OBJECTIVES: Tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) are prescribed with caution in the elderly due to diverse side effects. We analyzed the patterns of TCA use in elderly patients in primary-care and specialty clinics and investigated factors influencing TCA prescriptions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Elderly patients (≥ 65 years old) prescribed antidepressants in primary-care clinics in 2013 were included from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service-Aged Patient Sample (HIRA-APS). Prevalence of TCA prescriptions was assessed by insurance coverage status, clinical specialty, and region. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to compute odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for factors associated with TCA prescriptions. RESULTS: TCAs and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) comprised 45.2% and 15.0% of all antidepressant prescriptions, respectively. TCAs comprised 61.5% and 20.7% of antidepressant prescriptions for pain and depression, respectively. Patients aged ≥ 85 years were less likely to be treated with TCAs (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.79 - 0.84) than those aged 65 - 69 years. The odds for being prescribed TCAs were higher for patients residing in cities (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.18 - 1.23), treated in nonpsychiatric clinics (OR 5.64, 95% CI 5.53 - 5.76), and those covered by Veteran's Health (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.37 - 1.90) when compared to patients residing in the Seoul metropolitan area, treated in psychiatric clinics, or covered by National Health Insurance, respectively. The prescriptions of TCAs with pain diagnoses were much higher than prescriptions for depression (OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.82 - 1.93). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with a 2005 report, the prevalence of TCA prescriptions in elderly patients in Korea has decreased substantially, but remains high. Various efforts should be considered to reduce TCA prescriptions in the elderly. .
OBJECTIVES: Tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) are prescribed with caution in the elderly due to diverse side effects. We analyzed the patterns of TCA use in elderly patients in primary-care and specialty clinics and investigated factors influencing TCA prescriptions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Elderly patients (≥ 65 years old) prescribed antidepressants in primary-care clinics in 2013 were included from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service-Aged Patient Sample (HIRA-APS). Prevalence of TCA prescriptions was assessed by insurance coverage status, clinical specialty, and region. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to compute odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for factors associated with TCA prescriptions. RESULTS: TCAs and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) comprised 45.2% and 15.0% of all antidepressant prescriptions, respectively. TCAs comprised 61.5% and 20.7% of antidepressant prescriptions for pain and depression, respectively. Patients aged ≥ 85 years were less likely to be treated with TCAs (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.79 - 0.84) than those aged 65 - 69 years. The odds for being prescribed TCAs were higher for patients residing in cities (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.18 - 1.23), treated in nonpsychiatric clinics (OR 5.64, 95% CI 5.53 - 5.76), and those covered by Veteran's Health (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.37 - 1.90) when compared to patients residing in the Seoul metropolitan area, treated in psychiatric clinics, or covered by National Health Insurance, respectively. The prescriptions of TCAs with pain diagnoses were much higher than prescriptions for depression (OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.82 - 1.93). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with a 2005 report, the prevalence of TCA prescriptions in elderly patients in Korea has decreased substantially, but remains high. Various efforts should be considered to reduce TCA prescriptions in the elderly. .
Authors: Min Ji Kim; Namwoo Kim; Daun Shin; Sang Jin Rhee; C Hyung Keun Park; Hyeyoung Kim; Sung Joon Cho; Jae Won Lee; Eun Young Kim; Boram Yang; Yong Min Ahn Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-09-25 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Yu-Seon Jung; David Suh; Hang-Seok Choi; Hee-Deok Park; Sun-Young Jung; Dong-Churl Suh Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-02-17 Impact factor: 3.390