervical myelopathy and radiculopathy: 10-year results from the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample.

Authors:  Jiang Chen; Jin-Yu Li; Gui-Hua Tian; Rui-Jin Qiu; Xue-Qian Zhao; Xue-Shi Di; Qiao-Mei Yuan; Shui-Wen Long; Yu Ran; Yu-Song Jia; Hong-Cai Shang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.